Talk:The World's Biggest Gang Bang III – The Houston 620

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from The World's Biggest Gang Bang III – The Houston 620 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 May 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that The World's Biggest Gang Bang III was so popular that it crashed the server?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2025/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The World's Biggest Gang Bang III – The Houston 620.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kingsif talk 00:59, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

~~... that the participants in "The World's Biggest Gang Bang III" were asked to follow seven rules?~~
- ALT1: ... that the participants in "The World's Biggest Gang Bang III" were once described as "the professional, the hopeless and the hopeful"?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Nien-Hsi Yang

Converted from a redirect by Launchballer (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 280 past nominations.

Laun chba ller 10:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Both hook facts are in the article; ALT1 is AGF because I can't get past the paywall. I have to say, the hook got me to review. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 19:55, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To any promoter who's looking towards this: make sure you're fine with controversy. I'm noping out for that reason. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:23, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AirshipJungleman29: Is it just the subject matter or is there something I need to fix?--Laun chba ller 13:15, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The former. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:16, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unpromoted per WT:DYK#Porn hook RoySmith (talk) 11:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith: Why did you reject the nomination outright rather than give it a question mark tick for further discussion? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:20, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seemed to reflect the consensus at WT:DYK, but if somebody thinks this can be salvaged, I won't object, so adding

. RoySmith (talk) 12:24, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of retranscluding this at T:TDYK. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I saw two yeses, one yes-with-a-different-hook, one not-for-me-but-DYK-is-not-censored, and the original poster, whose last comment was "keep working on the hook". That's a loose consensus to run at least the nomination, if not the hook. There is a second hook in this already (ALT1) but I can also suggest:

ALT2: ... that The World's Biggest Gang Bang III was the "Top Selling Release" of 1999?

ALT3: ... that Houston underwent labiaplasty after filming The World's Biggest Gang Bang III – The Houston 620?

ALT4: ... that preparation for The World's Biggest Gang Bang III involved "a lot of running and a lot of dildos"?--Laun chba ller 13:05, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ALT5: ... that The World's Biggest Gang Bang III has been compared to "watch[ing] 47 football games on the weekend"?--Laun chba ller 13:47, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I struck the ones recently removed from the article.--Laun chba ller 05:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above just rotated off WT:DYK and is now at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 205#Porn hook. I suggest one further hook – ALT6: ... that The World's Biggest Gang Bang III was so popular it crashed the server? – and request another reviewer.--Laun chba ller 14:47, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer:

New reviewer for this DYK. I'm a bit concerned about the source, since the source used will to describe the server being broken, implying that the server did not crash by the time this article was written. Is there any stronger source to back up the hook? Other than the sourcing, the hook is short and interesting enough. Sammi Brie has assessed the article's quality and mainpage feasability, and my checks seem to align with hers. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 03:12, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article was set in February but published in August. This doesn't seem like a prediction or a warning, I think they can be sure it happened.--Laun chba ller 07:35, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeromi Mikhael: Has your concern been resolved?--Laun chba ller 14:44, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer: Deep inside I feel that something's still a bit off, but for the sake of DYK I'll

AGF on your interpretation. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 16:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeromi Mikhael and Launchballer: For clarity, which hooks are approved here? Kingsif (talk) 00:43, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsif: I believe it's ALT6 that we're talking here. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 00:46, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question

It's the third in a series and still this article addresses not how big a gang bang can possibly get before it turns into a full blown orgy.2600:6C52:69F0:8F80:5491:5282:5BAA:ADC7 (talk) 04:15, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]