Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"WP:CFD" redirects here. For criteria for deletion, see WP:Criteria for deletion.
"WP:CFR" redirects here. For criteria for redaction, see WP:Criteria for redaction.
Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion
XFD backlog
V May Jun Jul Aug Total
CfD 0 0 65 0 65
TfD 0 1 44 0 45
MfD 0 2 0 0 2
FfD 0 1 16 0 17
RfD 0 0 17 0 17
AfD 0 0 4 0 4

Categories for discussion (CfD) is the central venue for discussing specific proposals to delete, merge, rename or split categories and stub types in accordance with the guidelines for categorization, category naming and stub articles.

For detailed instructions about using CfD, see "How to use CfD" below. Briefly, nominations are handled through one of two processes:

  1. Speedy renaming and merging, for uncontroversial proposals that meet specified criteria—see "Speedy renaming and merging" below.
  2. Full discussion, for all other proposals. Discussions typically remain open for at least seven days and are closed once a rough consensus has formed or no objections to the nomination are raised.

Except in uncontroversial cases such as reverting vandalism, do not amend or depopulate a category once it has been nominated at CfD as this hampers other editors' efforts to evaluate a category and participate in the discussion.

Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a CfD request that is limited in scope to renaming, as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the request closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of a CfD move discussion to determine whether or not the close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines. CfDs involving deletion should be reviewed at Wikipedia:Deletion review.

Scope

[edit]
Shortcut

CfD is intended only for specific proposals to delete, merge, rename or split categories or stub types. For general discussion about how to improve the category system, use other appropriate venues such as Wikipedia talk:Categorization, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Categories, and any relevant WikiProjects' talk pages.

Current discussions

[edit]

Add a new entry

Closing procedure

[edit]
Main page: Wikipedia:Deletion process § Closing discussions that have run their full time
Shortcut

After seven days, an administrator (or possibly a non-admin) will determine if consensus has formed, and close the discussion. If appropriate, the discussion instead may be relisted to allow for more discussion. Editors closing discussions must follow the administrator instructions and implement the result or log it at the Working page to ensure it is implemented. As noted at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions, non-admins may follow the process at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Working, and list discussion results there for an admin to review, and to log to the page directly.

Discussions awaiting closure

[edit]

How to nominate a category for discussion

[edit]
Shortcut

Nomination procedure

[edit]

Twinkle

[edit]

You may use Twinkle to facilitate CfD nominations. To install Twinkle, go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets and check "Twinkle" in the "Browsing" section. Use the now-installed "XfD" (Start a deletion discussion) tab while viewing the page you want to nominate.

Twinkle only allows you to nominate a single category or stub template. For bundled nominations including multiple categories, see § MassCFD.

MassCFD

[edit]

You can use the script User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/massXFD to automatically make mass nominations.

Manual nominations

[edit]
I
Preliminary steps.

Before nominating a category:

In the following special cases:

For further information, see Wikipedia:Categorization and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.

II
Edit the category.

Add one of the following templates at the beginning of the category page (not the talk page) of every category to be discussed. For nominations involving large numbers of categories, help adding these templates can be requested here.

Otherwise, if nominating a single category:
If nominating a group of related categories, use a bundled nomination:
  • For deleting, use {{subst:Cfd|CfD section name}}
  • For merging, use {{subst:Cfm|Other category|CfD section name}}
    • For merging to two categories, use {{subst:Cfm-double|Other category 1|Other category 2|CfD section name}}
  • For renaming, use {{subst:Cfr|Proposed name|CfD section name}}
  • For splitting, use {{subst:Cfs|Proposed name 1|Proposed name 2|CfD section name}}
  • For converting the category into a list, {{subst:Cfl|Proposed name|CfD section name}}
  • For other options (containerization, etc.), use {{subst:Cfd|type=nature of proposed discussion|CfD section name}} (see Template:Cfd/doc#Optional parameter)
  • Include "CfD", "CfM", "CfR", "CfS" or "CfL" in the edit summary, and do not mark the edit as minor. Preview before saving.
  • To add the template for previous nomination days, use the "full" version of the template by appending "full" to the template name, i.e. {{cfd full}}, {{cfm full}}, {{cfr full}}, {{cfs full}} and {{cfl full}}. Use the |day=, |month= and |year= parameters to make the banner link to the correct CfD page.
  • Consider adding {{subst:cfd notice|Category name|2025 August 1|CfD section name}} ~~~~ to the talk page of the category's creator.
  • For details about these templates, see each template's documentation.
III
Create the CFD section.

