Jump to content

Template:Admin dashboard/rfarfp

Edit links
Permanently protected template
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:PERM

Requests for accountcreator

Account creator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:FlightTime

Per the discussion at Overriding spoof checks. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:27, 31 July 2025 (UTC) - FlightTime (open channel) 00:27, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done for now. That linked discussion seems to indicate that this isn't something that'd get you past the current hurdle you're facing. There's an indication that you'd need override-antispoof on Meta instead of enwiki, so the avenues there would be to request override-antispoof be added to a local group on Meta, or apply for one of the existing groups on Meta which has override-antispoof (admin or bureaucrat). If that discussion ends with consensus that getting account creator on enwiki would help then I'm not fully opposed to it, but my current reading of the consensus is that it wouldn't help. stwalkerster (talk) 01:18, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
No, @Stwalkerster: I do not work meta requests at all, I may have a couple edits years ago at meta, I only work renames here at en. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:31, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
The discussion on metawiki suggests that override spoof has nothing to do with the issue you ran in to. If there is something we missed there, please re-open the discussion and provide more details so we can open a bug track if needed. — xaosflux Talk 13:38, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Yoblyblob

Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Also wanted to mention that if I am unsure of a subject's notability, I will utilize WP:AFC for my own articles occasionally Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 02:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Came here to request this permission for a different user, but since Yoblyblob is referencing their WP:MAY25 NPP work, it is worth noting that among the re-reviews of each patroller's work, 14/17 of their patrol decisions were approved. Of the remainder, two were drafted/redirected as WP:TOOSOON coverage of 2026 state elections and one was drafted for lacking enough coverage to qualify under WP:NEVENT. Considering they were the fifth most active patroller of the drive, this accuracy is good, not great. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 19:20, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

User:PickleG13

I have been on Wikipedia for more than a decade, and I truly feel that it is one of my great passions in life. I have more than 30,000 edits, and I am credited with more than 300 articles that are not Redirects or Disambiguation pages. (I personally take credit for more than 100 of these, which did not originate as Redirect pages.) Although I continue to propose Draft pages to this day when I am not 100% confident myself about notability, I frequently go straight to the mainspace and have made a number of articles that have been significant in some form or field, with my particular focus being on film industry and electoral politics pages.

Recently, I redirected a few thousand Supreme Court of the United States cases to the case volumes in which they were listed. It was a large-scale project for me, but in the end it was decided that redlinks would be better for promoting caseload knowledge, something that I agreed to and I believe will continue to service our Wikipedia community. For this reason, it might appear that I have a large number of deleted pages, but this is almost exclusively due to this particular project; I had an edit deletion rate of less than 2%, and I had not had a page that I created taken down in years, not since I was a far more novice editor. (You can read more about that SCOTUS discussion here.)

I believe that being autopatrolled will continue to allow me to contribute to the Wikipedia community, and that is why I am reaching out to ask for permissions. I am happy to answer any questions or improve any articles that I have created if there is anything noticeable that needs help. Although I have long been looking to increase my permissions and role in the community, I quite frankly have always had impostor syndrome stop me from asking, but a bit of encouragement from Liz made me try. Thank you so much! PickleG13 (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

I'm not inclined to grant autopatrolled so soon after the SCOTUS redirect deletions, but won't object if another admin wants to grant it. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:51, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your honest feedback, voorts. Although I hope that an admin decides to grant it, I have been on Wikipedia for a long time and I will continue to for a long time to come no matter what. Please let me know if you ever need help with anything, whether it's a full-scale project or a simple clean-up. PickleG13 (talk) 21:47, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
FWIW, I don't think the redirect incident should be held against Pickle. It was an honest BOLD move that they weren't thinking of as article creation. If those lists actually had information in them about the cases, the redirects wouldn't have even been a negative. And I have made similar redirects before after determining the case was not Notable and adding holding information to the list. My view (obviously, given my longstanding project of making articles for SCOTUS cases) is that we should prefer to have articles, but Pickle's redirect idea did not come from a bad place. Plus, their responses to criticism about this incident were always good, even when I just left a message complaining about it on their talk page. lethargilistic (talk) 18:41, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Fair enough. I'll grant the right. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:12, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 22:13, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

