Template:Did you know nominations/Statistics House
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 23:38, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Statistics House
- ... that despite having once been assessed as not earthquake-prone, Statistics House partially collapsed in the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake?
- Source: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/341233/statistics-house-in-wellington-to-be-demolished "Dunning Thornton engineer Alistair Cattanach, the building's structural designer, assessed it in 2013 and 2016 as more than 90 percent of the new building standard under the current Building Code." (less than 34% is considered earthquake prone https://wellington.govt.nz/news-and-events/news-and-information/our-wellington/2021/02/earthquake-prone-buildings-part-2)
Moved to mainspace by Panamitsu (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 73 past nominations.
―Panamitsu (talk) 22:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC).
The boldlinked article is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, neutral, BLP-compliant, copyvio-free and it is presentable. The hooks are cited to a reliable source, short enough and interesting. There are no images in the boldlinked article, so image-related issues aren't a concern. QPQ has been done. From what I can tell, there are no subjective issues. @Panamitsu: Good job! 7kk (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
