User:TexasAndroid
Computer programmer from San Antonio, Texas.
Reverter of vandalism, and wiki-link cleaner. (I'm no great author of Wiki pages, but I'm good at cleaning up other people's messes. :))
My barnstar collection is here.
Current Projects
 |
| en | This user is a native speaker of the English language. |
 | This user is a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit. |
 | This user lives in the U.S. State of Texas. |
.svg){kind=small} | This user is male. |
 | This user participates in WikiProject Categories to improve Wikipedia categorization. |
 | This user has created a global account. |
|
This user plays the Pokémon RPGs and other related video games. |
.svg){kind=icon}
|
This user uses Google Maps. |
 | This editor is a Master Editor IV and is entitled to display this Orichalcum Editor Star. |
| 100k+ |
Current Outstanding admin load
Administrative backlog
Reports
- 188.120.118.136 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:57, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- 2604:f6c0:5054:a800:25d4:8dbd:be41:240e (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:18, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:8003:4e31:5700:3ca2:2981:9727:6c4e (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:35, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- 119.160.142.51 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:44, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- WenDayFor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:26, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:246:cf00:3880:45e3:7150:d1a7:3285 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:11, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Icedshakenespresso (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. User is not here to edit constructively; has continued to make personal, accusatory statements on their talk page, despite continued notice of content, not contributor being discussed; user also felt to be bullied/singled out, which I do not feel was being done, and did apologise if it felt as if this was being done (which was not). livelikemusic (TALK!) 04:20, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. ~Lofty abyss 04:26, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Greenlimbs Media (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- SmithyFC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- CollegeReview (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- UppiliVentures (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Metalandmindabuse (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "abuse" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:40, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- MN.Capgemini.se (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:00, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:00, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- looks like MN is initials and therefore this is COI but compliant as a username Secretlondon (talk) 19:39, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Bollocksforlife (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "bollock" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:20, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- User221hdhsjwuwieueurhdoao (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Wax.on.fck.off (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Idahopolicy (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Stephbhoy1916undefeatedarmy (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Blackhoodnoob13579 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- 2592marketing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Mathsschools1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Georgelovespoopiedoopie (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Poop" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:30, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nicoismyusername (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Samrat .official 987 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Bobbycoons2025 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "coons" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:10, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- ArtHistoryHistoiredelart (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional and disruptive username. Corporate name, per Wikipedia:Teahouse#Conflict of Interest and Creation of a Wikipedia Page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:27, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- I think this is just COI/PAID and shared account, unless they have an organisation called that. Secretlondon (talk) 07:21, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- TKPRcomms (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Promotional username. See COI disclaimer on user page. ScalarFactor (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Auralith LTD (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Cyrobyte (talk) 23:00, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Wedonotcare (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Implies shared use. No response to post about that on their talk page. Dorsetonian (talk) 06:44, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. We don't usually no-warning no-discussion block if potential shared use is the only concern. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- To be clear, I did already attempt to discuss with the user:[1] Dorsetonian (talk) 09:34, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think this really implies shared use anyway. Secretlondon (talk) 13:24, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Dorsetonian (talk) 13:33, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think this really implies shared use anyway. Secretlondon (talk) 13:24, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- To be clear, I did already attempt to discuss with the user:[1] Dorsetonian (talk) 09:34, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- SEO-CY3 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and disruptive username. "SEO" ????. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 18:33, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- TeradyneInc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. This account has only ever edited Teradyne and presumably represents the company, adding several large sections of unsourced text (though it hasn't been active since 2020). Iiii I I I (talk) 20:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- PragmatisticUK (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Promotional username. See COI declaration on user page. ScalarFactor (talk) 22:38, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Remsemense (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Remsense + "semen". jlwoodwa (talk) 22:43, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. The user is editing constructively. I'm surprised to see a user with an erection in their username making a report of semen. