User:Keeper76/dashboard
| userpage | talk | dashboard | rfa | contribs | subpages | freqtemps | afd/o | archive |
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
Administrative backlog
AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
- Jhas50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:09, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- 68.97.141.207 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:28, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Khadoh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:09, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- 202.137.162.59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- ShamanCapital (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:36, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Poopdecktheoverlord (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Pakdam Pakdai (diff): Adding unsourced content after final warning to not add unsourced content. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:58, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Skywatcher68
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:53, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Skywatcher68
- 98.245.158.135 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) 3RR and refusal to engage in dialogue. Sweetpool50 (talk) 21:55, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:59, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- 74.47.34.229 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Obvious evasion of 3 month block on neighboring IP 74.47.32.111 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). See User:Beyond My Ken/Bad copyediting IP for more. MrOllie (talk) 23:03, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Downzyisaliar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On DJ Ashba: nothere, SPA. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:28, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- 149.108.169.203/18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Long term-abuse, see [1] Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:32, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 0 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 3 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 8 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 48 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 3 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Hcdestroyer (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "destroy" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Tmfaustin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. I've nominated both of these user's articles for AfD due to notability concerns, however I wanted to also report this user to WP:UAA. Although the user has made these edits a long time ago (during the time period of 2014-2019), the user has only edited Wikipedia about themselves/their non-profit organization titled The Miracle Foundation (which suits their username, Tmfaustin). Their user page also further proves this. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. WormEater13, we don't bother to block accounts that have not edited since 2019. Cullen328 (talk) 00:15, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Ips.delhi (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. IPS means Indian Police Service. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 16:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Valentino Massanga (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Self-promotional user page and username. Nahida 🌷 19:12, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. Real names are permitted unless they imply that the user is someone that they're not. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- LibertyStation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). Appears to represent Liberty Station, San Diego. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 21:12, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Cartigalegalfunding (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:25, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Carooline Freeman College (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Caroline Freeman College. Referentis (talk) 23:54, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Amarisforstatesenate (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Username is promoting a specific candidate for a specific US election and is also using their sandbox for promotional edits. Nahida 🌷 00:22, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite semi-protection: GENSEX topic area. GnocchiFan (talk) 07:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:30, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- I have, nonetheless, put a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:08, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – This article has been edited by three users who say they are respectively the subject of the article and two of his colleagues. they have added unsourced information, and four times this month they have added copyrighted information which has been or is being revdelled. The article has been raised at CoIN and there is discussion on the article's Talk page and on the user pages of the three accounts. We don't seem to be getting anywhere, so I would be grateful if page protection could be considered. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 20:42, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Note: Sockpuppet investigation opened — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:14, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined Let's defer to that for now. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 21:08, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined This article does not need to be protected. As an unreferenced BLP, it needs to be deleted. I will therefore be prodding it when I'm done here. Daniel Case (talk) 21:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – incorrect information being added and vandalism. - FitIndia Talk (Admin on Commons) 21:10, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. All recent disruptors. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This article has been previously temporarily protected. This article is on the Department of Government Efficiency, a highly controversial subject in the United States -- it should be semi-protected. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 21:29, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And that's close to an argument for pre-emptive protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 21:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already warned them once. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs adding citation needed tag to sourced content without explanation. XxTechnicianxX (talk) 22:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unhelpful IP edits. Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being targeted due to a trending Reddit post [2]. Alxeedo ゐ talk 23:00, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unhelpful IP edits. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:06, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There's currently a dedicated campaign to "dox and desysop" [sic] me being run on flying saucer fan sites due to my nomination of Harald Malmgren at AfD. This has spilled over to my Talk page and, while many of the threats and insults are actually quite creative and I enjoy reading them, I'm going to be OOT for a few days and am worried about a backlog when I return. Plus, a lot of well-meaning (but unsolicited) good samaritans are reverting many of them which requires extra time and effort. I'm, therefore, hoping for a week or so of semi-protection, if possible. Thanks. Chetsford (talk) 23:31, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to reduce the protection level early if you'd like. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:48, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring, multiple IPs from Greater Washington DC. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/70.183.0.0/21 and Special:Contributions/198.24.31.113. Continuing the disruption of Special:Contributions/2600:4040:207B:A700:B1B4:8050:CBC:99F, Special:Contributions/2600:4040:2885:5C00:59F9:1294:DD2E:BF2, Special:Contributions/50.144.192.106, Special:Contributions/98.160.51.12, Special:Contributions/198.24.31.86 and Special:Contributions/198.24.21.128. Binksternet (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Last year, I requested protection (see further discussion here); that request was ultimately denied and I let it go, believing that yes, they were frustrating edits, but that it would be better to err on the side of assuming good faith. However, once again an IP editor (from a newly-used IP) has made disruptive edits:
- Removed references
- Removed references without explanation
- Adding information that is blatantly inaccurate (i.e. "end of the 2025 NBA playoffs" wouldn't occur until June)
Recently, other IP editors have just simply caused more work to be done through edits that have:
- switched a cropped image to the uncropped version
- caused baffling grammatical errors (i.e. "marking their first [season] as..." -> "marking their name [season] as")
Also, even before the massive amounts of IP edits that have been made since 2024, there has historically been vandalizing by IP editors on this page across several years; examples include: 2017 (1); 2018 (2); 2019 (4, 5); 2022 (6, 7); 2023 (8). The nature of this list being the win-loss records of NBA teams probably attracts some NBA fans to inflate or deflate a team's win-loss record based on their feelings about that team, which is something I've seen over on the analogous NFL list from my time editing that one.
