Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- 103.86.174.129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 11:36, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- 12.75.36.89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 30 five times in the last 5 minutes (Large deletion from article by new editors, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. PhilKnight (talk) 11:36, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Purefanatic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- 2A02:B125:15:3B55:C73A:A636:EE2B:D38D (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Eurabia conspiracy theory: Thinks reversion of their removal of sourced content is "censorship", and called ClueBot a slur. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 11:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Safavideditt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Persistent vandalism adding unsourced things. Kajmer05 (talk) 12:06, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Veverve (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Has for the third time undone useful edits on The Liberal Catholic Church page, without clear reasons. Veverve has been banned before for repeatedly removing edits on Catholic pages, possibly indicating a lack of remorse for these actions, and a possibly biased agenda on the topic.
- Antiracistfactchecker (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- The username is anti-racist. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Limecuck (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Bot9339838 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- MediocreDudeWhoIsGenerallyPrettyBoring (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Pukebrain (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- UchihaItachiMangekyoSharingan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Yad Yid Yed (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "\b(yid)s?\b" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:50, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Angel-gabriels-blessedartthoughamongwomen-syringe (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Limited9835 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Limited982747 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- InsaneMotorBoat (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "insane|psychopath|criminal" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:00, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- TrustmeIknowsomethingyoudont (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 12:07, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High traffic, important page. Occasional vandalism too. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 00:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP block evasion. Please see 99.46.139.248, 2600:1700:489:2670:0:0:0:0/64, and (currently) 2603:3024:1258:E200:0:0:0:0/64.
I would also suggest that in addition, their other targets, being What a Cartoon! and The Patrick Star Show, be protected as well. Magitroopa (talk) 01:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: In order to handle obviously bad faith contributions from new or unregistered users without deterring good faith ones. BangJan1999 01:39, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. WP:CT/EE and WP:CT/AP clashed. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A short-term protection would be helpful as there is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the subject's name and gender. FMSky (talk) 01:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit-warring. Media Mender 📬✍🏻 02:11, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistant replacement of overly large episode summaries with MOS:SEAOFBLUE overlinking. Multiple IPs, likely same editor. Adakiko (talk) 03:01, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Remsense ‥ 论 04:27, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High IP Vandalism. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 06:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent edit waring - removal of content w/o explanation. Adakiko (talk) 07:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep removing the logo. Vestrian24Bio 07:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP disruptive editing and edit-warring. Jingiby (talk) 09:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary protection: source and content deletion by muliple IPs, likely socks. Adakiko (talk) 09:52, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nationalists keep on changing the name as they did since forever 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 10:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nationalism at its peak 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 10:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
[[1]]
- Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International Police Organization (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: some users are editing every time that the International Police Organization is affiliated with far right extremist without any prof and is hurting verry much the image of the organization . We can bring a lot of proof of our activities that are for helping people in cybersecurity and cyberbullying Stoica Alexandru Adrian (talk) 11:41, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Canadien1867 (talk) 12:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Remove Indefinitely Extended Confirmed Protection: Persistent Vandalism – The protection is no longer necessary because it has no edit auto confirmed user it has no vandalism for a long time but we wanna test if the protection is still needed but first test unprotected if it works if not then we will go back to extended confirmed protection it has no restriction at Arbitration enforcement is been a while since November 19, 2017 give a try first if not then we will go back to protection test it see if it works. 2603:7000:8100:29F1:1F8B:77CB:AD52:38FB (talk) 08:10, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
