User talk:Cactusisme
| This is Cactusisme's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
You declined a redirect, asking for a source .. but ..
[edit]the source was already supplied in the request, for Zioness. Exactly as is the norm in redirect requests. Relevant aspects below.
Target of redirect: Amanda Berman
Reason: She is the founder and director of Zioness, which does not have its own article
Source (if applicable): [1] "Amanda Berman, Founder of Zioness ..."
2603:7000:2101:AA00:3007:95C2:F1D4:565E (talk) 19:35, 6 March 2025 (UTC) ...
Declined. The title you suggested seems like an unlikely search term. Could you provide a source showing that it is a commonly used alternative name or related topic? (Zioness) Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Kindly reconsider and approve. Thank you. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:BC5F:5D0F:C933:525E (talk) 19:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- Where did you post this on? Please provide diff link Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 03:31, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- On the request redirect page. We ran into another problem very much like this recently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Redirects/2025-03#Redirect_request:_Zioness,_Zioness_Movement 2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 (talk) 04:39, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Please submit a new request Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:32, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Is that really necessary? I did it correctly the first time. It seems like needless hoops for editors to have to resubmit requests that have been properly submitted in the first instance. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 (talk) 18:50, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- @2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 If you don't submit a new requests, I can't do anything. It doesn't take that much time. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 22:17, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Is that really necessary? I did it correctly the first time. It seems like needless hoops for editors to have to resubmit requests that have been properly submitted in the first instance. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 (talk) 18:50, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Please submit a new request Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:32, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- On the request redirect page. We ran into another problem very much like this recently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Redirects/2025-03#Redirect_request:_Zioness,_Zioness_Movement 2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 (talk) 04:39, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- I will do it. Thanks.But it does strike me that editors should not have to do the work of finding the ref to the error when the specifics were pointed out. And refile. When the error was not theirs. If it does not take much time, I was thinking the person making the error could themselves make the submission that "doesn't take much time" . --2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 (talk) 00:25, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Rollback granted
[edit]
Hi Cactusisme. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Joyous! Noise! 03:10, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Bulbinella rossii
[edit]Hi Cactusisme. I would like to remind you about the ongoing review on the Bulbinella rossii article. I understand you might be busy (or focused on other articles at the moment). I will likely be off-wiki this weekend. Thanks. Alexeyevitch(talk) 20:40, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Will take a look Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 04:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC)