Jump to content

User:Xymmax

This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


I first registered this account - my first - April 20, 2007. Since then, I've gotten involved pretty deeply in AfD work. I see it as a chance to triage articles that are flawed, but may yet have potential. If you need access to a Wikipedia article that has been deleted, ask me. If it's not a copyright violation, libel, or personal information, and has not been deleted as a suspected biographies of living persons violation, I will userfy the article for you.

Note that using the text to recreate any deleted article may automatically qualify them for speedy deletion, and copies of previously deleted content that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion because Wikipedia is not a free web host. We have a list of alternative sites which may be used to host your content.

I maintain a sock account AVPW primarily for use on public networks. In the event of a compromised account, I specifically request any administrator to honor a request from AVPW to block this account, and absolve you in advance of any repercussions.

To do list:


    Add'l links


    CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


    Immediate requests Entries
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Wikipedians looking for help 1
    Requests for unblock 70
    Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 83
    Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 16
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 0
    Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 199
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 29
    Open sockpuppet investigations 27
    Click here to locate other admin backlogs

    AB = Administrative Backlogs

    [edit]

    Administrative backlog

    [edit]

    AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

    Administrator intervention against vandalism

    Reports

    [edit]

    User-reported

    [edit]


    CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

    Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
    User requested 0
    Empty articles 0
    Nonsense pages 1
    Spam pages 1
    Importance or significance not asserted 1
    Other candidates 28

    The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
    ( source / chronological order / expired )

    UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

    Usernames for administrator attention

    User-reported

    [edit]
    Requests for page protection


    Current requests for increase in protection level

    [edit]
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Reason: IP edit warring – WP:HEADLINE, WP:OR, and WP:POV violations. Medxvo (talk) 10:08, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Consistent unsourced changes over the past few days, given the subject of the page passed away recently. Along with multiple conflicting reports on the individual's age. Packerfan386beer here 13:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry from many years. IPs are also adding poorly sourced content. Has been protected 3 times but temporarily, so temporary protection is of no use now. saluere, Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs 13:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/IPA Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Semi protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent IP/new editor disruption. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:44, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Non-constructive edits and vandalism from non registered IPs. Thegreatrebellion (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple users, referred to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Slomzy0932 and subsequently blocked, have attempted edits to this article, particularly regarding genres. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple users, referred to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Slomzy0932 and subsequently blocked, have attempted edits to this article, particularly regarding genres. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Oops, requesting this to be semi-protected, not extended confirmed protected. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reported this to AIV - the IP behind this is now partially blocked. Entranced98 (talk) 23:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
    Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: High level of IP unreferenced & non-constructive edits. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:50, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    +1 Plenty of vandalism and BLP issues, especially within the past day. Entranced98 (talk) 23:10, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP 2601:283:4600:36c0:1937:bca:aded:5635, also using other IP's in same range is persistently adding unsourced names to text, is edit warring, had not replied to Talk page warning(s) and has now started "shouting" comments to their constant reversions. Several editors have reverted these unsourced additions, which have been reverted back by IP(s). David J Johnson (talk) 19:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Several users keep adding unsourced information about the series ending after the page is currently protected. Edit approval maybe required. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 19:36, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism like [1]. Put a page protection for 30 days. see page's history to gain more insights on vandal ip attacks on this page. —⚰️NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 19:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 01:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated vandalism from IP hopping editor, section blanking for spurious reasons. MrOllie (talk) 21:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:25, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
    Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Related to Anti-Zionism. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 21:43, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And kind of tangential to PIA. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: An IP address in Pakistan (175.107.211.119) has been vandalizing the page repeatedly for about a week. I've been reverting them, but can it perhaps get temporary protection for a couple of weeks, with the hope they'll get bored? Etoile ✩ (talk) 23:13, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Request retracted as the specific IP has been blocked from the page. A peculiar message was left on my talk page almost immediately after, but I have no idea if this is from that user. Etoile ✩ (talk) 23:46, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
    Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism 191.99.33.138 (talk) 23:53, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Vandalism 191.99.33.138 (talk) 23:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Vandalism 191.99.33.138 (talk) 23:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article was only created two weeks ago. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: IP vandalism 191.99.33.138 (talk) 23:56, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/KURD. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: User request within own user space. some one took it off •Cyberwolf•. talk? 01:26, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Done Materialscientist (talk) 02:50, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: User request within own user space. Per BusterD's comment in Special:Diff/1285477831, it was protected because of WP:DE, but there appears to be no good reason for non-extended-confirmed users to edit my user page. That user also said I can request any administrator to change the protection level if I choose to do so. Z. Patterson (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: If left unprotected, this Wikipedia will be 100% vandalized over the next two weeks before the Canadian election. 67.193.169.85 (talk) 02:20, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    [edit]
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: I would like request the removal of page protection for Julian Bunetta. This page was salted in March 2020 following a successful AfD, and from the comments there, it seems like he failed WP:MUSICBIO at the time and that the content was lacking. While I'm sure that as true at the time, Bunetta's rise in profile, the significant increase in coverage about him, and his recent Grammy nominations made him seem a little overdue for a page, so I've been working on putting that together for the last month or so. I created a draft in my userspace that includes a plethora of sources and information about his life and career, and I think it warrants the removal of creation protection.