[[Cyberbot I]] I know it is protected but I'm trying to decreased by lifting the protection we will leave to administrator. 2603:7000:8100:29F1:1F8B:77CB:AD52:38FB (talk) 08:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Kendricks personal life tab was recently edited. The last person to edit was Saloni Jain22 as of now (5 hours ago). The incorrect information is under his personal life tab. "In an October 2012 interview, he stated that he once tried marijuana, but the blunt was laced with PCP". The drug last started is incorrect and should be replaced with "angel dust" or more commonly known as, cocaine. The link that is attached is a YouTube video with kendrick literally stating verbatim. he has also referenced this is two songs on his GOOD Kid MAAD city album. Once at the end of "Peer Pressure" and again in m.a.a.d city he refers to it making him "foam at the mouth". You're welcome 2601:98D:C182:7000:6040:86B0:1916:8063 (talk) 22:04, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Note: PCP is angel dust. Worgisbor (Talking's fun!) 22:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:49, 1 March 2025 (UTC) |
| 15 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:26, 1 March 2025 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request AutoPatrolled rights. I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia since December 2020, with over 1,090 total edits (945 live edits) and 154 articles created (121 currently live). Reasons for requesting AutoPatrolled rights:
I appreciate your time and consideration. Thank you! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 10:36, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am requesting *auto-patrolled rights* to streamline my contributions. Over the past month, I have actively edited Wikipedia, focusing on *Politics, Infrastructure, and Technology in India*. With 100+ constructive edits, I have developed a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s policies and formatting. Granting me *autopatrolled status* Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, VortexPhantom (talk) 11:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Great editor, with high quality articles.Has written 32 live articles. Xiphoid Vigour ⚔Duel⚔ 15:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
I have created 90 articles, of which 81 are above stub-class and none deleted (to my recollection). I was previously denied autopatrolled permissions for not having enough articles that didn't go through AfC; I've since created 14 articles without utilizing it. Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC) Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I wish to get back to sorting stubs and other small fixes. I have had access in the past but guess it was removed during my break away from wikipedia Waacstats (talk) 23:57, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: I will need the rights so I can attempt to make changes in semi-protected articles and I think my situation is a little different. After many years of use without contribution I've decided to contribute and take care of some outdated images and animations (I'm a 2D/3D Generalist). I do not plan to edit any other content, including text - unless it's necessary for some reason, like a description that has to be updated. I plan to start with English articles first, even though it's not my native language. I will just take care of the pictures, but I would have to make 10 of them, according to the rules I've read, and if the YouTube video I watched on the subject is right, I would have to do it in a quick succession (7 days according to "Wikipedia Basics" - "The Boring Voice" channel). It's not possible for me, I'm sorry. The plan is to take care of the most popular articles, but with very outdated images. They are stuck there because there are no free-to-use alternatives or nobody cares enough to update them. I would like to replace them with custom made images released for free for everyone via Wikimedia. I'm somewhat familiar with copyright laws and I understand some of the updates might not be welcome or rejected and that's okay. Images will still be available on Wikimedia in multiple sizes, formats and versions - depending on what is being done. Then I can try updating something else, but I need to be sure I'm somewhat ready to start and have a green light. I don't want to worry if what I'm working on is going to be rejected by an automated message. I also don't want to feel like I cheat and force myself to make 10 careless updates. I will get burnt out. I understand it's also a learning process and proof that someone understands the basics of coding, formatting and is not malicious (at least not yet), but I will do my best to research and test things before making any changes. Creating 3D renders takes time and I will also be limited by my tools and the resources I purchased, all with different licenses. I still have a lot to read and get familiar with, but it's okay. There is time. And I know this account looks fishy and I haven't logged in for 16 years, but the name change ticket went surprisingly well, even though I probably missed a few checkmarks. If for whatever reason this request has to be denied (and I know "the vast majority of requests here are denied" and I know about "WP:FFU"), then it's okay and I will do the next suggested thing ("Template:Edit semi-protected"). I'm happy the wall exists, but unhappy it has to. Thank you for your time. Czerniawskimc (talk) 21:28, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
It has been four days and I've made 13 edits and I haven't been confirmed yet? 88BeeGee88 (talk) 06:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
Hi, the team I asking the rights for the extended security of the Hindi Wikipedia articles which are heavily edited and ensuring the security of the same. If you find me capable please grant me the Extended Confirmed rights. Thank you Wikiuser829 (talk) 11:32, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
