Template:Did you know nominations/Vivian Wilson
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 08:32, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Vivian Wilson
- ... that Elon Musk's daughter Vivian Wilson, who is 21 today, recently featured on the cover of Teen Vogue?
- ALT1: ... that Vivian Wilson has been described as a nope baby? Source: https://www.theguardian.com/culture/article/2024/sep/04/nepo-to-nope-baby
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sobrevivendo no Inferno
- Comment: Driveby nom; there's a ton of stuff in Draft:Vivian Jenna Wilson that could be merged, courtesy ping to @Snokalok:. I request that this runs on 15 April.
Converted from a redirect by Horse Eye's Back (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 287 past nominations.
Launchballer 22:36, 23 March 2025 (UTC).
- Appreciated! Snokalok (talk) 23:02, 23 March 2025 (UTC) (Moved from talk page.--Launchballer 23:41, 23 March 2025 (UTC))
@Launchballer: Just a question to start this review off: this article was created by copying old text from Musk family and Elon Musk (Isaacson book), and a bit more new text seems to have been added. My interpretation of WP:DYKNEW was that copied content isn't considered new, so can't be accepted for DYK, but now when I look at it I can't find anything that says this. What do you think? ―Panamitsu (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hadn't noticed that. The relevant passage is WP:DYKLEN, which says this can count if less than one fifth if the content is copied.--Launchballer 23:39, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, I've learned someting new. To me it looks like more than a fifth of the article was copied from elsewhere, but before rejecting the review, do you know of any tools that can give us a number on how much of the article isn't original? ―Panamitsu (talk) 01:22, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
While I don't know how much text is original, I've counted the references and found that 17 out of 39 of them have been accessed in 2025, meaning that 22 of 39 sources were accessed in 2024 and earlier. This indicates that more than one fifth of the article is not new, meaning it is ineligible for DYK according to WP:DYKSPLIT. ―Panamitsu (talk) 01:27, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, I've learned someting new. To me it looks like more than a fifth of the article was copied from elsewhere, but before rejecting the review, do you know of any tools that can give us a number on how much of the article isn't original? ―Panamitsu (talk) 01:22, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hadn't noticed that. The relevant passage is WP:DYKLEN, which says this can count if less than one fifth if the content is copied.--Launchballer 23:39, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