User:CherryPie94

I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Dr vulpes (expires 00:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
The sourcing provided here does not appear to meet WP:NORG, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Can you provide sources that establish the notability of this organization? voorts (talk/contributions) 22:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Lanceloth345

I have created over 25 new articles that meet notability guidelines and follow Wikipedia standards and guideliness. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s core content policies (NPOV, V, NOR) and believe that being autopatrolled will reduce the workload on new page patrollers, my ittention for contributing to Wikipedia, i have mention to my talk page, also to be noted i am reviewer and patroller at Albanian wiki with all articles, neither deleted, and noone of edits are reverted. Thank you in advance. Lanceloth345 (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Hey Lanceloth345, could you comment on why Petrit Malaj was deleted a few weeks ago, and what you improved when you recreated it? (Courtesy ping for Sphilbrick, who deleted under CSD G12.) Similarlly with Gjesti, which is currently in draftspace. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 13:08, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Page Petrit Malaj was recreated again in neutral way + more sources, becouse first version had some words "sounding" not neutral at all, (my fault) as per draft:Gjesti lacking notability it's under review but explained at talk page of draft page reasons why he is notable ect. (also partecipating other editor in discussion). Lanceloth345 (talk) 13:13, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done User:Lanceloth345. The discussion at the Gjesti draft shows that there is still quite a bit of learning to do around notability. You're still quite a new user, so I'm sure you'll pick up the details of the policy over time! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 14:49, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, i try to do my best in advance. Lanceloth345 (talk) 17:12, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

User:ULPS

Been an active user for a few years, created 25+ articles with the only two deletions being mistakenly created redirects (due to a script error). Multiple GAs and FLs. I understand enwiki notability guidelines thoroughly.ULPS (talk • contribs) 22:51, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Support! Low article creation activity in the trailing year, but I'm somewhat familiar with ULPS's work, and would consider him trustworthy enough for autopatrolled. Spot-checks for copyright concerns and sourcing turn up no issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello @ULPS. Where did you cite the DOB for Pat Flynn (musician). No other problems in your most recent creations I could spot. Unrelated, your signature is too light to meet WP:SIGAPP; could you chose a darker colour to get enough contrast. I note that it looks more bold in Chrome than in Firefox. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:21, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Hey @Femke, I think I forgot to cite it. I used an Instagram post of his, which I think is fine under ABOUTSELF, and went and added it now. Apologies, I usually don't forget things like that. And thanks for the heads up about my sig, I'll change it asap. ULPS (talk • contribs) 22:38, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Onatic

As part of the Women in Red project, I create pages about women by translating, adapting, and improving articles from the Spanish Wikipedia. Onatic (talk) 21:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Rollinginhisgrave

Slightly below the recommended 25 creations before nomination, but this editor has a track record of writing quality content that I don't believe NPP needs to continue reviewing. No issues found spot-checking their recent creations. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:26, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has created roughly 21 articles. — MusikBot talk 21:31, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
 Done Wow, somebody who uses high-quality reliable sources to write about food. Thanks for your work! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:28, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Jolielover

Demonstrates understanding of the notability guidelines on a variety of subjects. The articles are fairly well-written and -formatted; a few are also now GAs. I marked a couple of her newer creations as reviewed and found no major issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:31, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Luxtaythe2nd

I have created more than 25 non redirect articles within the past few weeks and 53 non redirects overall. The two mainspace ones that have been deleted were by my own request, thanks to a slip of the "Publish changes" button. Aside from those, all have been approved by the adminteam. I would greatly be thankful to receive this permission. Luxtaythe2nd (Talk to me...) 17:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

User:TinaLees-Jones

I have created over 650 new articles and hope to continue contributing to Wikipedia and knowledge sharing. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Shahnamk

Hello,

I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created around 30 well-sourced, policy-compliant articles on the English Wikipedia.

