Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2025 June 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< June 26 << May | June | Jul >> June 28 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 27

[edit]

00:37, 27 June 2025 review of submission by Jaxonneid

[edit]

Why can't I make this page??? I dont think it should redirect to Karin Kirkpatrick Jaxonneid (talk) 00:37, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaxonneid You can create a draft, it is not protected. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:32, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

02:32, 27 June 2025 review of submission by TollVic

[edit]

Thanks for the feedback on the article. I wrote the article myself and then consulted an LLM to ensure I wasn't using promotional language. I made some minor edits based on that feedback and removed portions that probably weren't going to be acceptable, based on that feedback.

But the writing that I submitted is almost all mine. One piece of feedback I received, however, was "Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT," so I don't know how to respond to that. For example, I don't think there's anything speculative in the article, and there are no hallucinations in it.

A related piece of feedback that I received was: "Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed."

I thought I had accomplished that. Could you give me an example of two where this article falls short from your perspective? I'm happy to modify the article until it's considered acceptable.

Thanks again! TollVic (talk) 02:32, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's best to not use a LLM at all, then you can completely avoid your text looking like it was written by one. 331dot (talk) 10:47, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Most of your sources are written or otherwise by the same individual(Jessica Naziri) even though they are different outlets. A variety of authors would be better. 331dot (talk) 10:51, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

03:55, 27 June 2025 review of submission by Toxicjay

[edit]

what should i add Toxicjay (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Toxicjay: no need to add anything, this draft has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:36, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

04:58, 27 June 2025 review of submission by CHANMUNKIAT

[edit]

Because it has been declined a couple of times and it is very difficult to write in an encyclopedic manner, given the nature of the topic.

Would need some help from experienced editors to assist me. CHANMUNKIAT (talk) 04:58, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CHANMUNKIAT: we don't get involved in co-editing, and you're unlikely to find a collaborator here at the help desk; your best bet is probably one of the Wikiprojects, such as WikiProject Tibet. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:35, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. How do I submit my article then? CHANMUNKIAT (talk) 15:08, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

06:58, 27 June 2025 review of submission by Jean Khalife

[edit]

I don't know how to transforming my late father's info into an accepted form by Wikipedia, can anyone help me in doing that? Thanks PS: important references quantity is available Jean Khalife (talk) 06:58, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jean Khalife: firstly, you should disclose your conflict of interest (COI); I will post instructions on your talk page.
Secondly, and most importantly, you should find some reliable and independent sources, and summarise what they have said about your father. We're only interested in what has been previously published about him, not what you might know about him, because everything you say in this draft must be verifiable from a reliable source. See WP:GOLDENRULE.
You also shouldn't provide that long year-by-year chronology of everything he has done. Summarise his career in a couple of paragraphs (in prose), discuss his work (summarising published sources), etc. That makes for a much more readable and accessible format. See a few artist biographies as examples, ones that have been rated as 'good articles'; you can find these at WP:Good_articles/Art_and_architecture#Art. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:09, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

07:43, 27 June 2025 review of submission by Johnny Prey

[edit]

Good Day! I would like to as for a help on my draft. I already resubmitted a revised one removing possible advertising and promotional tone, however it was still not accepted. If you could guys help me which areas I can add on my article in order for it to be accepted will be much appreciated. Thank You! Johnny Prey (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the draft and it seems the main issue is notability. A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. So you need to add more sources in order to prove this organization is notable enough. Also if you have a conflict of interest or are related in some way to this company, you should disclose it in your profile or the draft's talk page. I hope my reply is helpful NeoGaze (talk) 14:33, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

07:52, 27 June 2025 review of submission by हर्ष कुमार झा

[edit]

