Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Green Book/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 13 April 2025 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by Green Book (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Sgubaldo (talk) 18:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Green Book follows Frank Vallelonga, who is hired as a chauffeur by Don Shirley for a tour of concert venues in the Deep South. The Sakurai Prize nomination has picked up two supports and passed a source review, so I am adding a second one. Sgubaldo (talk) 18:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Source and image review from TheDoctorWho
[edit]Comments are based off of this revision:
- List only has two images; one originally uploaded to Flickr under a CC-By license; the other uploaded under CC-0
- Images have captions and alt text
- Ref 5: I'm concerned about the reliability of Box Office Mojo considering it's owned and published by WP:IMDb.
- As far as I'm aware, BOM does not contain user-generated content like the main IMDb. It's also included in WP:FILMSOURCES.
- Ref 10: Missing a work/website
- Added.
- Ref 11: Appears this should be url-access=subscription rather than registration
- Changed.
- Ref 12: Missing a work/website
- Added.
- Ref 14: Needs url-access=subscription
- Added.
- Ref 15: Website needs piped to Salon
- Sure, changed.
- Ref 17: WP:NEWSWEEK is unreliable post-2013
- Replaced with a Vanity Fair one.
- Ref 31: Missing a work/website
- Added.
- Ref 41: Needs an Italian language tag
- Added.
- Ref 63: Needs a Japanese language tag
- Added.
- Ref 66: Has a listed author that needs added
- Added.
- Ref 82: Still has a form of live link just needs swapped out and updated
- Changed.
- Ref 90: Dead link
- Removed url-status=live.
- Spot checked references 2, 15, 19, 24, 27, 36, 41, 46, 50, 54, 60, 68, 70, 74, 81, 85, 92, 94
- Ref 2: Doesn't confirm Victor Hugo Green as the author
- Added another source to back this up.
- Ref 2: Doesn't confirm Victor Hugo Green as the author
No major issues here, just a few things to address. TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:02, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @TheDoctorWho, done. Sgubaldo (talk) 15:08, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Nice work, source and image reviews pass! TheDoctorWho (talk) 18:08, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey man im josh
[edit]This review is based on this version of the article.
- Ref 39 – Change website to Cinema for Peace awards to match the target
- I feel like the target itself needs moving, but for the purposes of the FLC, I've changed website. Sgubaldo (talk) 00:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Ref 55 – Why is this marked as dead? The page is live and the archived version doesn't show anything that the current one doesn't. The current version just shows more recent nominees as well.
- I must've just accidentally not put |url-status=live. Not marked as dead anymore.
- Ref 55 – Should link to Heartland International Film Festival instead
- Done.
- Ref 93 – Website listed as "Next Best Picture" whereas refs 45 and 90 use "NextBestPicture". Be consistent.
- Changed Ref. 93
- Heartland Film Festival in the table should be Heartland International Film Festival Awards
- Changed.
With a focus on consistency in reference formatting, that's all I've got. Please ping me when these have been addressed. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hey man im josh, done. Thanks for the review. Sgubaldo (talk) 00:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. I'm not opposed to Cinema for Peace awards being moved, I actually don't have an opinion on it, but I do think we need to match the target. I'll leave whether it should be moved up to you and anybody else involved. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:19, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]- "limited release in 20 cities, in the United States, on" - no need for those commas
- "However, some also criticised" - American subject so that last word should be spelt with a Z
- "Ali was further recognised" - same here
- That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:18, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude, done. Thanks for the review. Sgubaldo (talk) 10:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:46, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OlifanofmrTennant
[edit]- There was some contravery with Green Books win at the Oscars [2][3][4]
- I've added a foonote with information the first two links. The third source just rehashes the Independent interview with Mortensen, which is already cited. Sgubaldo (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Don Shirley should have the actor listed for consistency with Frank "Tony Lip" Vallelonga
- Done. Sgubaldo (talk) 21:33, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- "(where the film earned seven nominations)" and " (where the film garnered nominations in four categories)" seem unnecessary as the section is about Ali
- The section is about the film, and so I think the bits in parentheses are necessary. I just thought starting with 'Ali was further recognised...' flowed well from before. I can change it if you deem it best. Sgubaldo (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think the two "(Ali)" are needed as the other recipients aren't listed
- Done. Sgubaldo (talk) 21:33, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- "The film was also nominated in five categories at the 76th Golden Globe Awards, where it won Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy, Best Supporting Actor – Motion Picture (Ali), and Golden Globe Award for Best Screenplay – at the 76th Golden Globe Awards, where it had been nominated in five categories." Repetitively worded
- Done. Sgubaldo (talk) 21:33, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- The "Ref" column should be "Ref(s)" as some have multiple citations
- Done. Sgubaldo (talk) 21:33, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Ping me when done Questions? four Olliefant (she/her) 21:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Apologies for the delay, will get this done sometime before Tuesday. Sgubaldo (talk) 00:21, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Sgubaldo: Following up to see if you took care of this, and hopefully to have you address the comment below as well. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:50, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @OlifanofmrTennant, done, one comment above. Sgubaldo (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Apologies for the delay, will get this done sometime before Tuesday. Sgubaldo (talk) 00:21, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Birdienest81
[edit]- Ref 56: E! Online could be just labeled as E! since they are of the same entity unlike BBC or BBC News.
- Ref 91: CBS19 should be be labeled directly WCAV since that's the official identification (in this case the callsign) of the station here on Wikipedia.
- Done. Sgubaldo (talk) 19:10, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Also for Ref 91: If this list is using publisher in the ref, it should be listed as Lockwood Broadcast Group since that's the owner of the station and there is no indication within the article that CBS News was involved with the authorship of the article (if there was indication that it was published by Reuters or Associated Press, that would be a different case).
- I've just removed the publisher in that case. Sgubaldo (talk) 19:10, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Otherwise everything looks fine. Would you mind taking a look at 50th Academy Awards for featured list promotion?
- Done. Do you still need comments on your FLC, @Birdienest81. Sgubaldo (talk) 19:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Sgubaldo: No, but I do need comments on the FLC page for List of Los Angeles Rams starting quarterbacks. I don't know how well versed you are in terms of American football, but I guess maybe you could check for grammar or such. Otherwise, I give a support' for this list to be promoted to FL status. Birdienest81talk 07:50, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted. --PresN 22:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.