I previously nominated this list for featured list status in 2022, but withdrew the nomination at the time. I think the list is currently a lot closer to FL than it was when I withdrew that nom, but the IP edits have created a lot more work to then have to clean up. Considering that in 2024, there were more unregistered edits to this list than from 2015-2023 combined, and that already in 2025, there have been more unregistered edits than in any year prior to 2024, I do not have confidence that these unregistered edits will slow down or make things easier to maintain. So, I am once again kindly requesting any form of page protection. Soulbust (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 00:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:40, 23 April 2025 (UTC) |
| 15 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 23:48, 23 April 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
- CherryPie94 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- One thing that immediately jumped out at me is some biographical articles created (e.g. Kim Na and Son Se-bin) have unsourced biographical information, such as the date of birth. This information should be sourced to ensure compliance with WP:DOB. - Aoidh (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- I've considered adding references directly next to DOB, which I did at my two most recent BLPs: Mike Kim and Lee Joon-ho. If birth information is not 100% verifiable, I play it safe (eg. Lee Seung-yoon). Per WP:DOB, links to websites maintained by the subject are generally permitted so I included Kim Na's personal website which states birth year as 1986 in the external links section. I created Son Se-bin over 5 years ago when I was much less experienced, so I don't quite recall which exact source I used for DOB (birth year seems to have been present in Star Today), so I've just amended that. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Ah I've misinterpreted that personal website policy, though it does fall under WP:ABOUTSELF, I've now also directly sourced it. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- I've considered adding references directly next to DOB, which I did at my two most recent BLPs: Mike Kim and Lee Joon-ho. If birth information is not 100% verifiable, I play it safe (eg. Lee Seung-yoon). Per WP:DOB, links to websites maintained by the subject are generally permitted so I included Kim Na's personal website which states birth year as 1986 in the external links section. I created Son Se-bin over 5 years ago when I was much less experienced, so I don't quite recall which exact source I used for DOB (birth year seems to have been present in Star Today), so I've just amended that. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Kjansen86 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoreviewer" user right.— MusikBot talk 21:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)- @LEvalyn: I went ahead and adjusted the nomination so it reflects who's actually being discussed, hope you don't mind! For future reference, you can use the "add request" link at the top of this page and replace the
{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}with whichever user you're nominating. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC) - @LEvalyn: Thank you very much for the positive evaluation of my work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate it. Kjansen86 (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- -Verso- (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hteiktinhein (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- HurricaneEdgar (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I've created 27 articles and 7 GA, including multiple ITN and DYK. I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT. Thank you! HurricaneEdgar 11:30, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Fade258 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- MerlinVtwelve (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
File mover
- Velella (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am informed by a courteous bot that my extendedmover rights expire in a few days. This is a useful capability especially for correcting article titles that do not conform to WP:MOS and to move Draft young articles which are unsourced but capable of improvement. Thanks Velella Velella Talk 20:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
- WormEater13 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! My name is WormEater13. I would like to request PCR rights. Having created multiple articles before and having made over 100 manual mainspace edits, especially for WP:BLP, I believe that I am knowledgable about Wikipedia policies such as WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:NOTABILITY. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 13:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:07, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Somajyoti (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting permission to be a Pending Changes Reviewer. I spend most of my day editing Wikipedia. I have gone through almost all the pages under Category:Wikipedia policies, including Wikipedia's policies on vandalism detection, BLP policy, NPOV, Verifiability, and copyright. I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes guideline. Please consider my request. Somajyoti ✉ 07:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had an account for 25 days. — MusikBot talk 07:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- VortexPhantom (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights on English Wikipedia to tackle with the edits protected with pending changes while patrolling in the RC, since I have rollback rights. I think I fulfill the criteria to get this right. Also, I understand the related policies to manage these edits. This would give me a better chance to work to improve Wikipedia.
Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Imwin567 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I would like to request permission to become a Pending Changes Reviewer. I have read most of Wikipedia’s core policies. I have also read and understood the guidelines outlined for the Reviewing pending changes. I believe PCR will help me accepting or rejecting edits. I also warn new editors when necessary. Imwin567 (talk) 11:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Golem08 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Greetings. I feel confident in my knowledge of Wikipedia's content policies and my ability to apply this permission effectively. Thank you. Golem08 (talk) 23:03, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- XRozuRozu (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I am an extended-confirmed rollbacker who has focused on copyediting and anti-vandalism (by patrolling RC) since joining Wikipedia in 2023. I have read WP:C and the guideline on reviewing. Thank you for considering my request. x RozuRozu • teacups 05:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Tyloxs (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I'm Tyloxs, and I'd like to request editor permissions. I've already created several articles and made over 100 manual edits. Tyloxs (talk) 12:01, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 49 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 14:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Tyloxs (Non-administrator comment) Thanks for volunteering! But, unfortunately you have 100 total edits. You are expected to have at least a 100 mainspace edits for pcr. If you don't know where to find them, you can see it here. Also, it would be better to request permissions after you are extendedconfirmed as you will be experienced enough for these userrights. (It's not compulsory to be extendedconfirmed but advised) saluere, Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 13:17, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Cactusisme (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have read policy on vandalism and understand what is vandalism and what is not, Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. I have also read the guideline on reviewing. I would like this right to help clear the pending changes backlog. I am a current rollbacker. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Loserhead4512 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello. I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I pass the WP:PCCRITERIA as far as I know, and the right would allow me to help even more to build the encyclopedia by making sure only acceptable edits are approved. Thank you for your consideration. loserhead (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- ZDRX (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I would like to request the pending changes reviewer permission. I have read most of Wikipedia’s core policies. I have also read the guidelines outlined for the Reviewing pending changes. THEZDRX (User) | (Contact) 08:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
- Imwin567 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to request rollback permissions to help combat vandalism more effectively on Wikipedia, I have been reverting vandalism for a good amount of time from recent changes using twinkle and undo. Therefore I think rollback tool can help me to assist in identifying and reverting unconstructive edits efficiently. Imwin567 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- JesusisGreat7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to assist with reverting vandalism. I’m familiar with relevant guidelines and will use the tool appropriately. Thank you for your consideration. 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 17:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done Requesting four different permissions in less than a day reeks of WP:Hat collecting. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Pppery I'm really sorry for applying all the request at once as I thought I have fufilled all the criterias, I would only like to apply for Rollback rights in order to gain a new experience so to prevent vandalism and disruptive edits, Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 08:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Valorrr (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I wish to have Rollback permissions to revert vandalism as I've been doing for at least a month with 500+ main space edits I wish to use like WP:HUGGLE and a lot more programs to help prevent vandalism. Valorrr (lets chat) 22:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 22:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Question: Valorrr: I'd still like to see you get some more experience before granting you the rollback permission as it will allow you access to some fairly powerful automated tools, as you have indicated. I can see that you have gained some experience though. To show that you understand when you can use permissions to help in a related area that usually has a backlog I'd be happy to grant you the pending changes reviewer permission so that you can help review Special:PendingChanges. Would you be okay with that? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:15, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- WormEater13 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I've been patrolling, creating, and monitoring articles on Wikipedia for months, but recently i've been able to be more active. I would like to request the rollback right - having the right would make my work patrolling Special:RecentChanges easier, as I wouldn't need to manually undo edits, but rather just be able to rollback edits directly. I use tools such as WP:RedWarn and WP:Twinkle, so having rollback rights would help me combat vandalism easier. Not to mention, I am aware of Wikipedia's core policies - such as WP:N, WP:NPOV, etc. As a newcomer myself, I am very well aware of WP:BITE and try to be as friendly and welcoming to new editors as possible. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 192 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 00:40, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Not done. I've just granted you the Pending Changes Reviewer permission from your request there. Let's see how you get on with that first and then we'll take another look again when you've made a few more edits. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Understood. Thank you so much! WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Callanecc! I apologize if disturbing, but would I be able to ask for a re-review? Since you replied, i've made about ~300 more edits (60%), and have been able to review quite a few articles with PCR. I would love to utilize the rollback feature, especially since a lot of my contributions as of right now are towards combatting vandalism. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Understood. Thank you so much! WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- JesusisGreat7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I just want to inform that I mistakenly added all requests at once I am sorry I just want to apply for rollback rights so to prevent vandalism and disruptive edits, this will help me to gain a new experience so I can contribute my best.... Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 15:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Nahida (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I feel like rollback rights will help me fight vandalism more effectively here on the English Wikipedia. I generally meet the guidelines on the top of this page (I've patrolled actively for the better part of a month now) and I believe it would help me more efficiently fight back against vandalism than being limited to Undo and base Twinkle. I try my best to correctly warn editors as well. Nahida haii 17:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 196 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 14:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Cutlass (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been dabbling with antivandalism for a bit now. I think using rollback would be helpful for this. I already have it on another project (Commons) so I understand its usefulness. Thank you for your consideration. CutlassCiera 19:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- RaschenTechner (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I request rollback rights primarily to get Huggle, AntiVandal, ORES and similar tools to fight and detect vandalism and revert unconstructive edits more easily. I currently have an edit count of 928 and have patrolled recent changes (mostly around January-February). RaschenTechner (talk) 11:58, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Template editor
- Est. 2021 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I already had these rights in the past, and I'd like to help with the large amount of pending edit requests. You can check my previous activity at User:Est. 2021/contribs#Edit requests. – Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 08:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- I am inclined to decline this; you have been granted the right twice on a temporary basis, and yet have made almost no template-related edits during those periods (and zero template edits during the previous 2024 trial). You have also not made any TPERs since your last trial. What makes this time different from the previous two? Primefac (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Primefac: Well, I didn't easily use these rights unless there were valid pending requests. During my trial, I performed 3 and declined 2 of them. None of them has been contested. Yet I'm not going to eagerly engage in unneeded protected edits just to increase my edit count, I only engage in the ones I'm sure about. If you expect me to abuse TPERs and TE rights, it's not going to happen. I just saw there are currently 19 pending requests and I thought I could be helpful, nothing more. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 12:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Yes we do need more editors who are willing to look at these requests (currently 25 now), and you could help with this. I think Primefac is asking why you requested the right in Feb 2024 but then made no edits to templates in that period. We would normally expect to see more edits so we can make a decision about applying the right permenantly — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: Well, I usually don't talk about my personal life here, and I would like to continue on that path, but I also understand why some context may be helpful for you, despite it being private. Unfortunately, as you know, that period you mentioned was few months right after the beginning of the genocide in Gaza, with war crimes to be documented everyday and countless starving families and kids needing help to survive and escape bombings, so as a human rights activist and project manager for the Human Rights Watch on Palestine, I had to focus on that. Besides it being my life-mission and job, human lives obviously came first. So, going back to the question: Wikipedia is very important to me, but you know, we all real-life have priorities. That's all. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 23:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Yes we do need more editors who are willing to look at these requests (currently 25 now), and you could help with this. I think Primefac is asking why you requested the right in Feb 2024 but then made no edits to templates in that period. We would normally expect to see more edits so we can make a decision about applying the right permenantly — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Primefac: Well, I didn't easily use these rights unless there were valid pending requests. During my trial, I performed 3 and declined 2 of them. None of them has been contested. Yet I'm not going to eagerly engage in unneeded protected edits just to increase my edit count, I only engage in the ones I'm sure about. If you expect me to abuse TPERs and TE rights, it's not going to happen. I just saw there are currently 19 pending requests and I thought I could be helpful, nothing more. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 12:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Footer
Policies and links