User talk:Significa liberdade

Significa liberdade is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Significa liberdade}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

This is Significa liberdade's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: 30 days

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Significa liberdade! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:55, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Patricia Wright wiki page

Hi Significa Liberdade, Thanks so much for your feedback on the drafted article. I updated it with additional citations showing credibility—media interviews, publications. I'd appreciate your feedback. Have a great new year!

Denver Outlaws

Hello @Significa liberdade

@AFC Vixen I’m reaching out to raise a concern about a user who appears to be dominating the editing process and talk page discussions related to the Denver Outlaws and the Denver Outlaws (2006–2020) pages. This user has consistently rejected the merger proposal without engaging in constructive dialogue or attempting to reach consensus, despite multiple editors supporting the merger—around six users across both pages.

There are examples of this behavior on both talk pages, where the user has been dismissive and, at times, has used language that feels like bullying toward those in favor of the merger. It’s creating a hostile environment and undermining collaborative editing.

I respectfully request that action be taken to either protect the page or have an administrator intervene to facilitate a proper consensus discussion. This behavior is counterproductive to Wikipedia’s collaborative spirit and needs to be addressed so the community can move forward respectfully.@emoore2914

Emoore2914 (talk) 05:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i also put Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion in feb on her Emoore2914 (talk) 05:15, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Emoore2914! I see you posted on the NPOV Noticeboard while the Denver Outlaws merge discussion was open, so it was quickly closed without any discussion. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:36, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! It looks like there has been quite a bit of conversation regarding this issue. Unfortunately, it's late at night for me, so I don't have the energy to read into this issue deeply right now. I might be able to give it more attention sometime in the next 24-48 hours. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:37, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sound good thanks you for the reply! Emoore2914 (talk) 05:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Emoore2914! Unfortunately, my life outside Wikipedia has been busier recently, so I haven't gone through the conversation. Has the issue been resolved at all? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:13, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Significa liberdade, Unfortunate the issues have not be resolved at all. Emoore2914 (talk) 16:33, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution to an AFD

Hey there, Id want you to contribute to the afd, if you don't mind and got some time. [1]. Thanks, have a great day. CaptShayan (talk) 04:56, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, CaptShayan! In case you're not aware, I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia discourages canvassing, that is, notifying people about discussions "with the intention of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way". However, "it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it be done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus". Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Solapur Municipal Transport

Review and accept the submission Venugo (talk) 05:45, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2025

Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336

Online events:

New: Alphabet run G & H | Business
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements (Events facilitated by others):

The European Destubathon – a stub improvement contest/editathon from 1–30 April 2025

Tip of the month:

When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT.
Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited,
it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name.

Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool)

24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women)
27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women)

Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period!

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Speedy Deletion of East Mojo

Hey just wanted to bring it out, since the article was created as part of Wikiproject Newspapers. The Topic is definitely notable, and in no way was it a copyright infringement of EastMjojo.com. Of course, it might have sounded similar because the article was about "East Mojo" the Newspaper. Why was the article deleted so quickly without an Articles for Deletion (AfD) discussion, especially since none of its content infringed copyright and I had written everything in my own words? Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 03:21, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Flyingphoenixchips: Most of the article was copy-pasted from another source. Because Wikipedia must uphold copyright, articles that are copyright violations are not subject to AFD. If you intend on recreating an article for East Mojo, I recommend practicing your paraphrasing. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What source was it taken from? All of it were written by me, and it was definitely not a copy-paste. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 03:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Content was copied from East Mojo's webiste. Although you may have added an infobox and citations, the text was identical to sections of the website. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Full court press

I don't think the capitalization matters here. If I, or another user, typed in full court press, Full Court Press, or Full court press, it is obviously ambiguous in any case. The F C and P being capital can refer to one of two things currently with an article, but that dab page should still list the basketball tactic. The full court press or Full court press can still refer to the album or TV series, just typed out by a user in a different way. Why shouldn't the (disambiguation) be dropped, in this case? Soulbust (talk) 03:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Feel free to comment at the relevant RFD. I understand both perspectives, so I wanted to bring it up for community consensus. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft of blocked user

Courtesy link: Draft:NextCom Group

The above draft was made by a blocked user. Is it eligible to be deleted? Sorry for bothering you. Thank you, CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 15:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, CF-501 Falcon! Draft:NextCom Group would not be eligible for deletion based on the fact that it was created by a user who is currently blocked. The relevant speedy deletion criterion in this case would be G5, which only applies to articles created in violation of a block, i.e., created through block evasion. In this case, the draft will stand on its own merit. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, I didn't know that. I will keep that in mind. Thank you! CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 16:46, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding a new article that I am writing

Hi, I wanted your help to proofread and edit a new article I have written. Could you please help me out with that? Noor Badal Sharma (talk) 15:38, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Citation Barnstar
		This award is given to Significa liberdade for accumulating at least 90 points during the first quarter of 2025. Your contributions have helped reduce the backlog of unreferenced articles by ~5000 since the beginning of the year. Keep going and thanks for your citations! Cielquiparle (talk) 22:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Cielquiparle! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2025).