Click THIS LINK to edit the section of CfD for today's entries.

Follow the instructions (visible in edit mode) to copy and paste one of the templates below. When inserting category names into these template's parameters, except the text= parameter, omit the Category: prefix and do not use wikilinks, as the template takes care of this.

If nominating a single category:
  • For deleting, use {{subst:Cfd2|Obsolete category|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}
  • For merging, use {{subst:Cfm2|Origin category|Destination category|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed merge. ~~~~}}
    • For merging to two categories, use {{subst:Cfm2|Origin category|Destination category 1|target2=Destination category 2|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed merge. ~~~~}}
  • For renaming, use {{subst:Cfr2|Current category|Proposed name|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed rename. ~~~~}}
  • For splitting, use {{subst:Cfs2|Current category|Proposed category 1|Proposed category 2|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed split. ~~~~}}
  • For converting the category into a list, use {{subst:Cfc2|Current category|Proposed article|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed conversion. ~~~~}}
  • For other options (containerization, etc.), use {{subst:Cfd2|Current category|type=other type|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed conversion. ~~~~}}
For a bundled nomination, use one of the standard templates to build the "Cfd section name" for the first nominated category. After saving that, the second and subsequent nominations must be inserted manually, as follows:
==== Cfd section name ====
* 1st category
* 2nd category [Make clear whether you propose deletion, merging or renaming]
* Your reason for nominating the categories, and signature.
  • If a bundled nomination is too long, consider using {{hidden}} to hide some of the nominated categories.
  • In your reason, use links if mentioning articles or categories. To link to a category, use the colon trick by adding a colon (:) to the beginning of the link, e.g. [[:Category:Foo]].
  • Preview before saving to check that your nomination is formatted correctly, and remember to include your signature at the end of the nomination.

Stub types

[edit]
I
Preliminary steps.

In general, a stub type consists of a stub template and a dedicated stub category. Before nominating a stub type for deletion, merging or renaming:

  • Read and understand guidance for creating stub types and stub type naming conventions.
  • Review the list of existing stub types—be advised, this list may not be comprehensive.
  • If you wish to:
    • Create a new stub type—follow the procedure for proposing new stub types.
    • Delete, merge or rename a stub category only, without deleting or renaming the associated stub template—follow the instructions above this section.
    • Delete or rename a stub template—continue to section II.
II
Edit the template.

Add one of the following tags at the beginning of the template to be discussed.

  • For deletion, use {{subst:Sfd-t|Section name}}
  • For renaming, use {{subst:Sfr-t|Proposed name|Section name}}
  • Please include "SFD" or "SFR" in the edit summary, and don't mark the edit as minor. Preview before saving.
  • Consider notifying the template's creator on their talk page. To find the contributor, check the page history of the stub template.
III
Create the CFD section.

Click THIS LINK to edit the section of CfD for today's entries.

Follow the instructions (visible in edit mode) and paste the following text (remember to update the default parameters):

  • For deletion, use {{subst:sfd-t2|TemplateName|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}
  • For renaming, use {{subst:sfr-t2|TemplateOldName|TemplateNewName|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}
  • In your rationale, mention how many articles currently use the template to help other editors. When linking to a category in your rationale, always add a colon (:) to the beginning of the link, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes a category link that can be seen on the page, and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating.
  • Preview before saving to check that your nomination is formatted correctly, and remember to include your signature at the end of the nomination.

Notifying interested projects and editors

[edit]

In addition to the steps listed above, you may choose to invite participation by editors who are likely to be informed about a nominated category. All such efforts must comply with Wikipedia's guideline against biased canvassing. In addition, to help make your messages about the CfD discussion clear, avoid Wikipedia-specific abbreviations, link to relevant policies or guidelines, and link to the discussion itself.

Notifying related WikiProjects

WikiProjects consist of groups of editors who are interested in a particular subject. If a nominated category is within the scope of one or more WikiProjects, consider adding a brief, neutral note on their talk page(s) about the nomination. You may use {{subst:cfd notice|Category name|2025 August 1|CfD section name}} ~~~~ or write a personalized message.

