This username matched "Used x instead of cks attempting to skip filter: dreck. Violating string: drecksthemoth" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Note on file German for "filth" -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 23:20, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 02:00, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Tmfaustin (talk·contribs·deleted·filter log·SUL·Google)• (block · soft·promo · cause ·bot·hard·spam·vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. I've nominated both of these user's articles for AfD due to notability concerns, however I wanted to also report this user to WP:UAA. Although the user has made these edits a long time ago (during the time period of 2014-2019), the user has only edited Wikipedia about themselves/their non-profit organization titled The Miracle Foundation (which suits their username, Tmfaustin). Their user page also further proves this. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. WormEater13, we don't bother to block accounts that have not edited since 2019. Cullen328 (talk) 00:15, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC)Tbhotch™ 05:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 02:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The socks of Vagrdyuy9 are spamming it again, which had led to the article's protection earlier. HistoryofIran (talk) 09:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 02:06, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP sockpuppetry – High IP vandalism changing any information not shown in the sources. Please protect page. 2001:448A:1020:5990:3109:CDEB:A1E0:6D5C (talk) 13:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The page has seen an increased level of vandalism and likely sockpuppet edits following Coachella and American media coverage. It would be best for the page moving forward to be locked for some time until the interest falls back off. Ruralexpat (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — rsjaffe🗣️ 21:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruptive editing and edit warring. POV statements in lead about Alawite involvement with Assad regime. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 17:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months by User:Ad Orientem, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. - Aoidh (talk) 02:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism Replayerr (talk) 21:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. May consider WP:ANI. — rsjaffe🗣️ 21:50, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection as the article is newly created and already experiencing disruptive and unsourced edits related to a recent incident. Thanks. Aliyiya5903 (talk) 22:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
I'd probably go for ECP given that the article is covered by the scope of WP:CT/IPA. Aydoh8[contribs] 04:29, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Also the page is already semi-protected but the DE is still continuing. Aydoh8[contribs] 04:33, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
I would agree with that. I'm not certain whether it would be filtered or logged as disallowed, but it appears similar to the content found on User talk:IanDBeacon/Sandbox X. It seems to be a case of attempting to misuse it, as the message appears to be copied and pasted or contains inappropriate material. ~Junior5a(Talk)Cont 01:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I am aware that talk pages are rarely protected, but I think it is justified in this case. There has been a string of users coming along to propose the same change of pronouns on this page over and over, and occasionally sprinkling in transphobic rhetoric as well. GraziePrego (talk) 03:42, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users consistently adding information with only primary sources, not making any attempts to find reliable third-party sources to prove notability. –WPA (talk) 03:56, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Article was protected since 2008. The article doesn't have that much page views, unlike Satan. We can try to unprotect this one. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 21:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected. Average of 1,100 views per day in 2025, in comparison to Susan Wojcicki's 2,000 (the last article I unprotected with a similar view count, which has been successful). This article has 762 watchers, so any vandalism should be removed quite swiftly, though I'll review a few months down the line. May need pending changes in the future. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment:@Sdrqaz: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
✔️ Already done only move protection will be remain in place due to move page vandalism❗️ 47.21.195.98 (talk) 04:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving...47.21.195.98 (talk) 04:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I would like to request rollback permissions to help combat vandalism more effectively on Wikipedia, I have been reverting vandalism for a good amount of time from recent changes using twinkle and undo. Therefore I think rollback tool can help me to assist in identifying and reverting unconstructive edits efficiently. Imwin567 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to get a rollback. I often search for vandalism on Wikipedia, and it will obviously be easier for me to fight it with a rollback. I warn users when necessary, and i know the most important WP policies. The Seal F1 (talk) 07:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
