User talk:MrOllie

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Question about an edit you reverted 2 days ago

hi. I'm quite new. In fact, this was my first edit. You reverted it. I wanted to learn what was wrong with it, and now I could improve.

It was suggested i post on the page in question's talk, so I did. But I'm told i didn't put enough details into it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Master_and_Margarita

This is a link (I believe) to the talk page. The edit was adding a performance in Under the adaptations section for this book. Can you help me understand, and hopefully improve? Even make sure I post properly? Jimstarkband (talk) 00:23, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

There were no reliable sources. Wikipedia is not supposed to contain an indiscriminate list of every performance or adaptation. The text was also very promotional. MrOllie (talk) 00:32, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

i was under the impression the two reviews from independent sources counted as reliable sources. In the case of these types of adaptations, what is a reliable source? Also, i don't understand what you mean by promotional here? Jimstarkband (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

following up here. Should these questions be directed elsewhere? Jimstarkband (talk) 17:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Red Hair

13% of Scotland does not have red hair this is a misconception that has now been disproven by research. Dr. Jim Wilson conducted the largest study on red hair and found the number of people in Scotland with the hair colour to be only 6% which is backed up by an older study from 1907 which had over half a million participants making it by far the largest study on hair colour in Scottish history and found the number of Scottish redheads to be 5.3% I think it's far more accurate to state 6% of Scotland is red haired as oppose to 13% as that figure is purely just an estimation and has no bases in an actual fact Billybob the third1244 (talk) 15:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Take it to the article talk page. You have been reverted by more than one person and they will not participate in discussion here. MrOllie (talk) 15:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

how do I take it to the article page? Billybob the third1244 (talk) 15:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

in what way am i suppose to take it to the article page? sorry my Wikipedia editing knowledge is not the best I'm genuinely asking Billybob the third1244 (talk) 15:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

See Help:Talk pages. You need to get support from other editors to proceed with your edits by convincing them on the article's associated talk page. Simply repeating the same edits again will not work, and is considered edit warring. Edit warring is prohibited by policy here. MrOllie (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

could I just edit that both Ireland and Scotland have high percentages of red hair without saying one has a greater number than the other Billybob the third1244 (talk) 20:27, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

You must get support from others on the talk page to continue. Not my user talk page. MrOllie (talk) 20:35, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

I'm not a very experienced editor and don't know how to access or use the talk page could you please help me out on this Billybob the third1244 (talk) 01:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

I don't know how to use the talk page I'm not an experienced editor so could you please help me out. thanks Billybob the third1244 (talk) 01:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

No. Using talk pages is required if you want to edit Wikipedia, I cannot do this for you. Please direct any follow up questions to WP:TEAHOUSE, I will not respond here any further. MrOllie (talk) 01:27, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Your recent reverts

Hello, With regard to your recent reverts, I don't want to be rude, may I ask do you have any conflict of interest? Like, are you a surgeon, or someone related to a hospital or medical equipment providers, etc? 183.178.113.38 (talk) 12:55, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Stop with the profringe stuff and false accusations, you aren't fooling anyone. MrOllie (talk) 12:56, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

I do not have any conflict of interest. Why do you follow me to different articles and reverting and adding the undisclosed paid tag? I suggest you assume good faith.

You haven't replied to my question: do you have any COI? 183.178.113.38 (talk) 12:58, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

'Assume good faith' doesn't mean 'ignore vandalism by obvious sock accounts'. MrOllie (talk) 13:16, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Reverting

Why do you keep removing my proven accurate information? Corketta (talk) 11:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

(talk page watcher)@Corketta: It seems that your addition was improperly sourced. Any improperly sourced or unsourced material may be removed at any time. Please read WP:REFB to learn how to properly cite sources. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining! @MrOllie resorted to threats. Corketta (talk) 12:09, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, it wasn’t @MrOllie, it was @scottishfinnishraddish Corketta (talk) 12:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Corketta, warnings by administrators aren't "threats". You probably wouldn't like it if you were blocked without warning, would you? Bishonen | tålk 13:09, 20 April 2025 (UTC).

Regarding an edit you reverted

I recently tried to add a reference to a legal analysis of lease contracts and insurance costs from Elsabbah Law Firm. I believe it provides region-specific insight and adds value to the sentence comparing costs. It's not promotional by anymeans and any external link from Wikipedia is a no follow link so I am not gaining anything I truly felt it would be of value Dr. Elsabbah (talk) 21:37, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

It was a clearly inappropriate link to your own site. Wikipedia is not a venue to place links to your law firm. Don't add anything like that again. MrOllie (talk) 22:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your input. Yes it is a link to my site but the content really adds value please take a minute to read it and i hope that you will like it:

First of all, we would like to emphasize that insurance in lease contracts is very important for protecting your investments, Unlike homeowners' insurance, which covers both the building and its contents, renters' insurance (or insurance tied to lease contracts) typically covers only the tenant’s personal belongings and liability. This makes it significantly less expensive for tenants compared to full homeowners' policies. However, before diving into explaining the meaning of insurance and its importance, we must point out another important point that we would like to highlight for property owners to achieve the maximum benefit from renting their properties and to ensure obtaining high and regular revenues for a long period.

This point is how to select tenants and set guidelines for this matter. For example, owners must choose tenants for their properties who have a positive history and stability in rental relationships. This can only be achieved if these tenants have stable and reasonable income or revenues, successful investments, and a good reputation in the community where they live.

In addition to the above, after selecting the appropriate tenant and at the beginning of the rental relationship, a security deposit must be paid. The meaning of a security deposit in the rental relationship is an amount of money paid by the tenant to the property owner at the beginning of the rental relationship. This amount is determined by agreement between the parties and may be a percentage of the rent (5% or 10%) or, for example, the value of two months' rent.

The importance of this security deposit is that it guarantees the owner, to some extent, coverage of damages incurred due to the tenant's breach of contractual obligations, such as not paying the agreed-upon rent or delaying payment, or not paying electricity, water, gas bills, or taxes, etc., which the tenant did not pay at the end of the rental relationship. Or it covers the tenant's financial obligations resulting from damages or deterioration caused by the tenant to the rented place during the period of use. Finally, it represents pressure on the tenant not to breach their contractual obligations with the owner.

The security deposit must be paid at the beginning of the rental relationship and during the conclusion of the lease contract. It should be documented in the lease contract, distinguishing it from rent installments, and should be proven by a separate receipt distinct from the rental value specified in the contract so that there is no confusion in the future between it and the rental value, and to avoid future disputes between the parties.

It's worth noting here that if the tenant complies with the terms of the contract and does not breach any contractual obligations, and delivers the rented place in the condition it was at the beginning of the lease without any debts or bills, then in this case, the owner must legally return the security deposit to the tenant and may not deduct anything from it. If the owner violates this and seizes the security deposit or any part of it without legal justification, the tenant has the right to resort to the judiciary, requesting that the owner be obligated to return the full security deposit with legal compensation.

i that hope you found it valuable and i am sorry if i wasted your time have a nice day. Dr. Elsabbah (talk) 07:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)