Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pine Island Glacier/1

Pine Island Glacier

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Kept. Hog Farm _Talk 00:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are uncited sections, particularily entire paragraphs in the "History of fieldwork" section. The "History of fieldwork" needs to be updated, as it currently stops at 2012. Z1720 (talk) 16:06, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is an important topic: I'll take a look at it. — hike395 (talk) 20:46, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Field work on the ice and in the ocean next to the ice seems to have tailed off around 2014 (I cannot find sources past that). It appears that aerial surveys and satellites are now the dominant data sources. I've added a new subsection about those, to round out the history. I've also trimmed back the unsourced trivia in the section.

Still working on the overall article. As usual, marking sentences with {{cn}} would be helpful for me. — hike395 (talk) 05:58, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hike395: My citation concerns seem to have been resolved. Z1720 (talk) 15:34, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! What I've done is reorganize the sections to be parallel to the Thwaites Glacier GA, added newer references throughout, cleaned up the lede to reflect the rest of the article, and change the image choice to support the material in the article. I think we're now back to GA-level quality. — hike395 (talk) 16:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No further concerns. Z1720 (talk) 21:11, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.