Tagging the nominated category's talk page with a relevant WikiProject's banner will include the category in that WikiProject's Article Alerts if they subscribe to the system. For instance, tagging a nominated category with {{WikiProject Physics}} will add the discussion to Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Article alerts.

Notifying substantial contributors to the category

While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and main contributors of the category that you are nominating for discussion. To find the creator and main contributors, check the category's page history or talk page. You may use {{Cfd notice}} to inform the category's creator and all other editors.

Notifying other interested editors

It may be helpful to invite other subject-matter experts by posting a message on the talk page of the most closely related article, such as Protein family for Category:Protein families. You may use {{Cfdnotice}} for this.

Speedy renaming and merging

Shortcuts

Speedy renaming or speedy merging of categories may be requested only if they meet a speedy criterion, for example WP:C2D (consistency with main article's name) or WP:C2C (consistency with established category tree names). Please see instructions below.

  1. Determine which speedy criterion applies
  2. Tag category page with {{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}} or {{subst:cfm-speedy|Merge target}}
  3. List request along with speedy criteria reason under "Current requests" below on this page

Please note that a speedy request must state which of the narrowly defined criteria strictly applies. Hence, any other non-speedy criteria, even "common sense" or "obvious", may be suitable points, but only at a full discussion at WP:Categories for discussion.

Requests may take 48 hours to process after listing if there are no objections. This delay allows other users to review the request to ensure that it meets the speedy criteria for speedy renaming or merging, and to raise objections to the proposed change.

Categories that qualify for speedy deletion (per Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, e.g., "patent nonsense", "recreation") can be tagged with the regular speedy tags, such as {{db|reason}} with no required delay. Empty categories can be deleted if they remain empty 7 days after tagging with {{db-empty}}. Renaming under C2E may also be processed instantly (at the discretion of an administrator) as it is a variation on G7.

To oppose a speedy request you must record your objection within 48 hours of the nomination. Do this by inserting immediately under the nomination:

  • Oppose, (the reasons for your objection). ~~~~

You will not be able to do this by editing the page WP:Categories for discussion. Instead, you should edit the section WP:Categories for discussion#Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here or the page WP:Categories for discussion/Speedy#Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here (WP:CFDS). Be aware that in the course of any discussion, the nomination and its discussion may get moved further down the page purely for organizational convenience – you may need to search WP:CFDS to find the new location. Participate in any ongoing discussion, but unless you withdraw your opposition, a knowledgeable person may eventually bring forward the nomination and discussion to become a regular CFD discussion. At that stage you may add further comments, but your initial opposition will still be considered. However, if after seven days there has been no support for the request, and no response from the nominator, the request may be dropped from further consideration as a speedy.

Contested speedy requests become stale, and can be untagged and delisted after 7 days of inactivity. Optionally, if the discussion may be useful for future reference, it may be copied to the category talk page, with a section heading and {{moved discussion from|[[WP:CFDS]]|2=~~~~}}. If the nominator wants to revive the process, this may be requested at WP:Categories for discussion (CfD) in accordance with its instructions.

If you belatedly notice and want to oppose a speedy move that has already been processed, contact one of the admins who process the Speedy page. If your objection seems valid, they may reverse the move, or start a full CFD discussion.

Speedy criteria

[edit]
Shortcut

The category-specific criteria for speedy renaming, or merging are strictly limited to:

C2A: Typographic and spelling fixes

[edit]
Shortcut
  • Correction of spelling errors and capitalization fixes. Differences between British and American spelling (e.g. Harbours → Harbors) are not considered errors; however if the convention of the relevant category tree is to use one form over the other then a rename may be appropriate under C2C. If both spellings exist as otherwise-identical category names, they should be merged.
  • Appropriate conversion of hyphens into en dashes or vice versa (e.g. Category:Canada-Russia relations → Category:Canada–Russia relations).
  • Correction of obvious grammatical errors, such as a missing conjunction (e.g. Individual frogs toads → Individual frogs and toads). This includes pluralizing a noun in the name of a set category, but not when disagreement might reasonably be anticipated as to whether the category is a topic or set category.