In addition to my contributions here, I am an administrator (sysop) on the Persian Wikipedia (fa.wikipedia), where I have been active for many years, focusing on content creation, vandalism control, and community support.

Granting this right would help reduce the workload of new page patrollers, as my article creations usually meet Wikipedia’s quality standards.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Best regards, Shahnamk (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Sweetabena

Hello,

I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I’ve created several articles, many of which are currently live and meet Wikipedia’s guidelines on notability and reliable sourcing.

I’m familiar with the key content policies such as WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV, and consistently apply them when creating or editing articles.

I understand that this permission is intended to reduce the workload of new page reviewers by marking trusted users’ pages as reviewed automatically, and I believe my contributions demonstrate the consistency and policy alignment expected for this role.

I have not received any blocks or serious warnings, and I’m committed to continuing constructive, policy-compliant editing.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Sweetabena (talk) 23:39, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Sweetabena: I’ve gone through some of the articles you’ve created, including Daniel Dung Mahama, Simon Akibange Aworigo, Anabah Thomas Winsum, and Nikyema Billa Alamzy. I noticed that these pages have been tagged for AI-generated content (WP:LLM). Could you please clarify this? Additionally, the article on Bright Owusu has a notability issue. Have you made any efforts to address or fix that? I also noticed that most of your articles are about politicians or MPs, which is generally a relatively easier area for a New Page Patroller. Regards! Baqi:) (talk) 12:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Jannatulbaqi,
Thanks for your response and for reviewing my request.
I've now gone through the articles you mentioned; Daniel Dung Mahama, Simon Akibange Aworigo, Anabah Thomas Winsum, and Nikyema Billa Alamzy and made revisions to ensure they fully reflect a human-authored tone, improve clarity, and adhere to Wikipedia’s content policies. I manually wrote these articles based on reliable sources, and I’ve taken extra care to revise any sections that might have appeared too generic or AI-like in style.
Regarding Bright Owusu, I realized that the subject is better known publicly as “C-Confion,” which is the name used in most reliable sources. I initially created a redirect page under that name, and since C-Confion better reflects WP:COMMONNAME, I’ve submitted a technical move request at WP:RM/TR to move the article accordingly.
While many of my articles are in the political space, I’ve focused on that area because it's typically easier to demonstrate notability. That said, I’m open to expanding into other areas and continuing to improve the range and quality of my contributions.
I appreciate your time and consideration, and I remain committed to constructive, policy-compliant editing. Thank you so much.Sweetabena (talk) 21:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

User:AdobongPogi

As a part of Wikipedia: Tambayan Philippines and the Music Task Force, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created over 25 articles, most of which are currently live and have been built with careful attention to WP:N, WP:V, and reliable sourcing. And also I understand that the autopatrolled right is meant to ease the workload of new page reviewrs by automatically marking new pages from trusted users as reviewed. Thank you! AdobongPogi masarap 🍛 04:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Cognifex

  • Cognifex (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right. I have been an active contributor for over a month, with more than 1,700 edits across diverse topics, particularly in Indian biographies, cinema, history, and culture. I consistently adhere to Wikipedia's content policies, including notability, verifiability, and neutral point of view. Several of my articles have been successfully accepted through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the workload on new page reviewers by allowing trusted users like myself to create articles without requiring manual review. Thank you for your time and consideration.
 Automated comment This user has created roughly 7 articles. — MusikBot talk 10:10, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

User:AlphaBetaGamma

Had my first AP request declined due to my poor judgement with notability of railway stations. I've learned from that mistake (and cleaned up after myself), and I've created articles like Expo 2025 pavilions (Although this was a collaboration with Epicgenius) and Magical Girl Witch Trials since my request was declined. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:06, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Royalesignature

I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for over two years, and I truly feel that it is one of my greatest passions in life. I have made more than 4,000 edits and am credited with creating over 100 articles, excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. Additionally, I have expanded and improved numerous stub articles, enhancing their content and quality. I have also translated several articles into local languages, making Wikipedia more accessible to a broader audience. By becoming autopatrolled, I believe I can not only continue contributing effectively to the Wikipedia community based on my vast knowledge of WP:N, WP:V, and reliable sourcing but also help ease the burden on administrators in assessing quality content. That's why I'm requesting this permission. I'm happy to answer any questions or improve any articles I've created if there's anything noticeable that needs attention. Royalesignature (talk). 11:16, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

User:lethargilistic

Created hundreds of articles, new creations do not appear to require patrolling. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:11, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Oh, I guess this would be nice. Thanks for thinking of me. lethargilistic (talk) 16:31, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
 Done CoconutOctopus talk 10:03, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Hi @CoconutOctopus, Sorry for my unnecessary involvement here. I noticed that you have granted autopatrolled right to Lethargilistic, but I didn't see granted message in their talk page. Would you please review it? Probably this might help you. Fade258 (talk) 13:54, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
No, thanks for the heads up! I've notified them and installed that helpful script. Cheers! CoconutOctopus talk 14:05, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for your swift reply. Sorry again to bothering you. Please do like this using user right manager. It looks good better than previous one. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 14:22, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Umarxon III

Hello. I would like to get an automatic patrol permission. Sincerely, Umarxon III (talk) 21:58, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Dantus21

I would like to do cleanups after requested moves, in particular fixing links to go to the main article instead of a redirect. Dantus21 (talk) 01:20, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

This smells like a violation of point 4 of WP:AWBRULES. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:33, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
I disagree, but feel free to deny my request, or if you want I can retract it. Dantus21 (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
It does seem reasonable to use AWB for this purpose (changing mistargeted wikilinks does not seem fun to do by hand, especially if it comes into the hundreds), albeit it might be a good time to see if there's consensus for this type of usage if there hasn't been any relevant discussions. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:02, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
You may want to have a look at the Move+ script which can automate link retargeting. CoconutOctopus talk 10:05, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for mass message sender

Mass message sender

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:AirshipJungleman29

Just proposed a large WikiProject merge here, and intend to propose more in the future of similar scale. I would rather prefer avoiding the trouble of sending individual notifications (in this case to 55 WikiProject talk pages) and don't want to be a bother constantly spamming the talk page with requests. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:50, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Gjb0zWxOb

I am requesting for this permission to help address the backlog of unreviewed pages and to ensure the quality of new content submitted uses encyclopedic language and that the content is accurate and neutral. I have participated in hundreds of AfDs and during that time I have developed a solid understanding of WP:GNG, RS requirements (WP:SIGCOV), and other relevant policies for reviewing pages. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:23, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions and your interest in this permission. Reviewing your recent contributions, however, I'm concerned that War on Crypto and the attendant page move discussion demonstrates a weak understanding of WP:TITLE. I'm also doubtful of some other editorial decisions, such as having an entire section on "Views on Bitcoin" in Lyn Alden.  Not done signed, Rosguill talk 19:43, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, isn't this decision usually determined by a more objective set of criteria than only the subject matter content of the edits? This seems subjective to me and is based on the topics I am interested in and good faith disagreements between me and other parties made on that matter rather than being made strictly on policy. Given my AfD history, I clearly understand what makes a notable, reliable page and what does not.
Would it be possible for another admin to look at my AfD history among other factors to consider if I am eligible for this perm? Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 12:18, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
I think that War on Crypto is a pretty clear-cut misapplication of WP:TITLE. By contrast, War on crypto would have been defensible in my evaluation, but that's not the title you chose. signed, Rosguill talk 18:04, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
No issue with this improvement. The page move has already been completed to now be titled "War on crypto" Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 16:18, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
I've undone this move, as the ongoing RM should be allowed to unfold and followed. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 16:26, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Please revert it back to War on crypto, I agreed with concerns about the capital “C” in “Crypto.” Then we can still discuss which title is best. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 17:07, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Is there a process to appeal a permission decision to have one additional admin review my application? Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 23:08, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Unfortunately not. I would recommend calibrating to the feedback received, continuing to do good work in NPP-adjacent areas, and re-applying in 3 months if you're still interested. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:20, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Sophisticatedevening

After a break I would like to get back into reviewing, I'm a regular AfC reviewer and have experience with creating new articles (e.g. Parasitic ant, List of insect orders, Agerafenib, etc.) Sophisticatedevening(talk) 17:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 17:20, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
It looks like you requested that the permissions be removed while still undergoing your trial run, so I'm reviewing your past batch of reviews. One review that draws some concern is this revision of Marcus Stokes (football). Sophisticatedevening, could you speak to your review process for this article? signed, Rosguill talk 19:37, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
@Rosguill: Sure, I ran it through earwigs with no red flags, I saw some articles like this this and this on him (the fake sources were concerning at the time but I thought it was unlikely to be deleted with the real ones present and other sources out there I found), prose wasn't egregious so I reviewed it. I personally disagreed with the draftification reason by CycloneYoris saying it was machine generated as I see an awful lot of AI slop at AfC and this didn't raise any of those red flags for me. Looking back I should have given more alarm to the number of fake sources and could have draftified based on that, but this was my review process at the time. Sophisticatedevening(talk) 19:54, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
That seems well-reasoned,  Done. As it turns out, the initial editor was able to repair the broken links after the draftification signed, Rosguill talk 20:01, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Northernhenge

I've been spending quite a bit of time recently at Special:NewPagesFeed sometimes making small improvements where I think it could be useful. I've noticed the enoromous backlog there, so what I'm currently doing in any case, could also help with the backlog if I have the new page reviewer role. There's a discussion near the end of my talk page about me possibly doing this. I'm still a bit cautious about it but willing to give it a go. Northernhenge (talk) 21:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Northernhenge, reviewing your recent article creations, could you comment on your thinking regarding the case for the notability of Jenny Ryan (actress)? Additionally, for Local Nature Recovery Strategy, could you identify which of the cited sources can be considered independent of the subject? signed, Rosguill talk 15:41, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
@Rosguill, I created Jenny Ryan (actress) as a redirect to Woolly and Tig#Cast, to overcome confusion with Jenny Ryan the English quizzer, singer and television personality. Someone recently changed that to an article so I’ve been contributing, hopefully to improve it, but the only independent ref I can find is the Scotsman newspaper interview, so notability is certainly questionable.
For Local Nature Recovery Strategy, the BBC News source is independent. As it's an "official" initiative, most current references are to where the individual schemes are hosted. They're using DEFRA guidelines, so the DEFRA reference is more of a definition than an independent source. As most of them are still at the consultation stage, there isn't much public discussion of them at present. The bigger picture for me is that I've been looking at articles about Site of Special Scientific Interest locations, and – for some now, and for most/all in the future – they will need to mention their local LNRS. I created it after I'd created Skiddaw Group SSSI. I needed to include the LNRS but any amount of detail about the LNRS scheme would end up being repeated across numerous other SSSI articles. Yes, it does need more independent sources, and I’m assuming that more will become available as the scheme continues to roll out. --Northernhenge (talk) 16:25, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the prompt answers, I'm satisfied with the explanations and think that given your AfD track record and long tenure, I can confer the full permissions at this time  Done signed, Rosguill talk 17:40, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Royalesignature