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Cabayi (talk) 05:58, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- IO peackeeperbot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Tbh, we could probably do with one of these. Knitsey (talk) 04:40, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: I am requesting semi-protection for this article due to repeated disruptive edits and unsourced changes made by anonymous IP users. These edits include the reversion of verified and properly sourced content, as well as the addition of misleading or speculative information—particularly regarding player transfers and kit updates. The IP user(s) have continue to ignore Wikipedia’s content guidelines and reliable sourcing policy. Semi-protection would help maintain the article's accuracy and prevent further vandalism or bad-faith edits. Reez95 (talk) 00:15, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined Looks like a single editor. Discuss on the talk page and seek WP:CONSENSUS. If the editing is disruptive warn them and then take the matter to ANI or ANEW as appropriate. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:55, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Dear Wikipedia Administrator,
I’m writing to express concern about an article related to my community and personal contributions. Recently, my name and historical context were removed from the article, and it appears the content has been altered to promote another individual or narrative. This includes:
Renaming the article and removing original references
Replacing my name with someone else's, often without proper citations
Redirecting attention to unrelated individuals or sources (e.g., Reddit posts)
This feels like an intentional hijacking of the article, and it undermines the cultural and historical accuracy of the topic. I respectfully request a review of the edit history and restoration of the original, verifiable content. I’m happy to provide sources and documentation to support the original version.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Sincerely, Sayed Sajjad Hussain Musavi Kashifrazashah (talk) 01:47, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined @Kashifrazashah You are the only editor to have made substantive edits to that draft page. Further, if you are writing about yourself, see WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY for why that's a bad ideaj. —C.Fred (talk) 01:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:59, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism, misinformation plus edit wars 92.176.232.50 (talk) 04:45, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism and misinformation 92.176.232.50 (talk) 04:45, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism misinformation 92.176.232.50 (talk) 04:46, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP disrupting editing, including disrupting the normal form of the table, keeping making such edit even after my warning and then undoing it themselves. 特磨 (talk) 05:43, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:29, 21 July 2025 (UTC) |
| 14 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 05:44, 25 July 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
7-year vet of the site, multiple GANs and DYKs, 51 mainspace articles created of which 49 are live (G6 and G7 deletions for the other two). Etzedek24 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
I have been on Wikipedia for more than a decade, and I truly feel that it is one of my great passions in life. I have more than 30,000 edits, and I am credited with more than 300 articles that are not Redirects or Disambiguation pages. (I personally take credit for more than 100 of these, which did not originate as Redirect pages.) Although I continue to propose Draft pages to this day when I am not 100% confident myself about notability, I frequently go straight to the mainspace and have made a number of articles that have been significant in some form or field, with my particular focus being on film industry and electoral politics pages. Recently, I redirected a few thousand Supreme Court of the United States cases to the case volumes in which they were listed. It was a large-scale project for me, but in the end it was decided that redlinks would be better for promoting caseload knowledge, something that I agreed to and I believe will continue to service our Wikipedia community. For this reason, it might appear that I have a large number of deleted pages, but this is almost exclusively due to this particular project; I had an edit deletion rate of less than 2%, and I had not had a page that I created taken down in years, not since I was a far more novice editor. (You can read more about that SCOTUS discussion here.) I believe that being autopatrolled will continue to allow me to contribute to the Wikipedia community, and that is why I am reaching out to ask for permissions. I am happy to answer any questions or improve any articles that I have created if there is anything noticeable that needs help. Although I have long been looking to increase my permissions and role in the community, I quite frankly have always had impostor syndrome stop me from asking, but a bit of encouragement from Liz made me try. Thank you so much! PickleG13 (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Regular article creator and Did you know? contributor who demonstrates understanding of the notability guidelines on a number of topics. No copyright violation troubles, and spot-checks for text–source integrity do indeed check out. Note their creation Not-deer was deleted at AfD earlier this year; I'm not inclined to give this too much weight here as it seems to have been a notability edge case, and experienced participants in that discussion gave reasonable arguments both for and against deletion. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:08, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
I have created over 25 new articles that meet notability guidelines and follow Wikipedia standards and guideliness. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s core content policies (NPOV, V, NOR) and believe that being autopatrolled will reduce the workload on new page patrollers. Thank you in advance Lanceloth345 (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Met this user at today's Event:NYC 400 Wiknic and Edit-A-Thon with Washington Square Park, and he lamented the delay in getting his articles patrolled despite being a prolific article writer. After reviewing their work, granting the autopatrolled right would be well-deserved. Three of their article creations from 2012 were deleted as non-notable malls. His 2014 creation of Ancient Theatre of Mytilene was deleted within days under WP:G12 which is not good but also more than a decade ago. Since then, he has written 221 live articles, 100 of which are C-class, across subjects including companies, biographies, and art pieces with adherence to our notability guidelines. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 19:39, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Been an active user for a few years, created 25+ articles with the only two deletions being mistakenly created redirects (due to a script error). Multiple GAs and FLs. I understand enwiki notability guidelines thoroughly.ULPS (talk • contribs) 22:51, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I have create multiple articles which are rated well and want to tool to simplify editing and maintaining them and other articles. Dahawk04 Talk 💬 16:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Request AWB permissions to assist with cleanup across Wikiprojects I participate in, including Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies and Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand, especially in cases where New Zealand English is used inconsistently on articles about New Zealand. Nixleovel (He/They) (Talk • Contribs) 01:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