C2B: Consistency with established Wikipedia naming conventions and practices

[edit]
Shortcut

C2C: Consistency with established category tree names

[edit]
Shortcut

Bringing a category into line with established naming conventions for that category tree, or into line with the various "x by y", "x of y", or "x in y" categorization conventions specified at Wikipedia:Category names

  • This should be used only where there is no room for doubt that the category in question is being used for the standard purpose instead of being a potential subcategory.
  • This criterion should be applied only when there is no ambiguity or doubt over the existence of a category naming convention. Such a convention must be well defined and must be overwhelmingly used within the tree. If this is not the case then the category in question must be brought forward to a full Cfd nomination.
  • This criterion will not apply in cases where the category tree observes distinctions in local usage (e.g. Category:Transportation in the United States and Category:Transport in the United Kingdom).

C2D: Consistency with main article's name

[edit]
Shortcut
  • Renaming a topic category to match its eponymous page (e.g. Category:The Beatles and The Beatles).
  • This applies only if the related page's current name (and by extension, the proposed name for the category) is:
    • unambiguous (so it generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is the primary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator); and
    • uncontroversial, either because of longstanding stability at that particular name, or because the page was just moved (i) after a page move discussion resulted in explicit consensus to rename, or (ii) unilaterally to reflect an official renaming which is verified by one or more citations (provided in the nomination). C2D does not apply if the result would be contrary to guidelines at WP:CATNAME, or there is any ongoing discussion about the name of the page or category, or there has been a recent discussion concerning any of the pages that resulted in a no consensus result, or it is controversial in some other way.
  • This criterion may also be used to rename a set category in the same circumstances, where the set is defined by a renamed topic; e.g. players for a sports team, or places in a district.
  • Before nominating a category to be renamed per WP:C2D, consider whether it makes more sense to move the article instead of the category.

C2E: Author request

[edit]
Shortcut
  • This criterion applies only if the author of a category requests or agrees to renaming within six months of creating the category.
  • The criterion does not apply if other editors have populated or changed the category since it was created. "Other editors" includes bots that populated the category, but excludes an editor working with the author on the renaming.

C2F: One eponymous page

[edit]
Shortcut
  • This criterion applies if the category contains only an eponymous article, list, template or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories, where applicable. Nominations should use {{subst:cfm-speedy}} (speedy merger) linking to a suitable parent category, or to another appropriate category (e.g. one that is currently on the article). When listing the nomination at WP:CFDS, you must manually add all the appropriate parent categories as targets if the member page is not already in them.

Admin instructions

[edit]

When handling the listings:

  1. Make sure that the listing meets one of the above criteria.
  2. With the exception of C2E, make sure that it was both listed and tagged at least 48 hours previously.
  3. Make sure that there is no opposition to the listing; if there is a discussion, check if the opposing user(s) ended up withdrawing their opposition.

If the listing meets these criteria, simply have the category renamed or merged – follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Administrator instructions, in the section "If the decision is to Rename, Merge, or Delete"; to list it for the bots, use the Speedy moves section.

Applying speedy criteria in full discussions

[edit]
  • A nomination to merge or rename, brought forward as a full CfD, may be speedily closed if the closing administrator is satisfied that:
    • The nomination clearly falls within the scope of one of the criteria listed here, and
    • No objections have been made within 48 hours of the initial nomination.
  • If both these conditions are satisfied, the closure will be regarded as having been a result of a speedy nomination. If any objections have been raised then the CfD nomination will remain in place for the usual 7-day discussion period, to be decided in accordance with expressed consensus.

Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here

[edit]

If the category and desired change do not match one of the criteria mentioned in C2, do not list it here. Instead, list it in the main CFD section.

If you are in any doubt as to whether it qualifies, do not list it here.

Use the following format on a new line at the beginning of the list: 

* [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~

If the current name should be redirected rather than deleted, use: 

* REDIRECT [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~

To note that human action is required, e.g. updating a template that populates the category, use: 

* NO BOTS [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~

Remember to tag the category page with: {{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}}

A request may be completed if it is more than 48 hours old; that is, if the time stamp shown is earlier than 04:43, 30 July 2025 (UTC). Currently, there are 98 open requests (refresh).

Current requests

[edit]

Please add new requests at the top of the list, preferably with a link to the parent category (in case of C2C) or relevant article (in case of C2D).

