User talk:AirshipJungleman29

History of Christianity

Want to take one last look before I renominate? You have been amazing. I am more grateful than I can say. Jenhawk777 (talk) 16:03, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Renominating already Jenhawk777?! Have you checked the citations? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

I've done about 3/4 - maybe a little more - of them. I will attempt to finish before renominating, but otherwise I am hoping that adding content is pretty much done. May the WP gods agree. Jenhawk777 (talk) 16:20, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

I need to be done with the one so I can have the time needed to do the other. Jenhawk777 (talk) 16:44, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

For one thing, the lead needs work. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Too long? Too much detail? I made it a point to add the East there - too much? I have also found about five more significant things to add to the Middle Ages - just sentences, but still important enough to need mentioning. Jenhawk777 (talk) 17:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Too long, probably too much detail on the East, too verbose. Concision and clarity needed. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:22, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Got it. Verbose is my middle name, but I will pretend I'm you. Done I think. Jenhawk777 (talk) 04:48, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

More needed. Keep in mind the principles of WP:LEAD, specifically MOS:LEADREL and MOS:OPEN. Also think about the lead image: does it meet MOS:LEADIMAGE, is it a "natural and appropriate representations of the topic" as high-quality reference works use for similar purposes? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:59, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Changed that image, redid lead, added content you requested, and resourced to remove tags. If you would take a quick look and see if those changes suit, then I will move on to source checking. Jenhawk777 (talk) 18:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Are you so deep in despair over me that you can't even deal with answering? Jenhawk777 (talk) 04:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

No, just busy IRL, and sort of wanting to get back to writing. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Does that mean you are done? Jenhawk777 (talk) 15:04, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

No. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

You're pretty cool you know. What's next? Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:30, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Alright Jenhawk777, I think we're reaching the point where issues with the article (if they exist) tend to be less superficial, and I don't really have the time to delve through sources for answers. You may want to ask others for input, or have another crack at FAC. When the latter happens, you can put me down as a co-nominator if you want me to help you respond to reviews, or you may prefer that I stay as a reviewer in which case I'll probably drop by after other have got their oars in. In either case, it's been a pleasure working with you on the article, and best of luck. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for everything. Are you 'legally' able to review since you have contributed so much? If so, will there be surprises for me? My first choice would be to include you as a co-nominator if I can, but I don't want to obligate you further. Do you have a first choice? Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

There's no obligation. Yeah, it would be sort of odd for me to be a reviewer at this point, and perhaps if I'm a co-nominator some reviewers might be ... less hostile? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:21, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I think there might be less hostility if you are a co-nominator. So, okay then. I am going over sources now. Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

What issues? Working together has certainly been my pleasure, but I admit, I'm a bit surprised that you say so! Did you see your awards? Gerda figured out what was wrong. DUH! Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:21, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Okay. I did it. I hope I did it correctly! My stomach hurts. Jenhawk777 (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

You were right about the map, I should have listened. Nikkimaria is not accepting text as an "alternate method". So how does one go about creating that? Jenhawk777 (talk) 02:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

HELP!! I don't know how to correctly do any of what Nikkimaria says needs doing with the images. Could you answer her? Jenhawk777 (talk) 02:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

I attempted to strike some of my responses that are completed and ended with everything being struck, and I can't figure out why. I have gone back and looked for a loose s with no /s and can't find it - what did I do? Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Nevermind! I figured it out!~ Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Two more editors have shown up with requests for additions. One wants bigger captions on the images - is that a good idea? Another wants more theology, and since Borsoka has also requested something on the Trinity, I will probably have to do that. One says I should stick to my guns about not including theology, but that I should add a "background" section up front to explain that. (???) Buidhe has opposed because, while she acknowledges that I have followed what the sources say, she wants me to interpret them differently, and I think that's OR - am I wrong? It's Easter weekend and I have company, so it will be next week before I can do much of this, but I am a bit overwhelmed. Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Sadly, I'm on holiday too; will try to get on it if possible, but no promises. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

I understand. I'm doing the best I can. You do the best you can - and it will probably still be better than mine... . Have a good holiday, come back loaded for bear - please. Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Questions (April)

Question from Dave83821

Hi there,

I have had a page rejected a couple of times and I have tried to get more clarity (on both their talk page and my own) however I've not recieved anything back for a few days. Hopefully you could give me a hand clearing things up?