    As an extra note, I also plan to make a discography page for him due to the volume of his work if this protection is lifted, so the existing discography section would split out to that page and expanded to include non-singles. Sock (tock talk) 00:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: The information is outdated and due nature of protection information can be updated GlobalAirport (talk) 15:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    The talk page is not protected. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Page has been protected since 2008 (17 years) as of 2025. Given that there hasn't been much vandalism, I think we could try pending changes Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because vandalism in this article has died down. 2600:1700:6180:6290:9166:760B:763B:2730 (talk) 23:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

     Comment:That's kind of what protection is for. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Page has been protected since 2017 (8 years) as of 2025. Given that there hasn't been much vandalism, I think we could try pending changes. 69.193.154.106 (talk) 23:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

     Comment: Have you considered that the vandalism might have stopped because of the protection? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because sockpuppet is no active anymore and not much vandalism on this page it has been protected by MelanieN on July 7, 2020 plus she no longer administrator I just checked the tool username information according to unprotection request who ever is inactive or no longer administrator it can be appeal, if who ever active then we will have to contact who protect by username administrator so I'm requesting to be unprotected. 69.193.154.106 (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    The last time it was unprotected (right before the aforementioned prot by MelanieN), it had to be reinstated because of sockpuppetry even after seven years. Discounting that history, this unprotection request segues into the nonsensical. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:08, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Or maybe we could try pending changes either way. 69.193.154.106 (talk) 00:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Reducing protection would allow for constructive contributions from more editors and help improve the article collaboratively. Wikimaster23456 (talk) 03:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    [edit]
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Handled requests

    [edit]
    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
    Protected edit requests

    0 protected edit requests
    v·h
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:59, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
    17 template-protected edit requests
    v·h
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-02-03 08:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Template:Infobox martial artist (request) 2025-02-05 21:13 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Template:Infobox language (request) 2025-02-12 04:16 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
    Template:Infobox school district (request) 2025-03-01 04:00 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Template:Video game reviews (request) 2025-03-28 10:58 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
    Template:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 02:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2015-02-17: "Highly visible template: More than 7500 transclusions"
    Template:Merged-from (request) 2025-04-02 03:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Module:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 03:43 Template-protected (log) Protected by Newslinger on 2020-06-14: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Infobox sports league (request) 2025-04-02 04:26 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2025-04-02 23:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Template:Code (request) 2025-04-06 18:03 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
    Template:Infobox drug (request) 2025-04-08 00:36 Template-protected (log) From Template:Drugbox: Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Template:College athlete recruit end (request) 2025-04-11 02:44 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Module:Lang/data (request) 2025-04-13 05:56 Template-protected (log) Protected by Trappist the monk on 2017-12-13: "High-risk Lua module"
    Template:Infobox person (request) 2025-04-13 18:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
    Template:Infobox diocese (request) 2025-04-14 05:28 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Template:AllMusic (request) 2025-04-14 21:48 Template-protected (log) From Template:Allmusic: Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)