As a patroller and changes reviewer, I often find subtle vandalisms I can't easily fix in a click. I'd like to be more effective against disruptive edits. You can check my history at User:Est. 2021/contribs#Maintenance.— Est. 2021 (talk·contribs) 09:01, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Hey Est. 2021, that's a pretty impressive page. May become tough to maintain if the number of edit requests increases, of course. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:10, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Disagree The granting of new user rights has been questioned. Permission granted too hastily, in 9 hours from creation request by this user. Not only the contribution number of edits is important but also the behavior. The user violated the rules on the day the permissions were granted. The matter is explained here: User_talk:Est._2021#+rollback. Since when does Wikipedia treat disposable posting a valid link to an article as "unconstructive" and "disruptive" edits? Please read his application above, I quote, "I often find subtle vandalisms I can't easily fix in a click. I'd like to be more effective against disruptive edits". This is his "to be more effective against disruptive edits"? User named the correct edit as "disruptive" and just got tools to remove such edits more easily. @ToBeFree:: this is unacceptable. Permissions granted too hastily should be revoked. TravelerFromEuropeanUnion (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
TravelerFromEuropeanUnion, oh, here too. Same advice here: Talk to the user if you're unhappy about their conduct. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to assist with reverting vandalism. I’m familiar with relevant guidelines and will use the tool appropriately. Thank you for your consideration. 👑 JesusisGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 17:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
@Pppery I'm really sorry for applying all the request at once as I thought I have fufilled all the criterias, I would only like to apply for Rollback rights in order to gain a new experience so to prevent vandalism and disruptive edits, Thanks! 👑 JesusisGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 08:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
I wish to have Rollback permissions to revert vandalism as I've been doing for at least a month with 500+ main space edits I wish to use like WP:HUGGLE and a lot more programs to help prevent vandalism. Valorrr(lets chat) 22:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBottalk 22:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
I know this, and I believe I improved. Valorrr(lets chat) 22:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Question: Valorrr: I'd still like to see you get some more experience before granting you the rollback permission as it will allow you access to some fairly powerful automated tools, as you have indicated. I can see that you have gained some experience though. To show that you understand when you can use permissions to help in a related area that usually has a backlog I'd be happy to grant you the pending changes reviewer permission so that you can help review Special:PendingChanges. Would you be okay with that? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:15, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
I'm perfectly okay with that, do you want me to notify you when I come back for rollback? Valorrr(lets chat) 16:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I've been patrolling, creating, and monitoring articles on Wikipedia for months, but recently i've been able to be more active. I would like to request the rollback right - having the right would make my work patrolling Special:RecentChanges easier, as I wouldn't need to manually undo edits, but rather just be able to rollback edits directly. I use tools such as WP:RedWarn and WP:Twinkle, so having rollback rights would help me combat vandalism easier. Not to mention, I am aware of Wikipedia's core policies - such as WP:N, WP:NPOV, etc. As a newcomer myself, I am very well aware of WP:BITE and try to be as friendly and welcoming to new editors as possible. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 192 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBottalk 00:40, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. I've just granted you the Pending Changes Reviewer permission from your request there. Let's see how you get on with that first and then we'll take another look again when you've made a few more edits. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Callanecc! I apologize if disturbing, but would I be able to ask for a re-review? Since you replied, i've made about ~300 more edits (60%), and have been able to review quite a few articles with PCR. I would love to utilize the rollback feature, especially since a lot of my contributions as of right now are towards combatting vandalism. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
I just want to inform that I mistakenly added all requests at once I am sorry I just want to apply for rollback rights so to prevent vandalism and disruptive edits, this will help me to gain a new experience so I can contribute my best.... Thanks! 👑 JesusisGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 15:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
I feel like rollback rights will help me fight vandalism more effectively here on the English Wikipedia. I generally meet the guidelines on the top of this page (I've patrolled actively for the better part of a month now) and I believe it would help me more efficiently fight back against vandalism than being limited to Undo and base Twinkle. I try my best to correctly warn editors as well. Nahidahaii 17:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 175 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBottalk 00:50, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
I've been dabbling with antivandalism for a bit now. I think using rollback would be helpful for this. I already have it on another project (Commons) so I understand its usefulness. Thank you for your consideration. CutlassCiera 19:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Requests for permission - account creator
There are no outstanding requests for account creator.
