User talk:Queen of Hearts/Archive 12
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Queen of Hearts. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Huddersfield sex abuse ring on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
NPP Awards for 2024
|
The New Page Reviewer's NPP Barnstar Award | |
| This award is given in recognition to Queen of Hearts for conducting 173 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
Question from Di (they-them) (23:35, 15 January 2025)
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely)! charlotte 👸♥ 23:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)"America's Hitler" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect America's Hitler has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 16 § America's Hitler until a consensus is reached. BarntToust 22:29, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Darryl De Sousa
On 17 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Darryl De Sousa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Darryl De Sousa created a Baltimore Police Department unit to give lie detector tests to other units? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Darryl De Sousa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Darryl De Sousa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Launchballer 00:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Doug Hamlin
On 23 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Doug Hamlin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Doug Hamlin vowed to recruit more women and minorities to the National Rifle Association? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Doug Hamlin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Doug Hamlin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Recent revdel
You should probably revdel the edit summary too on this edit. mwwv converse∫edits 17:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Forgot to note this was
Done. charlotte 👸♥ 00:30, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
ITN revert
Thanks for reverting that inadvertent ITN protection of mine. While, I somewhat remember accidentally tapping some side panel protection link while on tablet, I don't remember pressing "save" and could swear I pressed "back". Embarrassing. Thanks again. —Bagumba (talk) 00:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Happens to the best of us, @Bagumba; there are much worse buttons you could've hit
charlotte 👸♥ 01:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
A pie for you!
|
Thank you for your new edit filter, 1338. I was looking for links to Gulf of America, but this is so much better :) win8x (talk) 21:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
- You're welcome, @win8x; hopefully the buzz around the EO will calm down soon, but never know in this world. charlotte 👸♥ 01:17, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gary Tuggle
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gary Tuggle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 05:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Your WikiCup submission: Talk:The Man Who Knew Too Much (Alexander McQueen collection)/GA1
Hi Queen of Hearts, thanks for participating in the WikiCup. You recently submitted Talk:The Man Who Knew Too Much (Alexander McQueen collection)/GA1 for GANR points in the WikiCup. Unfortunately, the review is not long enough; besides the standard GA criteria check and spot check, it seems you left only one minor comment about the sources. As per Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, such reviews are ineligible for points; you can only claim points for sufficiently detailed reviews. – Epicgenius (talk) 15:07, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gary Tuggle
The article Gary Tuggle you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gary Tuggle and Talk:Gary Tuggle/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gary Tuggle
The article Gary Tuggle you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Gary Tuggle for comments about the article, and Talk:Gary Tuggle/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 23:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Suggestion to filter 1338
On the filter's title, it says new users
so maybe we should limit the filter to only non-confirmed users? Also, should we need to set the filter to warn and tag (because most hits appear to be disruptive), we should first get consensus at the edit filter noticeboard. Thank you. Codename Noreste (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
"T:RFXR" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect T:RFXR has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 31 § T:RFXR until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:07, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Tamzin Hadasa Kelly RFD
Hello, you participated in an RFD discussion for Tamzin Hadasa Kelly, which redirects to the encyclopedia article Wikipedia administrators#Requests for adminship. However, several people (including me) misinterpreted it as a redirect to projectspace, it seemed like we couldn't have an accurate discussion, so I've closed the discussion and renominated it at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 2#Tamzin Hadasa Kelly. Please go there to participate again, and if your opinion at the first RFD still applies, please feel free to copy/paste your rationale from before. Nyttend (talk) 22:41, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Crabs for Christmas
On 3 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Crabs for Christmas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the writer of "Crabs for Christmas" joked that it contributed to Baltimore's population decline? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Crabs for Christmas. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Crabs for Christmas), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
January 2025 NPP backlog drive – Points award
|
The Invisible Barnstar | |
| This award is given in recognition to Queen of Hearts for accumulating at least 5 points during the January 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 16,000+ articles and 14,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 19,791.2 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |
GAR
Hi, could you please revert your recent GAR closes? The closing period was recently changed to a month. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:50, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29: Not sure how to feel about that, but I think I reverted everything. charlotte 👸♥ 19:16, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, and yeah, me neither. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29: - How does this new standard interact with seemingly uncontroversial keep closes? Are my closes at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Supermarine Spitfire/1 and Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pine Island Glacier/1 problematic? Surely a reassessment where all involved parties agree that it should be kept is exempt from the month, right? This would also apply to one of Q of H's vacated closes - Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ronnie Barker/1, although that articles does include a single citation to IMDB yet. Hog Farm Talk 04:58, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'd IAR, as I have done previously Hog Farm. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:41, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29: - How does this new standard interact with seemingly uncontroversial keep closes? Are my closes at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Supermarine Spitfire/1 and Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pine Island Glacier/1 problematic? Surely a reassessment where all involved parties agree that it should be kept is exempt from the month, right? This would also apply to one of Q of H's vacated closes - Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ronnie Barker/1, although that articles does include a single citation to IMDB yet. Hog Farm Talk 04:58, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, and yeah, me neither. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Republican Party (United States) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
Gorbachev GAR
I've cut Gorbachev down to 11,500 words from a rather long 17,000. Hope that meets your concerns. It'd be appreciated if you could say what you now think on the GAR page. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Didn't manage to comment before closure but fyi, I don't have any objections to the GAR being closed as keep. I give @Chiswick Chap for going through and fixing and shortening up the article, and doing "my job" of summarising the Leader of the Soviet Union section. All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Ughhh.... What did I do wrong this time?) 08:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Benjamin Schreiber (criminal)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Benjamin Schreiber (criminal) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MolecularPilot -- MolecularPilot (talk) 05:24, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Thanks!
|
The Happy Doogs Award |
| Thanks for the help! In fact 54,129 thank yous :) Fortuna, Imperatrix Mundi 11:52, 15 February 2025 (UTC) |
- You're welcome, Fortuna imperatrix mundi! charlotte 👸♥ 14:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Queen of Hearts, it has been two days short of five months since you last posted to your review of this GA nomination, and you haven't responded to multiple queries there about the status of your review, despite significant editing activity elsewhere.
On February 21, it will have been a full five months. If you haven't responded by then with your plans—if you haven't edited on Wikipedia in the interim, I will naturally wait until you have edited so you have a chance to respond—I will request a second opinion in the hopes of getting a reviewer to finish up the review. Thank you for your attention to this and your understanding. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, BlueMoonset – I'm surprised this hasn't already happened, please do so. For the record, I'm pretty sure it just needs a spotcheck. charlotte 👸♥ 14:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
NPP
Hi. Did you intend to give this user the NPP flag along with their PCR? They raised a query because they didn't apply for it and did not know what Page Curation was. They know what to do now and will probably (hopefully) use it once they have read the instructions. I might even give them some training if I have time. NPP has a very steep learning curve and not all good AfC reviewers are aware of it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:41, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Kudpung, apologies for the late reply. I trust that Qcne's AfC experience will translate into NPP, although I will admit that me granting him NPP without tilling him anything about it was subpar. charlotte 👸♥ 14:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- No worries. Because it requires a near admin level of notability and deletion policies the right is generally only accorded at WP:PERM (like other requests for user rights) after a thorough vetting, and a proven track record and need for the extra tools. In the first instance, NPP is usually granted on probation for 30 days. If you haven't already done so, do check out the PERM requests, it often gets backlogged and coulddo with some help. Take care, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:37, 21 February 2025 (UTC)