    RFA= Requests for adminship

    RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
    EggRoll97 2 62 16 8 79 15:07, 19 April 2025 4 days, 11 hoursno report
    LaundryPizza03 65 71 23 48 03:18, 17 April 2025 1 day, 23 hoursno report
    RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

    Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 03:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

    RFP= Requests for permissions

    Autopatrolled

    [edit]

    New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

    One thing that immediately jumped out at me is some biographical articles created (e.g. Kim Na and Son Se-bin) have unsourced biographical information, such as the date of birth. This information should be sourced to ensure compliance with WP:DOB. - Aoidh (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
    I've considered adding references directly next to DOB, which I did at my two most recent BLPs: Mike Kim and Lee Joon-ho. If birth information is not 100% verifiable, I play it safe (eg. Lee Seung-yoon). Per WP:DOB, links to websites maintained by the subject are generally permitted so I included Kim Na's personal website which states birth year as 1986 in the external links section. I created Son Se-bin over 5 years ago when I was much less experienced, so I don't quite recall which exact source I used for DOB (birth year seems to have been present in Star Today), so I've just amended that. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
    Ah I've misinterpreted that personal website policy, though it does fall under WP:ABOUTSELF, I've now also directly sourced it. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

    I had created around 50+ articles on the English wikipedia, I handle and edit topics mostly on colonial architectures, there are many articles needed to be created on that feild so I would like to request Autopatrolled rights for my account and also to help page reviewers for decreasing workload. Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 14:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 14:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
    (Non-administrator comment) Took a gander at the most recently created articles. On BQM-106 Teleplane, three of four sources are WP:USERGENERATED ([3]), self-published ([4]), or unreliable per RSN. All three sources on LIM-99 are unreliable for the same reasons. Kasmanda Palace relies entirely on primary sources, travel blogs and SPS, plus has a problem with WP:CLOP: [5]. Same sourcing problems with Kellogg Memorial Church. I think your work will continue to benefit from being patrolled. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
     Not done as per the analysis by Dclemens1971. Schwede66 22:43, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
    There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.


    Confirmed

    [edit]

    Page mover

    [edit]

    I wish to assist at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. I also close WP:RM discussions from time to time and this tool will save me from having to do a technical request every time. I meet the WP:PMCRITERIA. GMH Melbourne (talk) 04:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)


    Pending changes reviewer

    [edit]

    I have been active on Wikipedia, I'd like to request PCR to monitor recent changes. I'm aware of WP:NOTVANDAL & WP:AGF, so there won't be any "biting newcomers" reverts. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

    Hi! My name is WormEater13. I would like to request PCR rights. Having created multiple articles before and having made over 100 manual mainspace edits, especially for WP:BLP, I believe that I am knowledgable about Wikipedia policies such as WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:NOTABILITY. WormEater13 (talkcontribs) 13:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([6]). MusikBot talk 13:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

    I am requesting permission to be a Pending Changes Reviewer. I spend most of my day editing Wikipedia. I have gone through almost all the pages under Category:Wikipedia policies, including Wikipedia's policies on vandalism detection, BLP policy, NPOV, Verifiability, and copyright. I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes guideline. Please consider my request. Somajyoti 07:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has had an account for 25 days. MusikBot talk 07:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

    Hi, I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights on English Wikipedia to tackle with the edits protected with pending changes while patrolling in the RC, since I have rollback rights. I think I fulfill the criteria to get this right. Also, I understand the related policies to manage these edits. This would give me a better chance to work to improve Wikipedia.

    Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC)


    Rollback

    [edit]

    I'd like to try some other counter-vandalism tools, such as AntiVandal, Huggle, and SWViewer, which require the rollback right to use. I've actively been patrolling recent changes for roughly 3-4 months and have consistently warned editors when reverting them. Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

     Done Aoidh (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

    Greetings, I am requesting for the rollback rights to assist my passion in fighting against vandalism and roll off disruptive edits on Wikipedia, I actively scroll on recent changes feed and also new page feeds, I am familiar with WP:VANDALISM, I wish to use the AntiVandal tool which will help me revert more edits that goes against Wikipedia policies, I will love to help the community, Thanks to any admin willing at his or her discretion to grant me this permission. Best Regards (CP) 22:07, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

