User talk:United Blasters/Archive 1

Archive 1

June 2024

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Star Maa, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 19:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

What's the problem? Check other Star channels's Wikipedia there is a section for Sister Channels, because it doesn't have separate Wikipedia. What source you need here? These channels are available in India. Please learn about Disney Star channels United Blasters (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Star Suvarna, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 17:54, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

SLK

if got jersey news add to clubs, some not easy to pick correct pattern. 93.138.223.133 (talk) 11:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Okay, I will try to do that. United Blasters (talk) 16:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 01:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

United Blasters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't have any connection with the mentioned account, the only similarity is that I also edited football contents, is it a proof for being sock? Please recheck this, this is a misunderstanding occurred to you. Please unblock me United Blasters (talk) 07:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There are various clues to me that suggest this is not a matter of merely being in the same topic area. 331dot (talk) 08:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2024 unblock request 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

United Blasters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's not comedy, take it seriously, Please reinvestigate the sock, this account is not a sock. I agree that, I found some similarities with mentioned account. I uploaded Logos of FOOTBALL Clubs, because I trying to better Kerala Football articles with good faith. Please reconsider it. Last, I confirm that there is no actual connection with mentioned account, only some similarly in editing topic. Any other admins here?

Accept reason:

Having received an explanation of the original block via email, I recognize that there is some behavioral similarity between UB and Bobanfasil, but believe that this could plausibly just be a coincidence, and thus in the absence of any other obvious disruption I am going to go ahead and unblock with the assent of both admins previously involved in placing the block. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:31, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for this, I will try my level best. United Blasters (talk) 07:57, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Checkuser data is not particularly useful here except to point out that this user is editing from the same general area of the world as previous socks. Note, though, this is probably what you'd expect, given the specific subject area they edit. --Yamla (talk) 11:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

You can check my Good faith edits, for improving Kerala Football Wikipedia articles. the location is coincidentally occurred. And that the similarity in editing topics. There is no connection with mentioned user/account. Take it seriously and take action faster as possible. United Blasters (talk) 10:13, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Pinging @Daniel Case, in case you missed this earlier. -- asilvering (talk) 21:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

OK. This, I recall, is one of a bevy of accounts that @Cenderabird: and I identified a few months ago as socks of Bobanfasil, who concentrated on Indian soccer articles. 331dot seems to agree that this was a valid call. Perhaps we should ask for a Checkuser? I would also like for Cenderabird to share here what they think are the relevant diffs, especially given the user's explanations/protestations above. Daniel Case (talk) 15:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Yamla's earlier comment said that CU data wasn't very useful in this case, though that was two months ago. -- asilvering (talk) 16:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

I don't know what account they were checking against, though (and they don't have to say, at least not publicly). Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Please recheck United Blasters (talk) 13:45, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Having looked over this again with fresh eyes, while I do see some patterns that could give pause (particularly the reverted edits at pages about media companies where other sockpuppet farms have been active), I'm not seeing a clear connection to Bobanfasil in particular. Daniel Case, 331dot, could you provide any further evidence to me via email? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:13, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

I have no other evidence, but I can't speak for 331. Daniel Case (talk) 17:15, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Acknowledging your message; I'll look at this later today. 331dot (talk) 17:47, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

I don't really know, why I got blocked. I just edited Indian sports articles. Which was also edited by an old bobanfasil, who has no connection with me😭 United Blasters (talk) 18:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Ok, having received an explanation from 331dot, I understand the original reasoning for the block based on behavioral similarity, but I think that the available evidence could also plausibly be only coincidental, and therefore am going to go ahead and unblock with both 331dot and Daniel Case's assent (which 331dot also noted in their email). _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

please take this problem seriously United Blasters (talk) 13:45, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Siby Mathai

Hello, United Blasters

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username CFA and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Siby Mathai, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 25 § Siby Mathai.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CFA}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

C F A 18:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eduport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBSE. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Xylem Learning

Hello United Blasters, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Xylem Learning, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xylem Learning.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ratnahastin}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

- Ratnahastin (talk) 01:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Eduport for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eduport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduport until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

B-Factor (talk) 09:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Xylem Learning logo.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xylem Learning logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 02:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eduport logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eduport logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

January 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at DD Malayalam, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 18:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to DD Malayalam. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 18:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Why did you changed new logo I uploaded? Is it looks like Promotion, that's cool United Blasters (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Waves (OTT) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waves (OTT) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waves (OTT) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bakhtar40 (talk) 10:07, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Help

UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Discussing this on IRC. If help is still required when that discussion concludes, feel free to restore the {{help me}}. Primefac (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Edit requests

Hello, I visited your website and noticed that you offer an option to request edits to Wikipedia articles. Could you please provide more details on how this works? I am particularly interested in understanding how you handle these requests and make edits on behalf of anonymous users. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:47, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Oh great, Thank you for Visiting. If they fill the form, eg: they want to improve article "JioHotstar". This data is transferred to me, as anonymous user want edit/Improve that article. Later, I will try myself to do that. 😊 UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 12:53, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Many new features, like about me, is coming.. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 12:54, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

I am curious about how you handle these requests while following Wikipedia's policies, like those on canvassing, conflicts of interest and verifiability. How do you make sure the edits stay neutral, well-sourced, and compliant, especially when they are made on behalf of anonymous users? – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:32, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Many requests are filtered by checking, how the edit helps the article, sources.