Not just "Siena University" because that's a disambig. Jahaza (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please leave redirects for this genre of categories so that the templates behave ( Template:Monarchs by nationality and century category header) SMasonGarrison 01:13, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Opposed requests

[edit]

On hold pending other discussion

[edit]

Moved to full discussion

[edit]
The article is located at Asian Americans, so C2D would suggest omitting the hyphen. – numbermaniac 14:27, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Myasuda @Numbermaniac can one of you bring this to full to make these consistent? SMasonGarrison 20:53, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Moved to a full discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 July 31#Category:Asian-American state legislators in Arizona. – numbermaniac 09:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LordTort (talk) 16:00, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose all. Not consistent with WAG, SAG, DGA, PGA, or Teen Choice Awards. Not convinced this is really a consensus. Jahaza (talk) 04:07, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Except SAG, in fact, has the Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Leading Role Screen Actors Guild Award winners category, not the Screen Actors Guild Award for Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Leading Role (without "for" in it), which is further proof of my point. The DGA doesn't even have specific categories for its feature or TV winners; they are all sorted into the single Directors Guild of America Award winners category. The same goes for WGA; all its winners are sorted into Writers Guild of America Award winners. As for the PGA, it doesn't have a category for its winners at all. So I stand by my request. LordTort (talk) 11:18, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please compare Best Editing BAFTA Award winners and Best Film Editing Academy Award winners with European Film Award for Best Editor winners. The former two omitted "for" in the category name. The same goes for Best Sound Mixing Academy Award winners, Best Sound Editing Academy Award winners, or Best Sound BAFTA Award winners, as opposed to European Film Award for Best Sound Designer winners. Same with Best Production Design AACTA Award winners, Best Production Design BAFTA Award winners, Best Art Direction Academy Award winners, and European Film Award for Best Production Designer winners.
If you prefer referencing SAG, all their categories are created without "for" in their names and go through the standard naming practice; see Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture Screen Actors Guild Award winners or any category of their winners. WGA, DGA, PGA, and Teen Choice Awards articles, to name a few, are irrelevant in this matter, as their awards don't have specific subcategories for their winners. LordTort (talk) 13:01, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've renominated this for a full renaming discussion here. AHI-3000 (talk) 18:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ready for deletion

[edit]

Check Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion for out of process deletions. In some cases, these will need to be nominated for discussion and the editor who emptied the category informed that they should follow the WP:CFD process.

Once the renaming has been completed, copy and paste the listing to the Ready for deletion section of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual.

Empty categories awaiting deletion

[edit]

The categories listed below have been identified as empty using {{db-catempty}}, and will be speedily deleted after 7 days unless populated. (Note: Due to technical limitations, all contents of the category may not be displayed; view the category directly to see all contents.)

