User talk:MarioGom

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

hello

Hello, MarioGom. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

@MarioGom Thank you so much for your time, and have a great week =) Phoebezz22 (talk) 18:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gulf of America on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2025

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 Online events: New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search Suggestion: Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2025

Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Artists+Activists | Women of the Arab World Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: March editathons around the world Celebrate Women 2025 office hour series Tip of the month: You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing, and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks Moving the needle: 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) 23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Fabio Dias

Hello! No significant review happened in 2025 with that article because many other editors, including one admin, could not find anything to change in that article. WP:COMMONSENSE ? Contributor892z (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

I see. You offered goods to a previous paid editor for them to remove the tag for you or help your edit stick. Please, stop this non-sense. MarioGom (talk) 23:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Can you please just explain what is the purpose of repeatedly adding that tag? Nobody convinced me that anything valuable is being done here. The admin did not catch anything. Why do you say that what I am doing is non-sense? Contributor892z (talk) 23:08, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Contributor892z: Half of these sources are spam garbage. This is clearly a vanity page and does not seem to comply with notability criteria. This tag is meant to flag for a review of all these aspects in cases of undisclosed paid editing, which has happened here, as you confirmed. Either way, I'll nominate it for deletion, so the notability aspect can be clarified there. MarioGom (talk) 23:11, 1 March 2025 (UTC)