Thanks :) --Dave83821 (talk) 22:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Dave83821, I have added numerous tags to the draft, pointing out issues needing resolution, such as the absence of citations and some promotional prose. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:49, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Rock1n39

How do I get Wikipedia under my name on Google telling about myself --Rock1n39 (talk) 05:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Rock1n39, that is very strongly discouraged per this page. If you are actually notable enough for Wikipedia, please wait until someone else writes an article about you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:50, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Theres loads of articles on google about me can you use one Rock1n39 (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Can you provide an example Rock1n39? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from CoachKellyej

Hi. Please help.

I have just created my first edit. I would like to site the sources I have listed but I am having difficulty with the hyperlink. Would you kindly help?

Existential crises' are inner conflicts characterized by the impression that life lacks meaning and confusion about one's personal identity. They are accompanied by anxiety and stress, often to such a degree that they disturb one's normal functioning in everyday life and can lead to depression Existential Crisis is not listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) therefore it is not a psychiatric disorderhttps://www.britannica.com/topic/existential-crisis. You can not get medicine for an existential crisis. https://people.howstuffworks.com/what-does-it-really-mean-to-have-existential-crisis.htm Existential crisis is temporary and does not meet the six months of continuous anxiety symptoms for an anxiety diagnosis. Existential anxiety is different because it is comorbid with anxiety and medication can be prescribed to address the anxiety symptoms. Depression requires one year of symptoms for youth and two years of symptoms for adults. --CoachKellyej (talk) 11:57, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi CoachKellyej. For help with citations, please see Help:Cite; there are various ways to cite sources. However, this particular edit does not follow Wikipedia's style guideline for the lead section, as it goes into too much detail, especially for the first paragraph of an article. Your edits will thus have to be reverted. Please do not be discouraged; making bold edits is what Wikipedia is based on, and with experience you will go a long way. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:41, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello. How can I create a post? Or, are you able to create a post for me? I have created a theory and i would like to post it on Wikipedia --CoachKellyej (talk) 16:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi CoachKellyej, you might want to look at Help:Your first article. Please note that theories you have created are very likely to not be suitable for Wikipedia: any article subject must be notable enough for inclusion, which means it must have been described in multiple reliable sources. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:49, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Dengayokkuel

Hello,

I would like to add my Bio, please guide on how I go about doing that.

Thanks. --Dengayokkuel (talk) 09:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Dengayokkuel; creating autobiographies is heavily discouraged on Wikipedia, as this is not a site for self-promotion. For more information, please see the links I have placed on your talkpage. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Jyotimakkar1310

hey can you please let me know how to properly make edits --Jyotimakkar1310 (talk) 07:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Jyotimakkar1310, please see the links on your talkpage. If you have any further questions, feel free to drop me a line. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from ErrataNonGrata

Hi! I hope to become more active, but I have been doing some editing for a few years. I've been using Citation Hunter and Wikipedia's internal suggestion engine to address maintenance templates. A common one I see is "This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information," often from around 2010-2015.

When I review these articles they have been heavily edited by many users and don't currently seem to use puffery or other language to watch (E.g., "Michela Wrong," "Nazia and Zoheb"), but as a newbie, I'm reluctant to remove these flags. Can you help me either identify what I'm missing or confirm that I am allowed to remove the tag?

Thank you! --ErrataNonGrata (talk) 09:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello ErrataNonGrata, and please accept my compliments on your excellent username. Tags like that one you describe are useful to point out issues, but you are correct that sometimes they are or have become incorrect. Looking at Nazia and Zoheb as an example, you can see that the tag was added in April 2014, and much has changed since then. I would certainly delete the promotional tag. I hope that helps; remember to always be bold in your editing, and feel free to drop me a line if you need any advice or thoughts. Best, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I'm glad to know I'm on the right track and you concur. I'll be a little bolder and if I see a clear case that ticks all these boxes I'll move forward in the futurre.