As an experienced Wikipedia editor with over 4,000 edits and more than 2 years of active participation, I've developed a strong foundation in the platform's policies and guidelines. I'm now seeking permission to take on a more significant role in maintaining the quality of Wikipedia's content. To achieve this, I aim to utilize my understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, particularly WP:GNG (General Notability Guideline) and WP:SIGCOV (Significant Coverage), which I've developed through my participation in Articles for Deletion (AfD) discussions. My goal is to review pages and ensure that the content is written in an encyclopedic tone, accurate, neutral, and supported by reliable sources. By granting me permission, I believe I can make a meaningful contribution to maintaining the integrity and quality of Wikipedia's content. Royalesignature (talk). 03:41, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Your article creation statistics appear promising, and you may be granted the right on a trial basis. However, your request reads as somewhat ambiguous. I also observed that your AfD participation is quite limited, and there are no CSD or PROD entries in your logs, this might be due to not using Twinkle, which typically helps track such activities. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 09:31, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Many thanks for your acknowledgement of my article creation statistics. Regarding the ambiguity, kindly let me know which part needs clarification, please. Royalesignature (talk). 10:04, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions and your interest in this permission. In reviewing your recent articles and AfD participation, I don't think you're quite ready yet for a trial run. Ikirun College of Health Technology has some obvious WP:MOS issues; while in a certain sense they're trivial, it's concerning that you did not notice them before applying here. Meanwhile, as Chippla alludes to, you make a big deal about AfD discussions and how you've developed your understanding of guidelines there, but reviewing the track record of your participation at AfD doesn't demonstrate this: you've participated in 3 discussions, only one of them this year, and in all of them you made a delete !vote piling on after multiple other editors had already laid out the case for deletion. There's not necessarily anything wrong with these !votes, but they don't demonstrate that you have a strong understanding of the relevant guidelines yourself, and it seems odd to assert that you've developed your understanding through these discussions when you've participated in so few and there's no real evidence of learning or improvement in or across these discussions.  Not done signed, Rosguill talk 15:57, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Junbeesh

Hi again, My NPP flag lapsed last month, and I'd like to request an extension. During the trial I patrolled dozens of new pages, tagging some for CSD and sending others to AfD when sourcing or notability was thin. My CSD and AfD logs should show I understand the relevant policies. I haven't edited as much since the flag dropped, but I'm keen to dive back in and help clear the queue. A renewal would let me start right away. Junbeesh (talk) 09:33, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Track record looks good,  Done signed, Rosguill talk 16:00, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Opm581

My trial NPP right expires on August 8, and I would like for it to be extended or made permanent. Thanks. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 00:45, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 8 August 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 00:50, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Kowal2701

Mainly requesting so I can bold move pages to multi-revision redirects, but I may cautiously move into closing RMs one day. I think I have decent experience from participating at WP:RMC and understand the guidelines reasonably well. Thanks, Kowal2701 (talk) 10:58, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Some recent examples where I had to start an RM where I would have bold moved are Talk:Caliphate of Hamdullahi#Requested move 15 July 2025 and Talk:Amina, Queen of Zazzau#Requested move 24 July 2025 (ongoing) Kowal2701 (talk) 11:09, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Technically, if you would normally have bold moved a page (uncontroversial, do not expect opposition) but couldn't for technical reasons, WP:RM/TR would be the better way to do it since it avoids the 7 day listing period of a full RM. This is not a comment on the actual merits of granting or not granting though, which I'll leave to the patrolling admins. Alpha3031 (t • c) 19:02, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
If people don’t think I need the tool or that the benefit doesn’t outweigh the potential costs just say and I’ll retract this Kowal2701 (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Please be patient, you only asked a few days ago and perm requests are rarely handled same-day. Primefac (talk) 23:12, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Mb, I just saw one answered below and assumed it wasn’t a no-brainer Kowal2701 (talk) 08:31, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Cactusisme

Hi, I recently began helping in clearing out requested moves at RMC. Usually, most of the requests would require me request at the technical request section as page already exist at moves desired location. With this right, I would be able to avoid this and move the pages directly. I have read the page mover page as well. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:13, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Julietdeltalima

I attempt whenever possible to correct article titles to sentence case when necessary, but am frequently unable to do so because of the existence of a single-edit redirect. I've been advised at "Requested moves" just to ask for the pagemover right already after 75,000 edits in nearly 11 years.

A perfect current example: Sweet and Sour Pork, which I can't move to Sweet and sour pork without requesting the move and making someone else do my work for me.

Thanks for your consideration! Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:52, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Saltymagnolia

I am a (relatively) long time contributor to Wikipedia, primarily active in content creation. However, following a recent and rather vexing experience involving a user introducing potentially harmful changes to articles en masse without any sort of satisfactory communication with other editors, I have decided I want to become active in dealing with vandalism as well. ✠ Saltymagnolia ✠ 15:36, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

@Saltymagnolia, pending changes reviewer is for approving edits on articles with pending changes protection -- it does not affect your ability to revert vandalism. I'm happy to grant the permission, but I just want to double check you're clear on what this will let you do? Thanks, Giraffer (talk) 20:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
@Giraffer as I understand, it applies to pages with a certain level of protection, where edits by newer or anonymous users require manual approval, e.g. on the article for Margaret Sanger. Thanks. ✦ Saltymagnolia ✦ 20:46, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Cool.  Done Giraffer (talk) 21:10, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

User:JuniperChill

I have been editing for over a year and one of the pages that I recently requested protection is now at PC protection. I also have some experience with reverting vandalism, some via Special:RecentChanges. JuniperChill (talk) 20:38, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Yelps

Hello, I'd like to get rollback rights to fight vandalism more effectively. While I don't patrol recent pages often, I do patrol new pages and short pages, where I frequently undo obvious vandalism (as seen in [3]). I'd like rollback to more easily undo edits, as well as access huggle and other tools. Yelps ᘛ⁠⁐̤⁠ᕐ⁠ᐷ critique me 08:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Camilasdandelions

Hello, I want to receive a rollback right because there are a lot of editors who add informations but not citing sources. Usually, they do not add unsourced informations at once, but they add them by multiple times. There are also edits violating MoS or Wikipedia policies. And I have struggled with reverting all of them one by one, so I decided to request a right for rollback. Thank you. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 03:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 04:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Oops, my notification didn't notice that reply. I'm sorry for it. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 09:55, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Panda Arun

Hello, I am requesting Rollback rights to help stop vandalism. I have made more than 2000 edits on Wikipedia since 2021. I understand how rollback works and will use it only when needed.

Thank you Panda 🐼 Arun (Talk) 07:10, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

User:OceanLoop

I am a budding copyeditor with a growing number of watched pages to police for vandalism. Unfortunately, some vandals use multiple revisions, making it tedious and time-consuming to fix without a rollback permission. Thank you for your considerations. OceanLoop (talk) 13:19, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Kiwipete

I would like to make a comparatively minor change to Template:TERYT as requested by Altenmann on the template's talk page. However, even though I created this template, it has had its protection level set. Kiwipete (talk) 04:04, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

It looks like that has gone unprocessed primarily because it was dequeued from having an active edit request. If this is one-off issue, I think the best solution would be to just put {{edit protected|answered=no}} back on the page, and a patrolling template editor should process it. (the backlog at Category:Wikipedia template-protected edit requests isn't usually very long). — xaosflux Talk 13:19, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done per the above (noting the TPER has been fulfilled). If this template needs future editing by you, Kiwipete, I believe it would be reasonable to simply drop its protection. Primefac (talk) 01:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Darth Stabro

Howdy. I'm an active participant over at WP:DYK, and recently ran in WP:AELECT but did not pass the threshold. Discussion centered around lack of experience on WP:AIV, an area I expressed interest in getting involved in. A decent part of my running for adminship was wanting to help with processing WP:DYK queues, which are template-protected. In my election discussion there were no concerns raised about my professionalism, content creation or reviewing competency, which are the primary things needed with processing DYK queues. I do not meet some of the standard template editor guidelines (e.g. sandbox/significant template edits, etc), but I also do not plan on using the role outside of DYK queue processing. Thanks for your consideration. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 16:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Are there any active DYKers that you are working with often that could leave support here? — xaosflux Talk 19:14, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

References

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Admin_dashboard/rfarfp&oldid=1267255559"