|---|
Extended confirmed |
| Requests for event coordinator |
|---|
Event coordinator
Hi there! Requesting these rights so that I can use the Campaign Events extension in the course of my work for WMUK. In addition may use these for supporting volunteer events. I currently have en.wiki Event Coordinator rights on my volunteer account user:lirazelf, and I have Campaign Events rights on meta under my work account. I'm familiar with the usage and restrictions. Sara Thomas (WMUK) (talk) 16:58, 24 July 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I am interested in helping to eliminate the backlog, particularly for articles involving Chinese, Japanese, or Korean-language sources—languages I am familiar with—that often remain stuck for long periods due to language barriers. I have experience at AFD and AFC, and while the P&G vary across Wikiprojects, I have served as an NPP on zhwiki for four years. —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 08:57, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting this flag to help patrol new articles and drafts. My main focus would be reviewing quality content based on English Wikipedia and marking CSD promotional/advertisement/spam content. Also, identify copyright violations if any when discovered. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 09:07, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm reapplying for NPR rights as my three-month trial is about to expire. I unfortunately haven't done that much patrolling during my trial as I've mostly been working in other areas, but hopefully my AfC, CSD, AfD and article creation records are enough to show that I have a sufficient understanding of policies and guidelines to be trusted with this right. If approved, I'm definitely hoping to be more active at NPP in the future to help clear the backlog. MCE89 (talk) 02:33, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I’m re-applying for NPP permission after a three-month trial. I haven’t been a super prolific reviewer (90 articles + 38 redirects) but I’ve also done more content creation, de-stubbing, and AfD which I hope also helps demonstrate my understanding of the key principles. I’ve found NPP quite rewarding and would love to continue working. Zzz plant (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Greetings, I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for the past one year, during which I have created and edited serval articles in line with Wikipedia’s content policies and guidelines. I was previously granted New Page Reviewer permissions on a temporary basis but was unable to make full use of the tools at that time, due to other commitments. I am now available to contribute to the project, particularly in helping to reduce the backlog of unreviewed articles, Thank you for considering my request. (Primefac) 2RDD (talk) 11:30, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting for this permission to help address the backlog of unreviewed pages and to ensure the quality of new content submitted uses encyclopedic language and that the content is accurate and neutral. I have participated in hundreds of AfDs and during that time I have developed a solid understanding of WP:GNG, RS requirements (WP:SIGCOV), and other relevant policies for reviewing pages. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:23, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
I received notification that my NPP rights will expire on July 26, 2025. If you believe I have performed satisfactorily during my NPP probationary period. Please renew my position as an NPP reviewer. Thank you. Bakhtar40 (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I am applying to renew my patroller user right after a notification on my talk page. I'm not sure what I am supposed to write here, but feel free to ask me questions 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request New Page Reviewer rights to support efforts in curating new content and reducing the existing backlog. Over the course of my contributions, I’ve developed a strong understanding of key content policies, including WP:N, WP:RS, and WP:BLP, and I’ve actively participated in AfD discussions and improved multiple articles. My goal is to ensure that newly created pages meet Wikipedia's standards for neutrality, sourcing, and notability. As an AfD participant, I’ve gained experience in identifying promotional or non-notable content and would like to expand my activity towards this area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Lorraine Crane (talk) 04:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
I was granted patroller rights on 30 April for the May backlog drive. I would like either an extension or permanent rights as I have continued reviewing at both NPP and AfC. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 06:04, 25 July 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
While volunteering WP:UAA I find creations that should be in draftspace instead of userspace. Thus, I move using a script that requires additional steps to make a soft-redirect after moving from sandboxes/userspaces. See the log here. I kindly request this flag as it will help me to avoid leaving an unnecessary redirect as discussed at User_talk:Agent_VII#About_your_move. I also intent to use this tool if granted for WP:PMRC#3, WP:PMRC#7 when going through Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 09:58, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting to be granted the page mover right because I’m active at New Page Patrol. With this, I'll be able to move these articles without leaving a redirect would save somebody else the trouble of deleting these tagged redirects. I believe this right will be benefit for me to contribute the project (I already have it at my native wiki). If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks in advance. Hasan (talk) 12:54, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