If the user suggests a good edit which may done (like grammer fix) , and requesting edits which have some issues with Wikipedia Policies are declined. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 13:37, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JioHotstar logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JioHotstar logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 17:31, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Facebook Outage AfD

I have reverted your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Facebook outage (2nd nomination). I expect keep will indeed be the result, but it is too soon to be closing that AfD. It was only opened today, and only has 4 !votes. An early consensus is often overturned after a couple of days at AfD, so I don't think we are in WP:SNOW territory yet, and in any case, you didn't cite that in your early close. Ordinarily AfDs must run for at least a week before closure. You might want to participate in AfDs a little more before closing any more, so as to get a feel for the process. Take care, and happy editing. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:15, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Oh got it bro, Greater Next time 😊✨🤝 UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 16:43, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 223.185.50.217 (talk) 17:34, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Star Vijay

See this. There is no consensus on the name change so please use the talk page per WP:ONUS. CNMall41 (talk) 03:57, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Waves OTT logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waves OTT logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Promoted as GODS of IndiGo fleet and Disney+ Hotstar

Congratulations!

You have been promoted as a god of Disney+ Hotstar.

Your co-editor or sockpuppet User:Arnav Bhate is promoted as god of IndiGo fleet. 106.216.200.155 (talk) 07:11, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

What? I told many times, You removed redirect many times. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 09:37, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

February 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Star Jalsha. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CNMall41 (talk) 02:34, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

I got it bro, but you also doing this🙄 UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 11:41, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Disruptive editing by IPs

Hello. Please, avoid reporting vandalism/disruptive IPs to WP:SPI. Requesting page protection at WP:RFPP or reporting vandalism to WP:AIV is generally better suited for that. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 19:36, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Got it, I'm New in this field, I have more to learn UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 15:45, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Deletion review for Ali Niknam

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ali Niknam. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Spokeoino (talk) 08:44, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Redirecting

Why did you create a redirect from Jolyon Jenkins? I dont find any relation. Warriorglance(talk to me) 06:41, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Oh sorry, I don't know why it happened, may be tool error UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 06:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

It seems this is part of a much larger muddle - see WP:ANI. PamD 07:45, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Same with this, which was deleted on the 6th but was today redirected to a totally unrelated article. Bridget (talk) 11:24, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

"Middle School Public Debate Program" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Middle School Public Debate Program has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 8 § Middle School Public Debate Program until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (talk) 15:44, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

I don't know why it happened, I just closed a deletion discussion, I think it's my tool error. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 15:53, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

AN/I discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Hi there, there's a discussion on AN/I about your AfD close and tool misfire. The section is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Niknam. REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 16:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

An advice...

Hi there, nice to meet you. I have seen the latest events that you made on the last day, especially with the closure of an article that provoked a DRV. May I give you a little bit of advice? If so, the advice would be to refrain from closing any more deletion discussion. First, you have an unusually low edit count for non admin closers, with a little bit over a thousand edits under your belt. Secondly, [I think] you do not have the judgment to decide on the outcome, since as you should note that closures aren't based on raw votes but rather on consensus. I see that you are an enthusiastic editor, but this is not the time for you to close discussions as you lack the required judgment and experience.

If you keep on doing so, and there are more problems with your closures, then the most likely scenario is that you might be topic banned from closing further discussions. It sounds painful, right? This indeed happened to me several months ago, after months of problematic closures. You may want to see the discussion that led to myself being topic banned, with links to problematic closures right there. You just do not want to end up just like me, right? Topic bans can be a burden to your editing history. Unfortunately, I am worse...

Hopefully, by following my advice, you will not face sanctions ahead of your history. If you have any questions, I will always be available to answer. Happy editing! ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi ToadetteEdit,

I really appreciate you reaching out and sharing your advice with me. Your personal experience adds a lot of clarity and makes your points resonate more.

I realize now that I acted too quickly in closing that AfD, and I understand the value of gaining more experience before making such decisions. I've already undone the close, and I'm dedicated to learning more about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, particularly concerning deletion discussions.

For now, I will hold off on closing any more AfDs and concentrate on building my experience in other areas. I’ll also check out the discussion you provided to better grasp the potential repercussions of errors in this field.

Thanks once again for your guidance. It’s incredibly helpful to receive advice from someone who has navigated this before.

Best regards, UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 02:55, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

JioStar

A lot of the additions of JioStar to pages have previously been reverted. Is there a discussion showing consensus for them to be re-added? CNMall41 (talk) 21:23, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for raising this. You're right that I should have discussed this first, especially since there have been previous reverts. I've now started a discussion on the talk page of Disney Star here: Talk:Disney Star#Proposed Change of Ownership from Disney Star to JioStar. I've provided some sources there, and I'd appreciate your input. I've also self-reverted my changes for now, pending the outcome of the discussion. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 03:06, 15 March 2025 (UTC)