User talk:InfiniteNexus

This is InfiniteNexus's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30: 14 days

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If I have been active and have not yet responded, please place {{Talkback|your username}} on my page as I may have missed your response.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

CoStar Group subsidiaries

Hi InfiniteNexus, I've suggested further updates in an effort to keep the CoStar Group page relevant. As you have worked to improve the article, I'd appreciate you looking this over. Thank you very much for your time. Hbensur (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this has been

Already done. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:44, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Social media influencer

It has come to my attention based on discussion at Talk:Social_media_influencer#Article_name, that consensus was not properly formed for the page name. In order to follow procedure with a WP:RM, the page needs to sit at its original location prior to the conflict. Can you move the page back so that I can properly open a WP:RM.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyTheTiger: Thanks for the message; I've been away for a few days. I'll respond in detail over there, but if there is no opposition, then consensus is implied; I don't see any new opposition on the talk page, so I'm not sure why some are claiming consensus does not exist. InfiniteNexus (talk) 08:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Generative AI editnotice for Talk:DeepSeek

Hey InfiniteNexus, could you add Template:Generative AI editnotice to Talk:DeepSeek? See this discussion with examples of confused IPs trying to use the chatbot by editing the talk page. Thanks! Jamedeus (talk) 07:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamedeus:

Done. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:45, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Primary genre or consistency?

(diff) I usually agree with trying to keep the WP:FILMGENRE to the primary genre, but I'm not so sure that change is a good idea. You have made Bumblebee_(film) inconsistent with Transformers (film) and the other films in the series. (Also you left a Science fiction oddly capitalized mid sentence.) I would suggest reverting the change or attempting to make it consistent across the entire Transformers film series. -- 109.78.196.107 (talk) 05:55, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed – Updated all seven films, plus Transformers One. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:44, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Valddlac seems to think including secondary genres is preferable to sticking to the primary genre only. I have reverted the ones that I can, but there are two remaining you might want to revert: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transformers:_The_Last_Knight&diff=prev&oldid=1281145466 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transformers:_Age_of_Extinction&diff=prev&oldid=1281145393 -- 109.79.161.105 (talk) 02:08, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand trying to keep everything as simplified as possible, but I’m not seeing an issue with saying sci-fi action. Not only has it been the status quo for some time, but it’s arguably more accurate than saying just science fiction. That's not counting almost all of the reception tabs for these movies referring to it as an action film, or at the very least commenting on the franchise's many action setpieces. I am sorry for not looking into this before I made about this, but your first sentence regarding me sounds like I'm (for a lack of better word) primitive. From the past conversations I've had with you before, and how I've seen you interact with others before, you have a very condescending approach when it comes to handling users who don't see the same exact outlook as you. Valddlac (talk) 11:15, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please both of you two read this before making any further decision regarding editing. Not only can I back myself up regarding genres, but this has been an issue that I've had with the latter user for some time and I would like for this to be addressed. Valddlac (talk) 11:35, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:48, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film has an RfC

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. —Matthew / (talk) 22:49, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"AI Overviews" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect AI Overviews has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 18 § AI Overviews until a consensus is reached. Justjourney (talk) 02:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]