User talk:Blaada

Kashika language

I've copied your comment to Talk:Bhojpuri_language. Please feel free to continue the discussion there. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello, I'm Benison. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mirzapur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Benison (Beni · talk) 01:10, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mirzapur district, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Benison (Beni · talk) 01:11, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Bhojpuri region, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 09:25, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sir, i would sure look at that. Sorry for my mistake. Blaada (talk) 10:05, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Tamils. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Obi2canibe (talk) 12:00, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changing content that is not supported by the included sources

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:25, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir, I would improve myself. Blaada (talk) 13:34, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mirzapuri

The article Mirzapuri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mirzapuri does not seem to have historical name of any language of dialect. The reference that are cited in this article, primarily talk about Awadhi and not Mirzapuri. Additionally, most of these references seem to be blogs and can't relied. Moreover, the article cites one "survey" i.e. linguistic survey of India by G.A. Grierson. In that survey, region of Mirzapur speaks the Western Standard Bhojpuri and not Awadhi. Additionally, "Mirzapuri" name is not mentioned in it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eastern Hindi languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Powari. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Languages Of Purvanchal

@Garudam you are cordially invited to discuss about languages of Purvanchal. Thanks Blaada (talk) 16:43, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maa Vindhyavasini University (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maa Vindhyavasini University and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:05, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blaada! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:05, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That article wasn't created by me but I saw it in draft and requested for review because the article about the university was in my locality. I admit the informations were of advertising nature. I would created a new draft in formal way and citations next time. Thank you. Blaada (talk) 17:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

In these edits, you removed sourced material and replace it with unsoured material. You don't get to add new material with a pledge to find sources "later." User-generated sites like "Alchetron" cannot be used as sources. Simply adding a link to the main page of "mymaati.org" doesn't accomplish anything either; any new material added must be directly supported by a reference. If you add unsourced material again or removed well-sourced material without a good explanation, you will be blocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:19, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on collecting citations. The history section I removed was a copy of History of Prayagraj, which has no relations with Purvanchal. I assured that on talk page before removing history section. Good evening Blaada (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with the removal of the History section, as it's not clear how that directly relates to Purvanchal. Stop adding material without sources - you don't get to add sources "later." You are very close to being blocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:28, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sir, I would improve myself. Blaada (talk) 14:32, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]