Administrator changes

Dennis Brown

Bureaucrat changes

Barkeep49

CheckUser changes

0xDeadbeef

Oversighter changes

GB fan

Moneytrees

Miscellaneous

Sign up for The Core Contest, a competition running from 15 April to 31 May to improve vital articles.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:46, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Friends lesbian kiss episode deletion

Hello Significa, I did not understand why you deleted this at WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 24#Friends lesbian kiss episode? Was it a mistake? Jay 💬 07:16, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jay! Thanks for bringing this up. After reviewing the discussion again, I've decided to reopen for another administrator to review. Personally, the next best option feels like closing as no consensus, but the arguments in favour of keeping the redirect as is are weak, making a no consensus close feel like the wrong call. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proffessor sir John Tooke deletion

I did not understand your deletion close of WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 19#Proffessor sir John Tooke. Can you add the reasoning? Jay 💬 07:29, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jay! I have now provided an explanation. In this case, I found the arguments to be stronger in favour of deletion than keeping. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:35, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to note that the redirect still exists and wasn't deleted. See: Proffessor sir John Tooke. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:29, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder, CycloneYoris! I had temporarily undeleted it to re-review the history. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AFC template issue

For some reason your April 6th AFC decline on Draft:Anndy Lian was displaying incorrectly. If my adjustment is incorrect, please adjust as desired. Changing ts to declinets was the error. I added decliner=Significa liberdade so that it was clear it was your review and not mine since I adjusted it. Best wishes, Zinnober9 (talk) 19:27, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Zinnober9! The odd display on the draft article was present before my edit. I only left a comment; I did not decline. I've gone ahead and removed the decline template with my name on it to resolve any confusion. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:05, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so it was, so sorry for the misattribution. I wasn't expecting the creator to add a decline to their own work so I took it to be yours. Thank you for the notice, and thank you for clearing that from the draft (I would have, had you not already). Zinnober9 (talk) 21:20, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:29, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Murder of Neha Hiremath for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Neha Hiremath, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Neha Hiremath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rosemary Burrows

Hello, a while ago you declined a draft of Rosemary Burrows for tone. I have substantially edited this piece for tone, and also added extra sources. Would you please take another look and see if you will approve it now? Thank you! FilmCostumes (talk) 20:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, FilmCostumes! Like many other reviewers, I do not generally accept requests to review an article, including articles I have reviewed in the past. I apologize for the inconvenience. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:53, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for review

@Significa liberdade https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kendriya_Vidyalaya_New_Cantt&oldid=1286097218 VS0GT (talk) 18:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, User:VS0GT! Like many other reviewers, I do not generally accept requests to review an article, including articles I have reviewed in the past. I apologize for the inconvenience. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:53, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade can you suggest me anyone for review VS0GT (talk) 19:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

VS0GT: Your article is in the queue, so an experienced editor will review it eventually. Given the number of reviewers and the number of draft articles submitted, this can take up to three months, though usually less. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks VS0GT (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Levesque

I see at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Levesque that you found the article "promotional". Interesting that today I noticed that the editor who created that article, and commented in the deletion discussion, was also an author one of the sources cited in the article. Interesting. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article Review

Hello @Significa liberdade I created these articles about 3 months ago and until now they haven’t been reviewed kinda demoralised me from creating more because as a new creator I wasn’t sure I was doing right since I got no reviews or comments on my edits. Kindly review them if any changes need be please I’m open to corrections. Thank you

here they are Angela Lewis, Carter Hudson, Hannah Cheramy, Niko Ceci. 伊丽莎白大声 (talk) 21:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kawa model

The article Kawa model you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kawa model for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dracophyllum -- Dracophyllum (talk) 13:24, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your evaluation of Rob Mark's biographical page.

I will be revising to add additional references. Appreciate your patience with this newbie. Paula abci (talk) 18:12, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

May 2025 Backlog Drive \| New pages patrol
On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]