I have been occasionally closing discussions found at WP:RM and this often results in me making requests to WP:RM/TR. All of my requests at WP:RM/TR have gone smoothly, bar two, which I learnt from and are now more cautious, especially if there are a lot pages involved in the discussion. Additionally I do an occasional bit of WP:NPP, including moving pages to draft (see my Draftify log). If granted the right I will primarily use it for round-robin moves and supressing redirects when moving articles to draft (WP:PMRC#4 and WP:PMRC#6) in order to reduce work for other editors. Full-disclosure: I had an edit warring block three and a half months ago which was lifted, by the imposing admin, an hour after it was imposed. See Special:Permalink/1284178028#April 2025. I allowed myself to get sucked into edit warring when I should have taken the editor (now banned and who I have helped in identifying sock puppets of, refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WikiAdvisor) to a noticeboard. TarnishedPathtalk 15:48, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Requesting access to assist with the backlog in helping to ensure pending edits meet the criteria of the Wikipedia policies & guidelines. Eulersidentity (talk) 10:13, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to request PCR rights as I've been very active in creating and substantially improving My Little Pony and mathematics articles over the last few months. I'm very familiar with the content and vandalism policies and I'd love to be able to do my part to help Wikipedia stay free of inappropriate edits—I've already been doing this for articles that are within my watchlist. Thank you for your consideration! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 02:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting for the pending changes reviewer rights to help review pending changes. Allblessed (talk) 08:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Desire to possess the ability to approve or reject protected article edits, having reviewed and become familiar with Wikipedia copyright and vandalism rules and guidelines; and having demonstrated a responsible record of stewardship of articles and related media over the course of this account. Thank you for your consideration and any feedback on additional qualifying criteria. OceanLoop (talk) 00:06, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting the pending changes reviewer right because I would like to ensure that articles with pending changes are regularly reviewed. I have substantial experience with reviewing recent changes and administrative processes regarding vandalism and page protection and am an active editor. Thanks! Cyrobyte (talk) 01:37, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I've had some experience with reverting vandalism and am confident with Special:RecentChanges and Wikipedia's internal policies on vandalism. I'm requesting rollback rights to be able to fix obvious vandalism more effectively. Nixleovel (He/They) (Talk • Contribs) 06:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I need the rollback rights to help revert vandalism and bad faith edits. Allblessed (talk) 08:21, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Fighting against vandalism in my part time. Ḅ̵̼̝̭͔͆̿́͌̚l̷͖̯͚͕̭̑͑̀͑͘a̵͍̘̥̟̪͗̈́̈́͒͠â̷̮͎̲̪̥̿̐͗͝d̵̰͓̠̘̫͒̎̽͊̉a̷̛̬̜̲̲͙̅͛͝͠ (talk) 20:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
I have been reverting and warning vandals for a while now. As evidence for that you can see I have created ~220 user talk pages. I would find rollback particularly useful for persistent/spammy vandals. Thank you. Sophocrat (talk) 21:40, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
As a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wildfire, I frequently patrol pages about wildfires, and undo vandalism. I frequently check Special:RecentChanges for vandalism. I have been active on Wikipedia for more the two years and have made plenty of reverts. I have made 283 edits in the past 6 days alone. CostalCal (talk) 09:30, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
Increasing number of edits into the template space after being an article contributor for years. Running across more protected templates, such as Infobox gymnast, for which I'd need access. Already have much experience editing and creating templates, as well as sandbox to production edits. GauchoDude (talk) 20:46, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
@Primefac: (permalink) Re-applying for the permission, expiring on 24 July 2025. (edit requests) — Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 20:22, 19 July 2025 (UTC) |
Immediate requests
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 1 |
| Requests for unblock | 116 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 1 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 46 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 2 |
Deletion
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 688 |
| Templates for deletion | 142 |
| Categories for deletion | 131 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 54 |
| All redirects for discussion | 280 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 17 |
| Possible copyright violations | 41 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 303 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 24 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 0 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 256 |
Image copyright problems
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 499 |
| Unknown copyright status | 32 |
| Unknown source | 28 |
| No non-free use rationale | 3 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 15 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 7 |
Page protection
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,266 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 455 |
| Protected against vandalism | 4 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,634 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 34,053 | 0.48 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 6,275 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,332 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 41,752 | 0.59 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 11,622 | 0.17 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 553,229 | 7.87 |
| All articles lacking sources | 48,152 | 0.69 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 76 | 0.01 |
| All articles needing additional references | 499,115 | 7.1 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 4,838 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 107,249 | 1.53 |
| All articles with dead external links | 300,343 | 4.27 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 132 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 21 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles to be merged | 1,259 | 0.02 |
| All articles to be split | 813 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 1 | - |
| Stub categories | 20,298 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 271 | 0 |
| All orphaned articles | 54,227 | 0.77 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 2,163 | 0.03 |
| All articles with style issues | 19,605 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,684 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 16,620 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 440 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 3,924 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,797 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 0 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 7 |
| All articles to be expanded | 65,454 |
Special pages
| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |