Hello, Voicebox64, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Michael B. Jordan. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
I understand the confusion, but Comicbookmovie isn't reliable source because it isn't technically a legit news site with reporters. You see, it works similar to Wikipedia in the sense that anyone can create an account and post articles to the site. DarkKnight214916:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Marvel Comics characters: S, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iron Fist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Your addition to Regular Show (season 8) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir(talk)16:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't add rowspan to tables. It causes problems for screenreaders used by visually impaired people. Tables are just as informative and readable without rowspan. See MOS:DTT and WP:ADAD. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 16:38, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for linking minor MCU characters to their comic counterparts. However, it is more beneficial to avoid linking to an article section (ie List of Marvel Comics characters: M#Brett Mahoney) and to a redirect article instead (ie Brett Mahoney), in the event a user decides to create a full fledged article for them. If you are going through doing this, it would be helpful to create the redirects, as they most likely won't exist yet. If you don't know how to do that, I'd be happy to explain, since if you plan to continue doing this, you can do it all in one act. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Voicebox64. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kristen Stewart. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Argento Surfer (talk) is wishing you a MerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Marvel Comics characters: A, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inhuman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Encounter (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dragonball Evolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Son Goku. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Henry Zaga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969TT me04:48, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thanks for working to improve the site with this edit to Jona Xiao. However, this edit, unlike the others to made to the article, had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.
Also, remarks that indicate an editor's opinion, like the word "unfortunately", should not be included in articles, as content must be written in a neutral, formal tone.
If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks~ Nightscream (talk) 23:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In your edit on the Song of the South article, you added a quote which was not about the film, but about another series for which Oprah Winfrey had done an introductory video. Please be cautious when adding things to make sure something isn't being taken out of context or applied to the wrong things (which is what happened here). Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
When you find a character article that has been redirected, you should consider looking at the older revisions and restoring the article instead of rewriting it from scratch. Case in point, Corvus Glaive previously[2] had some good info that would have otherwise been lost, so I added that into your version of the article. 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 15:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I was looking over this article, and I noticed you cited A History of Underground Comics. Is this a book you've actually read, or did you find the google books version in a search? My local comic shop has a copy I've been eyeing for a while, and I'm hoping you can recommend it (or not). Argento Surfer (talk) 13:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Voicebox64, thank you so much for contributing to Wikipedia! I am actually producing a podcast episode about unsung heroes, such as the people who go out of their way to contribute to the benefit of thousands of strangers. I'd love to include a short phone call with you where I'd just say thanks "in person." Let me know if that's something you'd be willing to let me do! Thanks!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aballstaedt (talk • contribs) 23:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! North America100003:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Marvel Comics characters: K, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inhuman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Someone at Marvel One-Shots thought we shouldn't eliminate a ridiculous logical redundancy there, so I started a discussion on the talk page to dispute this ridiculous idea. Will you please come and support the correction of this error? Thanks, if you do. Be Your Own Hero (talk) 02:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed you've done some constructive editing recently.
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. User:Insertcleverphrasehere (talk) 07:07, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Voicebox64. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Voicebox64: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 03:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Reynolds until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk08:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Markdask. Voicebox64, thanks for creating Noah Burstein!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please format existing references as external links
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hi. You are doing a good job adding some pages for the characters in Marvel Comics. As H-Alpha, who was created by the Weapon X Project, is going to be having his comic series coming out later this month, I was wondering if you would like to help in the creation of his page by the time of the comic series' release. As for Voyager, we'll need to keep an eye on her appearances just in case she survives the "No Surrender" arc that is occurring weekly. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Is Frederick Frederickson III the name of Fred's father? I already know that his superhero name is Boss Awesome, but is there a source that proves Frederick Frederickson III is his name? Is there someone else who can tell me? Please respond as soon as you can.--81.99.20.66 (talk) 16:00, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Hayter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In order to prevent further edit warring on an issue that shouldn't be warred over, I restored the red carpet image on Emily Carmichael (filmmaker). Please respect this change. I took the WonderCon photo, and would prefer the red carpet one be used instead as well. Calibrador (talk) 01:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Kudpung. Voicebox64, thanks for creating Lilan Bowden!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This is a WP:PBLP - please add more sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Hi, I'm Kudpung. Voicebox64, thanks for creating Joe Pera!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. To avoid deletion please address the tagged issues
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Hello, Voicebox64. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Joe Pera, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Linda Louise Duan, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 02:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Louise Duan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 18:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hakim Callender until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 23:57, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I was trying to evaluate a Special:RecentChanges edit, where someone changed a name a bit, and then they added a bit more information. Thing is, I can't find anywhere on the site about this. Do you know if these changes are accurate.