Hello! My draft article on _Harsh Kumar Jha_ was recently declined. I want to improve it and need your guidance. Could you please let me know what specific issues need to be fixed (e.g. sources, tone, structure)? I'm ready to rewrite or restructure the draft as needed. Thanks in advance for your help! हर्ष कुमार झा (talk) 07:52, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @हर्ष कुमार झा. It was rejected - which means you can not re-submit. This person does not meet our criteria for an article on Wikipedia. qcne (talk) 07:53, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also note that autobiography in Wikipedia is very strongly discouraged, as it is almost impossible to do it successfully. Having found the necessary several sources where people wholly unconnected with you have chosen to publish material about you in reliable publications, you would then need to forget everything you know about yourself, and write a neutral summary of what those sources said. ColinFine (talk) 14:25, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

10:09, 27 June 2025 review of submission by 2A04:4A43:95DF:F744:FD29:F80F:A300:C0BD

[edit]

why was it rejected 2A04:4A43:95DF:F744:FD29:F80F:A300:C0BD (talk) 10:09, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You were given a clear reason for rejection by the reviewer. Additionally, Wikipedia is not for posting what I assume is your resume. See the autobiography policy. If you want to post your resume somewhere, use social media. 331dot (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

11:06, 27 June 2025 review of submission by Pankajasthaana

[edit]

I had added live references quoting independent media websites, linkedin posts and published webpage sources but the article was declined saying there are no sources mentioned. What did I miss? Pankajasthaana (talk) 11:06, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pankajasthaana You included a few external links but no actual references. Please very carefully read Help:Referencing for beginners and note that LinkedIn is not a reliable source so should not be used.
You also share a username with the CEO, so you must declare this conflict of interest immediately by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Failure to do this will result in your account being blocked. qcne (talk) 11:16, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

11:23, 27 June 2025 review of submission by Squareys

[edit]

Hi,

The draft was rejected with the following comment: > Needs independent sources about the engine itself, not games based on it.

However, as noted also in a reply, the article references many secondary independent reliable sources that are not about a game, but the engine itself.

So I am unclear on how I can sufficiently adjust the article to satisfy the request.

I appreciate any support on the matter.

Best Squareys (talk) 11:23, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Squareys What is the general nature of your conflict of interest?
Please point out the sources you feel do as the reviewer asks. 331dot (talk) 15:42, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

12:44, 27 June 2025 review of submission by Gicos74

[edit]

Help moving sandbox article to mainspace – Evelyn Famà Hi! I’ve written a new article in my sandbox about an Italian actress and stage performer, Evelyn Famà. The page includes biography, filmography, awards, references, and images I uploaded to Commons under CC BY-SA 4.0.

Here is the link to the draft: 🔗 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gicos74/Evelyn_Fam%C3%A0

I'm not yet autoconfirmed, so I’d appreciate if someone could review and help move it to the mainspace under the title: Evelyn Famà.

Thanks in advance for your support!

– User:Gicos74 Gicos74 (talk) 12:44, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gicos74: you need to submit the draft for review, by clicking that blue 'submit' button. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:48, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You say you've uploaded the photos and made them available under CC 4.0 – are you the photographer who took these photos, then? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:50, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello DoubleGrazing,
thank you for your question. The photos were provided directly to me by the actress herself, who owns the rights to them and explicitly authorized their upload to Wikimedia Commons under the CC BY 4.0 license. While I am not the photographer, I acted with the permission of the rights holder.
If needed, I can request a formal permission statement via OTRS (now VRT) to clarify this further.
Best regards,
User:Gicos74 Gicos74 (talk) 15:40, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the header to place the link within as intended, the whole url is not needed.
Yes, you will need to send that in. It is unusual for the subject of a photo to own the rights to it, typically the rights rest with the photographer, unless a contract assigned the rights to someone else. The permission may not be Fama's to give.
Do you have an association with her other than asking her for photos? 331dot (talk) 15:47, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will add that photos are not relevant to the draft process, which only considers the text and sources. Photos are an enhancement, not a requirement. 331dot (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

13:47, 27 June 2025 review of submission by Parmanand.jha.mh

[edit]

Hi! I recently created an article about Parmanand Jha. I tried to write it in a neutral tone and included a citation from a regional tech article. I’m not sure why it was marked for speedy deletion.