I enjoy making minor edits, especially using the "Random articles" button and in articles relating to aviation disasters. Unfortunately, I don't have much time to edit, so it will take me a while to get up to 500 edits. Considering the recent changes to America's politics, I expect that we'll start seeing a lot more aviation disasters, and I would really appreciate the ability to work on articles about them without needing to go through edit requests. I understand that this is an unusual request, so I'm willing to undergo a voluntary restriction preventing me from making non-minor edits on EC articles until I reach 500 edits to prove good faith. Less than half of the WikiProject Aviation aviation accident task force have edited in the last 6 months, so I think my contributions in this area would be helpful. JarJarInksTones essay 14:10, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for event coordinator |
|---|
Event coordinator
I would like to request event coordinator rights on the English Wikipedia because I will be hosting multiple Edit-A-Thons in Hamburg, Germany. They will focus on the English pages of common pages about the city of Hamburg. Most of my event attendees currently do not possess Wikipedia accounts and I would need to create them on-demand for everyone who would be interested taking part in such Edit-A-Thon VancityRothaug (talk + contribs) 16:08, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
Hello again, I was granted NPR for the January backlog drive, and reviewed 48.4 in total. I was planning to do a lot more, but I quickly learnt it's best to stick with subjects I'm familiar with, mainly English football, so didn't end up doing much beyond that. Anyway, I'd like to continue reviewing. I doubt I'll be a prolific reviewer, but otherwise happy to handle what I come across, and participate in future backlog drives as required. I only had a couple of re-reviews, so I welcome any admin to check over other reviews I've made. Thanks. CNC (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to try and help out as a new page reviewer. Want to do a bit more than Editing, Destubbing and creating BLPs! Davidindia (talk) 09:37, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors. I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations. I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Requesting extension of new page reviewer permissions. Hoping to continue contributing to reviews of newly created pages. I can also review new pages in the Croatian and Ukrainian page spaces Barrettsprivateers (talk) 21:14, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting the renewal of NPP reviewer rights following participating in the January 2025 backlog drive to continue contributing to NPP reviewing. Ewhite31 (talk) 10:24, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
My temporary new page reviewer rights have recently expired. I'd like to request a renewal of the rights. I believe I have demonstrated enough experience in reviewing new pages so far. Thank you! Skyshiftertalk 18:35, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to participate in new pages reviewing having garnered some experience in the relevant areas of editing outlined in the guideline for granting this user right. Thank you. Mekomo (talk) 10:11, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Contributor for around 4 years, nearly 4,000 edits, 30+ articles created. mostly working within the spheres of current and historical Catholicism in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Substantial expansions on a number of articles and lists, no articles deleted. Applied around 2 years ago, got dinged for insufficient proofreading on an article mostly pulled from a public domain text. Maximilian775 (talk) 18:52, 24 February 2025 (UTC) Maximilian775 (talk) 18:52, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to request New Page Reviewer rights. I have been actively contributing on Wikipedia. I have been reviewing and improving new articles, ensuring they meet Wikipedia’s guidelines. Having the New Page Reviewer rights will allow me to contribute more effectively by patrolling new pages and maintaining content standards.— Fahads1982talk/contrib 21:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: I have a strong background in mechanical engineering, particularly in solid mechanics. If you need any help reviewing new pages in this area I can help :) AHFrederiksen (talk) 20:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I was granted New page reviewer rights for a period of two months on 14 January 2025, set to expire on 13 March. I would appreciate if this could be extended and made permanent. Thank you. QEnigma talk 01:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
I understand pending change policies well, in addition to my knowledge of general Wikipedia editing policy/procedure. I would like to further contribute in this way. Thanks. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 00:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to help in Reviewing pending changes as I'm familiar with all the policies and guidelines for RPC and I'm doing constructive edit regularly. AgerJoy 07:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Requesting rights to intervene against vandalism. I've been patrolling recent changes & have reviewed a lot of changes. I was declined last time as my account was new. I'm familiar with all the policies of vandalism and pending changes. Regards, Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 09:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I edit Wikipedia quite frequently, particularly fighting against vandalism and I think that if I had this right, it would enable me to be a more helpful and better user. I would like to be able to confirm these requests as I think that it would just be another way for me to be helpful. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