Hello, Voicebox64. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koyu Rankin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you:-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sunita Deshpande (actress) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunita Deshpande (actress) .
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you:-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Clarissa Thibeaux, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melia Kreiling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 08:20, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rtkat3 (talk) is wishing you a Happy Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!
Share this message by adding {{subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noëlle Renée Bercy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winston James Francis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk13:39, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Brooklyn McLinn) has been reviewed!
The subject is a borderline case for WP:NACTOR, as he's had a lot of parts but most of them appear to be rather minor. The sourcing currently provided in the article, however, is considerably short of WP:GNG.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hello, I'm Alex 21. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, List of Rapunzel's Tangled Adventure episodes, concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date= parameter in the citation template. The |access-date= parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- /Alex/2107:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
List of Big Hero 6: The Series episodes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kid Kaiju until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 17:45, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of IMDb. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I noticed you always add a longer plot to Wikipedia. Are you editing on FANDOM because I could use these on the wiki instead like Central Park Wiki, Solar Opposites, Duncanville, Bless the Harts, etc? Orange Mo (talk) 04:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's okay. I try to get them as simple as possible by following a rule (e.g. keep within five or six lines), but then sometimes I get lazy and expect others to shorten it for me. I actually write longer plots on FANDOM. If you want to use what I have written, go ahead. People seem to do that already.Voicebox64 (talk) 04:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Not to sound rude or anything, but you easily do it yourself. I went ahead and added a source at the top from The Futon Critic. That usually seems to be the go to. Voicebox64 (talk) 05:12, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did re-add the source you deleted. I was just confused why you had deleted that first source. Moot now I guess. Thank you for adding the source in the header. EvergreenFir(talk)19:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Are you ever going to add plot summaries to Bless the Harts? The summaries for that show on Wikipedia page are very underdeveloped. I have full stories on Wikia but do not want to copy paste or reword it again. Orange Mo (talk) 03:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraken (Marvel Comics) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Tobias Jelinek, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:01, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sedale Threatt Jr. (actor) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969TT me14:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Owl House characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eldritch.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deric McCabe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hello. You added unsourced info to the Flora and Ulysses page multiple times. Please always include a source. Also it added duplicate information by mentioning actors who were already listed. The additional information did not add any cast members not already listed. Because of this, if relevant, it does not belong in the cast section. It would be added to the production section. However, even if you addressed all of the following issues it still appears to be trivia which may be ok but is generally avoided from being added on Wikipedia. You may already be familiar with this but here it is just in case-Wikipedia:Handling trivia. And again, ALWAYS make sure to source your additions. Here is the policy on that-Wikipedia:Verifiability. Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 16:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Voicebox64. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tobias Jelinek, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
I recently notice some user has splitting the episode list into its own article, but the list has yet to get a lot of clean-up. Therefore, I want you to clean-up the episode list to make it into the quality standards of Wikipedia, since your a good summary maker.
Make sure that each episode summary is about 100 to 200 words in length, per MOS:TVPLOT. Rewrite or edit summaries to make them the appropriate length.
Make sure to make a guest star section below each episode summary, like in the List of Big City Greens episodes article. We are not have guest stars in the middle of any episode list.
@BaldiBasicsFan Do you want me to try and summarize the whole episode plot in a shortened fashion, or do you want just a basic summary of what each episode is about? Because I think I can do either or.Voicebox64 (talk) 05:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for cleaning-up the episode summaries on the first two half-hour episodes of Amphibia. Keep up the good work. When ever someone does some edit that could be vandalism or disruptive (like putting the names back in the middle of the summaries or removing the guest section), please revert the edit immediately. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 06:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adventure Time: Distant Lands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Lynch.
Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with your edit to Miles Morals. Since you've accumulated over 22,000 edits since 2016, I assume you know by now that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On Chip 'n' Dale: Park Life. — Diannaa (talk) 01:59, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empire State University until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoson An until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Voicebox64. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rafael Silva (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hi, Voicebox64! Don't think I've run into you since a few years ago when I (under a previous username) gave you that barnstar you now have on your userpage. Glad to see you're still editing!
I did want to share a concern, though. In this edit you asserted that a living person had been engaged in multiple incidents of offensive or even criminal behavior. You sourced that to Page Six, which is generally considered unreliable (see WP:PAGESIX). This is a problem both under the policy on biographies of living persons, and is also problematic because it asserts something in the encyclopedia's voice that sources aren't in agreement on (see WP:INTEXT).
As it says at MOS:TVPLOT, episode summaries should be less than 200 words. The version I've written is only 197 words, while the version you keep reverting to is 234. At the rate you're revertingg, you're also on the verge of violating WP:3RR. Please stop the constant reverts to that episode description so we can keep it within Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks much. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 05:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah-Nicole Robles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
I have recently created my first draft and I need some help with it. It needs more sources and has to be bigger. There also needs to be some episodes summaries as well in the 100 to 200 words range per MOS:TVPLOT when the show gets released in English somewhere online. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 14:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
While were waiting for the yellow yeti’s english arrival, I want you to do some help on the Ghostforce article, write in episode summaries, credits and inserting production codes from The Futon Critic. Also the show needs to be in the French broadcast order. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 05:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please fix the plot summaries for episodes 1 and 2a? Also can your write episode summaries and add in credits for the rest? The anime is about to have its 2022 reboot this October, which is why I want you to do some updates on the list. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 03:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Room (AJR album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Because the episodes are 44 minutes long instead of 22, can you still make summaries in the MOS:TVPLOT range? Make sure they are still about 100-200 words in length, but not more than that. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 01:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I lost track on the French broadcast order because I wasn't paying attention to what’s on Télé-Loisirs. Can you please search up possible airtimes on when episodes aired between June 13th and today? If you see the "Inédit" word below the French title of the show, that means its the original airdate of the respective episode. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 04:34, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The current episode summaries for the article are too short and don't have much detail. I tried removing them for not being on the MOS:TVPLOT range but they didn't care. Can you please rewrite the summaries to be in the 100 to 200 word range? BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 03:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Heck (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969TT me11:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Heck YouTube thumbnail.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, Voicebox64. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Heck (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Demon Bear into List of Marvel Comics characters: D. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Nice work on He's Expecting', the page looks good but it needs more independent sources like reviews. It's fine if they're in Japanese or English, whichever you can find. Thanks for contributing!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BuySomeApples}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article are primary and database, BEFORE found name listings, nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, Voicebox64. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Heck".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
No one has seem to write episode summaries for that show, and some user by the name of Tony split the episode list into its own article despite not having summaries yet. I reverted it back to what it is though, but if such split is warranted, can you write episode summaries that tell the entire plot of each episode? That should be more of a reason to split the article in my opinion. Make sure plot summaries are in the 100 to 200 word range like usual. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 04:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Frequently such minor errors reveal a bigger problem. In this case the budget range had been vandalized (diff) and the best way to fix the error was to revert the most recent changes. (Template:Infobox film warns not to cherry pick budget figures, so if multiple sources exist we usually have to include a range.)
Most good editors will try again if they've made a mistake, vandals too unfortunately will frequently try again. Next time you see an error, maybe take an extra bit of time to check the article History and see what change caused the breakage and if maybe it would be better if that change was reverted. Thanks. -- 109.78.198.183 (talk) 22:19, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of Spider-Man media until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.