I would appreciate any guidance on how I can improve it so it meets Wikipedia’s guidelines. Parmanand.jha.mh (talk) 13:47, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Parmanand.jha.mh. I am afraid that this person (you?) does not meet our criteria for inclusion and therefore cannot have an article. It will be deleted as all it does is promote the person, which is contrary to our purpose. Please have a read of Wikipedia:Spam. qcne (talk) 13:50, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

16:03, 27 June 2025 review of submission by Ceeyemm

[edit]

hello, can someone please edit the page title (move) to make the "I" lowercase, I am not able to do so myself with my account yet. Thank you Ceeyemm (talk) 16:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ceeyemm: Draft names are at best provisional. When approved, the reviewer will almost certainly correct the name. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:07, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

17:20, 27 June 2025 review of submission by HVACScienceGuy

[edit]

My submission was just declined I appreciate your prompt review and feedback, but honestly, I can't imagine Positive Air Duct Cleaning having sources that are more in-depth, reliable, and there are plenty that are secondary and independent of the issue, from international associations and academies adopting the methodology, to it being the only method even allowed in Forensic Restoration, to it having been the topic of dozens of articles, podcasts and interviews in all 4 of the industry's top publications, to the founder having been opening keynote speaker at a global summit on crime scene remediation in Queensland, Australia, on the topic of the utilization of Positive Air Duct Cleaning in the event of fentanyl decontamination. HVACScienceGuy HVACScienceGuy (talk) 17:20, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HVACScienceGuy I fixed your header to provide a link to your draft as intended. You have three sources, none of which seem to be as you describe. Much of the draft is unsourced. 331dot (talk) 18:04, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's of what I was afraid. I accidentally submitted two versions, one incomplete followed by one complete one. I immediately got notice that one of them was deleted so the other could be reviewed. I suspected at the time that the complete one was deleted and the incomplete one retained and thus reviewed.
Positive Air Duct Cleaning is such an extremely supported methodology, it would be a shoe-in for a Wikipedia page. It's completely changed the way HVAC is cleaned and decontaminated worldwide. It's the only method allowed at this point for Forensic Restoration.
I'll reformat and resubmit. HVACScienceGuy (talk) 20:27, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@HVACScienceGuy You submitted two identical drafts, Draft:Positive Air Duct Cleaning and Draft:Postive Air Duct Cleaning. One was declined as a duplicate and the other was declined for failure to show Wikipedia's definition of notability; neither was deleted. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 23:20, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

18:23, 27 June 2025 review of submission by Shivam4apr

[edit]

Hello, I need help moving my sandbox article (User:Shivam4apr/sandbox) to the Draft namespace as Draft:DOME Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. for review under Articles for Creation. Thank you! Shivam4apr (talk) 18:23, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Shivam4apr this appears to have been done, see Draft:DOME Entertainment Pvt. Ltd which was just declined. S0091 (talk) 18:55, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

20:50, 27 June 2025 review of submission by 2001:B07:5D37:FC3F:D011:BF9E:8154:EA7C

[edit]

May I ask you why the draft is against the purpose of Wikipedia? 2001:B07:5D37:FC3F:D011:BF9E:8154:EA7C (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I left a comment explaining why I rejected it: its a purely promotional draft about a company, and promotional content is not acceptable in Wikipedia. If you prove this company is notable beyond a shadow of a doubt by adding substantial, independent and reliable sources (as well as extensive rewritting) I will reconsider undoing the rejection. Hope my reply helps. NeoGaze (talk) 22:18, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

20:52, 27 June 2025 review of submission by Emersonjd3199

[edit]

I was told this person is not considered notable enough to have a wikipedia page. However, I would like to note that his business partnership with Stan Kroenke (who has a wikipedia page), involvement in billions of dollars of real estate development, and impact on the jewish community nationally seems very noteworthy. Several of my references were used as references for THF Realty and Stan Kroenke's page, but are being considered unreliable? Emersonjd3199 (talk) 20:52, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not inherited by association with notable people. You need sources that show that Mr. Staenberg is notable via his own actions, not merely because he associated with others. 331dot (talk) 21:06, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2025_June_27&oldid=1298532240"