Thank you for your help (and the lovely comment on my username!) ErrataNonGrata (talk) 02:06, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

April music

story · music · places

My story today is about an opera singer born OTD in 1870. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:03, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

What do you think about ALT4 for Nicole Gee? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:28, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Tout est lumière. - What do you think about hooks for Nicole Gee? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:16, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

today: a woman in red --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

On top of two entries for Roberto among the recent deaths, brainstorming for Easter music is going on in the nom, at the end - ALT0e/f/g/h - if you have little time. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Next problem: WT:DYK#Good Friday. After I heard Bach's St John Passion yesterday (see music), it occurred to me that I missed the work by a great woman, that was inspired by it, in prep. - ALTs for the other run to m now. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:35, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Nevermind. Check out my talk: for that Johannes-Passion (listen!), our music in detail, and three people who recently died and are on the main page (where the composer isn't). My call for collaboration has the first "no". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

What do you think of this Easter vs. 1 April discussion. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:20, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for replying. - My story is about music that Bach and Picander gave the world 300 years (and 19 days) ago, - listen (on the conductor's birthday) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

The 2025 Core Contest has begun!

The Core Contest has now begun! Evaluate your article's current state, gather sources, and have at it! You have until May 31 (23:59 UTC) to make eligible changes; although you are most welcome (and encouraged) to continue work on the article, changes after May 31 will not be considered for rankings and their prizes. Good luck and happy editing! Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

Bangladesh genocide

Hi, I'd like to ask a clarification question regarding your close in Talk:Bangladesh genocide/Archive 7. The reason I'm asking now is because aside from one !voter who found the RfC through AN/I, every single other "Bengali Hindus" !voter—A.Musketeer, Nomian, Shubhrojeet, I.Bhardwaj, and LucrativeOffer—was recently blocked as a sockpuppet. This dispute arose solely due to these socks. Wikipedia:Dealing with sockpuppets#Closed discussions isn't that clear about how to deal with a closed RfC, which doesn't involve any admin action.

You left some wiggle room in your close ("as an example"). Would mentioning "Bengalis" in the first sentence and "Bengali Hindus" later in the lead (for example, in the following sentence or paragraph) respect consensus? Whether "Bengali Hindus" belongs in the first sentence or later in the lead is clearly debatable per MOS:FIRST, and I'm not sure if any active contributor to the article in good standing actually supports putting it in the first sentence. After the socks were blocked, it was reverted to "Bengalis", and no one has cared to add it back after almost a month.

As you pointed out, the RfC was technically malformed. If the RfC were discarded entirely, it seems obvious to me that the first sentence would be quite stable in stating "Bengalis". Malerisch (talk) 17:25, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Malerisch, that is quite the pickle. Since it has been a year since that RfC, I'd say WP:IARing and retaining the stable status quo might be best. You might alternatively want to seek opinions at WP:VPM. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll go with WP:IAR then. Malerisch (talk) 18:38, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

oops

sorry. thank you. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 10:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

No worries. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rani of Jhansi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rani of Jhansi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSincccc -- MSincccc (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi

bro airship, why did u like so much moving a battle page of something that was literally legal to shared off? Like siege of balkh and battle of Beijing 1215?? Druzi1039 (talk) 14:48, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

What? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

bro you don't understand what im saying? I mean like i Saw you 2 Times redirect and moving a conflict page to something. Even though it was legally existed on other language article. Why? Druzi1039 (talk) 00:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

anyways im just asking Druzi1039 (talk) 00:37, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

No, I don't understand. You appear to be asking about redirects; see WP:REDIRECT for the relevant procedures. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

my point is, why do you redirect page of Siege of balkh (1370) and Battle of zhongdu during Mongol Invasion of China? Its better to have theyre own article Druzi1039 (talk) 01:38, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

See WP:GNG. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Happy Easter!

Wishing you peace, joy, and renewal this Easter season. Thank you for all you do to keep Wikipedia growing and thriving.

Stay well, and happy editing! MSincccc (talk) 18:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Best wishes to you too MSincccc! Looking forward to your next comments on the GA review! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rani of Jhansi

The article Rani of Jhansi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rani of Jhansi for comments about the article, and Talk:Rani of Jhansi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSincccc -- MSincccc (talk) 10:45, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Silo34 (18:59, 23 April 2025)

Hi. How I send a news link or YouTube link? --Silo34 (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2025 (UTC)