Empty categories awaiting deletion
Al-Tasamoh FC players
Ambassadors of Saudi Arabia to Slovakia
Ambassadors of Saudi Arabia to Slovenia
Ambassadors of Saudi Arabia to Austria
Saudi Arabian expatriates in Austria
2009 in Ugandan cricket
2009 in Bermudian cricket
Ugandan cricket tours of Bermuda
Speedway in Bulgaria
2024 in Bermudian cricket
2025 in Bermudian cricket
Japanese people of Mozambican descent
Japan–Mozambique relations
Malpaís (group) albums
Janvs albums
World music albums by Costa Rican artists
Libyan people of Croatian descent
Libyan people of Hungarian descent
Libyan people of Bosnia and Herzegovina descent
Hungarian people of Libyan descent
Hungary–Libya relations
Azerbaijani people of Avar descent
Companies based in Baguio
Galician stoner rock musical groups
South American protopunk groups
2025–26 in African women's football
1990–91 in African women's football
1994–95 in African women's football
1998–99 in African women's football
2000–01 in African women's football
2001–02 in African women's football
2002–03 in African women's football
2004–05 in African women's football
2003–04 in African women's football
2005–06 in African women's football
2006–07 in African women's football
2009–10 in African women's football
2010–11 in African women's football
2007–08 in African women's football
Battles in 1842
1053 establishments in England
1053 establishments by country
1053 in England
1053 by country
2009 New Mexico elections
2013 New Mexico elections
2017 New Mexico elections
Jwayya SC players
1983–84 in European women's association football leagues
1983–84 domestic women's association football leagues
1984–85 in European women's association football leagues
1984–85 domestic women's association football leagues
1985–86 in European women's association football leagues
1986–87 in European women's association football leagues
1986–87 domestic women's association football leagues
1985–86 domestic women's association football leagues
1987–88 in European women's association football leagues
1987–88 domestic women's association football leagues
Tesla Boy songs
2026–27 in European youth football
2026–27 in youth association football
1999–2000 in European youth football
Vesperian Sorrow albums
2001–02 in European youth football
2003–04 in European youth football
1954–55 in European youth football
1955–56 in European youth football
1957–58 in European youth football
1956–57 in European youth football
1958–59 in European youth football
1959–60 in European youth football
1961–62 in European youth football
1960–61 in European youth football
1962–63 in European youth football
1963–64 in European youth football
1964–65 in European youth football
1965–66 in European youth football
1966–67 in European youth football
1967–68 in European youth football
1968–69 in European youth football
1969–70 in European youth football
1970–71 in European youth football
1971–72 in European youth football
1972–73 in European youth football
1973–74 in European youth football
1974–75 in European youth football
1976–77 in European youth football
1975–76 in European youth football
1977–78 in European youth football
1979–80 in European youth football
1978–79 in European youth football
1980–81 in European youth football
1981–82 in European youth football
1982–83 in European youth football
1990–91 in European youth football
1992–93 in European youth football
1993–94 in European youth football
1995–96 in European youth football
1996–97 in European youth football
1997–98 in European youth football
Seasons in Oceanian youth football
1985–86 in European youth football
1991–92 in European youth football
1998–99 in European youth football
2000–01 in European youth football
1984–85 in European youth football
2002–03 in European youth football
1983–84 in European youth football
1994–95 in European youth football
LGBTQ+ studies redlink lists
1979 establishments in Slovenia
1977 establishments in Slovenia
Seasons in North American youth football
Seasons in South American youth football
Artificial intelligence software
Burials in Ghazipur
Burials in Goa
Burials in Yogyakarta
Burials in Kazerun
Burials in County Cork
Reformed Baptists denominations in Europe
Royal House of Johor
Burial sites of the De la Roche family
Mexican expatriate sportspeople in Estonia
Mexican expatriates in Estonia
Actors from Elmore County, Alabama
2025 animal births
2025–26 in Asian youth football
2023–24 in Asian youth football
2021–22 in Asian youth football
2022–23 in Asian youth football
2020–21 in Asian youth football
Politicians from Kuala Lumpur
Burial sites of the House of Ardennes-Verdun
Ghanaian people of Sindhi descent
Zambian people of Sindhi descent
Zambian people of Punjabi descent
Investment management companies of Turkey
Badminton competitions in Bolivia
Wikipedia featured topics Physical geography of Somerset good content
Wikipedia featured topics Physical geography of Somerset
1995 establishments in the Community of Madrid
Wikipedia featured topics Characters of Smallville good content
Wikipedia featured topics Characters of Smallville
Baldwin Wallace Yellow Jackets basketball
Burial sites of the House of Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg
Burials in County Westmeath
Burials in the Province of Udine
Burials in le Marche
Burial sites of the House of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
Cebuano child actors
Characters created by Martin Egeland
Chechen sportspeople
Martial arts in Chechnya
Cemeteries in Wuhan
Sports in Chechnya
Warfare of the Iron Age
Warfare of the Bronze Age
Cemeteries in Tianjin
Cemeteries in Suzhou
Cemeteries in Changsha
Cemeteries in Chongqing
Cemeteries in Hangzhou
Comics art by Gil Kane
Cemeteries in Guangzhou
Iron Age architecture
Bronze Age architecture
2007 crimes in the United States by state
2008 crimes in the United States by state
2006 crimes in the United States by state
Bermudian guitarists
Buildings and structures in Wicklow
1958–59 in Asian youth football
1958–59 in youth association football
1957–58 in youth association football
1959–60 in Asian youth football
1960–61 in Asian youth football
1961–62 in Asian youth football
1962–63 in Asian youth football
1963–64 in Asian youth football
1964–65 in Asian youth football
1965–66 in Asian youth football
1966–67 in Asian youth football
1967–68 in Asian youth football
1968–69 in Asian youth football
1969–70 in Asian youth football
1970–71 in Asian youth football
1971–72 in Asian youth football
1972–73 in Asian youth football
1973–74 in Asian youth football
1974–75 in Asian youth football
1975–76 in Asian youth football
1976–77 in Asian youth football
1978–79 in Asian youth football
1979–80 in Asian youth football
1982–83 in Asian youth football
1984–85 in Asian youth football
1985–86 in Asian youth football
1986–87 in Asian youth football
1987–88 in Asian youth football
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion&oldid=1303553775"