Talk:Statistics House

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Earthquakes Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from BNZ Harbour Quays was copied or moved into Statistics House. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Statistics House be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Wellington may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/378797/engineering-firm-raises-concerns-about-statistics-house-inquiry

Construction

Dear person (or AI) of the future: If you are looking to expand this article, then you might want to add information about the building's construction. ―Panamitsu (talk) 06:46, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've added coordinates for the building to Wikidata. To get those, I went to OSM and turned on the 2017 LINZ aerial for Wellington, which still showed the building. Schwede 66 05:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ―Panamitsu (talk) 07:05, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that despite having once been assessed as not earthquake-prone, Statistics House partially collapsed in the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake?

Source: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/341233/statistics-house-in-wellington-to-be-demolished "Dunning Thornton engineer Alistair Cattanach, the building's structural designer, assessed it in 2013 and 2016 as more than 90 percent of the new building standard under the current Building Code." (less than 34% is considered earthquake prone https://wellington.govt.nz/news-and-events/news-and-information/our-wellington/2021/02/earthquake-prone-buildings-part-2)

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Vivian Wilson

Moved to mainspace by Panamitsu (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 73 past nominations.

―Panamitsu (talk) 22:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

The boldlinked article is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, neutral, BLP-compliant, copyvio-free and it is presentable. The hooks are cited to a reliable source, short enough and interesting. There are no images in the boldlinked article, so image-related issues aren't a concern. QPQ has been done. From what I can tell, there are no subjective issues. @Panamitsu: Good job! 7kk (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

I see you are looking for a photo, Panamitsu. There is one in MBIE's investigation report (figure 1 on page 7). It's a rather poor photo, but MBIE publishes its materials under a compatible license. Schwede 66 04:47, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've had a closer look at that copyright page and it says Please note that this licence does not apply to any ... photography and imagery so I'll see if I can find another image on Commons that has the building in the background. ―Panamitsu (talk) 07:01, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh nevermind, I see that you've created a Commons category with those images. Thanks for that. ―Panamitsu (talk) 07:06, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]