I have been a active contributor to Wikipedia for quite a few months now, actively editing and creating articles related to Texas politicians. I'm also well aware about the Wikipedia policy on vandalism. I see a lot of requests on articles that I edit miscellaneously in my free time, however I don't have the permission. WormEater13 (talk) 22:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting for Pending changes reviewer, I've been familiarized all the guidlines like WP:NPOV, WP:!, WP:OR, WP:VERI and WP:BLP. I have a rollback and using that to fight vandalism in Wikipedia. ROY is WAR Talk! 14:46, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting Pending Changes Reviewer status so I can help speed up and decrease the number of pending changes to articles. I know the rules about vandalism, verifiability, editing guidelines, and everything else. Danoniinho (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to have my rights restored as I am interested in countervandalism and patrolling again. I had myself requested removal at [8]. Thanks. Svartava (talk) 14:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request **Pending Changes Reviewer** rights. I have been an active editor since December 2020, with **1,094 total edits** (945 live). In the past year, I have made **345 edits**, primarily contributing to content creation, sourcing, and maintenance. I have created **154 articles** (121 currently live), ensuring compliance with Wikipedia's content guidelines. I am familiar with **WP:VANDALISM, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV,** and other core policies. I aim to help review pending changes on semi-protected pages to ensure accuracy and reliability. Thank you for your time and consideration! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 10:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
after 2 years I got alot of editing, wanna test another experience. thanks QalasQalas (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
There have been too many times when multiple rounds of improper edits/vandalism on pages I follow have required individual reversions, so having the rollback permission would be useful. Coining (talk) 04:09, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I mainly edit on pages related to sportscar racing, where unregistered users often edit multiple small things (often going against the page consensus at the time) in the span of a few minutes. This role would be particularly useful to be able to rollback these edits at once. I check my watchlist multiple times a day and I am quite active in general. Thanks for your time. SportscarFan2004 (talk) 09:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I request rollback rights. I need rollback rights to more conveniently eliminate vandalism in English wiki. In addition, I have rollback rights on Russian wiki and I am also actively eliminating cross-wiki vandalism. I have read the rollback policy and am ready to follow it. Oostpulus (talk) 08:35, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
I've been actively Recent Changes patrolling for a little over three months now. I've read WP:Rollback. I would like to try out Huggle for use in fighting vandalism, and I pledge to follow the rollback guidelines. I recognize that the primary use of rollback is to revert vandalism. Gelasin (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Would like to obtain rollback rights to use AntiVandal, as patrolling recent changes traditionally can get unorganized with a massive amount of tabs very quickly. I have been patrolling recent changes for around 2 years. Parksfan1955 (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
I am continuously patrolling recent changes and fighting against anti-vandalism. I hope this right and the tools available with the permission will help me to do more anti-vandal work more effectively. I will not abuse this tool and use it civilly and won't do edit warring and 3RR violations. YuiFujimoto (talk) 16:51, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
I am kindly requesting rollback permissions for myself, in order to revert vandalism using the Huggle tool. E6400 (talk) 14:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I requested for this right a few weeks ago, which MusikBot will flag up. The reason I was declined was mainly because I had not met the 200 mainspace edit threshold needed for my application to go through. A concern was also raised about one of my edits, saying that I had jumped to conclusions about an editor a bit quickly and had gone too fast with the warnings. I am now trying to be better at using the warning system more fairly and helpfully and I hope that I have addressed this concern. Most of my edits on Wikipedia have been fighting against vandalism and with this tool, I will be able to fight it more efficiently. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting rollback rights to enhance my ability to fight vandalism. I Would like to try out AntiVandal tool. I'm active in recent changes, pending changes, and new pages patrol, and I understand rollback is for clear vandalism cases. I'll use it responsibly. Here is my Undo/Revert History : [10] UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 14:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request rollback rights. I have made many reverts using undo and I use SWviewer/Twinkle to revert vandalism (see this to see my reverts). I understand the policies of rollback and have thoroughly read through the rollback policies and guidlines. I hope that I would receive the rights (permenant or for a probation period).— Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I spend a good deal of time on RecentChanges, and edit on PC as well as mobile (mostly mobile). RedWarn does not work on mobile, and Twinkle can give me trouble sometimes. As such, I'm requesting rights so that mobile editing is a little easier for me. Thank you! 🙂 (NOTE: Forgot to add that rollback seems to be faster than Twinkle. That would be useful.) (Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 20:23, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |