User talk:Nihonjoe

日本穣—Nihonjoe—Talk page

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74

Ref. Lib. Archives: 1

Generally, I'll reply here if you post here, so please watch this page if you want to see my reply. If replying on another page, use the {{ping}} or {{reply}} templates to make sure I notice your reply. If I don't reply within a couple days on another page where you replied to one of my comments, feel free to drop a message here. Thanks! ···日本穣

Leave me a new message

Richmal

Her best-known protagonist was male, but she wasn't. Really.

Incidentally, if you're wondering how I dared create such an under-referenced, opinionated article -- I didn't. So far I've done little more than tone it down from the state it was in before I first encountered it. Of course it remains pretty terrible. I hope I'll be able to improve it to some extent, but "RL" is making certain demands on me, demands that may hinder this enterprise. -- Hoary (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, The writing was rather confusing and it was hard to tell which pronoun was referring to which person. John Battersby Crompton Lamburn was definitely male, though. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 01:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. (I've made bigger goofs in my time.) Lucky that I didn't glance at the article's history, notice that you'd arrived before I ever did, and accuse you of perpetrating this under-referenced, opinionated article. (Which of course you didn't, as will be obvious to anyone who does more than glance.) Though actually I derive a certain pleasure from reading articles that show an Olympian disregard for the norms of Wikipedia, at least when these articles are literate and amicable. This was an example, and I've felt a certain amount of regret while stripping it of some of its excrescences. -- Hoary (talk) 06:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]