     Not done. You've been inconsistently warning editors (or otherwise not explaining the reason) when reverting them. I'm also concerned about this edit, since being a new editor is never a reason to revert them, especially when the COI tag alluded to was recently added by a block-evading sockpuppet who had already been blocked when that revert was made, who had a problematic history of accusing others of having a COI even before the sockpuppetry block. Alluding that this new editor had a conflict of interest was inappropriate, as was reverting them on that basis. - Aoidh (talk) 01:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
    Thank you for the notice @Aoidh, tho I wasn’t comfortable with the edit from the new user but still I have reverted many misleading edits in good faith, and Atimes I use the vandalism botton to revert which doesn’t give me an option to explain reasons, but most of my revert I give reasons, you can check it there. Also see this Warning, Atimes I will warn on user talk or the IP talk, please I will love to have a trial of this permission so I can use the "AntiVandalism" tool. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 23:06, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
    You're responsible for your edits, which includes using edit summaries and explanations when needed. If tools you're using (including Rollback) or a script prevents you from using an edit summary when one would be needed, then that tool or script should not be used to make that edit. A track record of doing this should be shown before reapplying, since using rollback and failing to provide an explanation when needed is cause for removal of that tool, as Wikipedia:Rollback notes. As mentioned in the criteria at the top of WP:PERM/R, there should also be [a] track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits. - Aoidh (talk) 00:26, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
    @Aoidh Most of my revert have summary but if I won’t get the permission on either trials or indefinitely that’s fine, when should I reapply? Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 00:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
    I would personally suggest at least a month or two of solid anti-vandalism work, using edit summaries when needed and consistently notifying editors during that time period, before reapplying. - Aoidh (talk) 00:43, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
    Sadly, other revert with summary didn’t count. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 00:48, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    I have been editing constructively on the project for a few years now and would like to more effectively revert disruptive edits when I encounter them. I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies and understand the distinction between purely disruptive edits and edits that may be unhelpful but are made in good-faith. When reverting a new user's edits, I make sure to properly explain myself in an edit summary and leave a message on the relevant article's or user's talk page as appropriate, unless the user is obviously acting in bad faith and WP:DENY applies, in which case I report them to a relevant noticeboard. I have thoroughly read the WP:ROLLBACK instructions and will make sure to familiarize myself with the tools before using them, and avoid using the rollback tools when they are not appropriate and another reversion tool would be more suitable. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

     Done Malinaccier (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    I would like to request rollback permissions to help combat vandalism more effectively on Wikipedia, I have been reverting vandalism for a good amount of time from recent changes using twinkle and undo. Therefore I think rollback tool can help me to assist in identifying and reverting unconstructive edits efficiently. Imwin567 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

    Hello. I would like to get a rollback. I often search for vandalism on Wikipedia, and it will obviously be easier for me to fight it with a rollback. I warn users when necessary, and i know the most important WP policies. The Seal F1 (talk) 07:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

    Hello! Im requesting rollback rights because i am an extended confirmed user that has made hundreds of high-quality edits in mainspace. I need rollback tool to revert vandalism and other non-constructive edits more easier. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 21:18, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

     Not done. You do not need rollback to revert vandalism, and as the criteria at the top of WP:PERM/R notes, editors requesting rollback should have [a]t least a month of experience patrolling Special:RecentChanges and [a] track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits. - Aoidh (talk) 00:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

    I request rollback rights to quickly revert clear vandalism and disruptive edits. This would help maintain article integrity and ease the workload for admins, especially during active vandalism periods. Thank you for considering my request. VeritasVanguard: "Seeking truth in every edit" 16:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has 99 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 16:10, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
    There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

    Template editor

    [edit]

    Footer

    [edit]

    Policies and links

      Today's afd

      Citation_templates

      Edit counter and analysis

      This user is a member of the

      Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

      AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
      AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

      Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

      It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

      This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

      Committed identity: 5e0a9af339f30221a08fa86264cf1a81e3637ef17bd7ba87260c63b0fea3cdb0b55f545f061dd97184aa4061626c8c41b7237f4b18ccfdd096bff83e92ce9fc5 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

      I copied this source code from someone's user page I liked. I did not save the name. Thank you, whomever you are.