Talk:Edmonds' Clock Tower

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Edmonds' Clock Tower was split in two after the June 2011 Christchurch earthquakes?

Source: https://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/7248935/Edmonds-clock-tower-to-be-repaired

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Roblox

Moved to mainspace by Panamitsu (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 72 past nominations.

―Panamitsu (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

I will review this one. Hog Farm _talk 02:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Some WP:LIMITED stuff like "foundation stone on 26 September 1929" but I think that's limited enough (and facts, not original ideas) that we're in the clear. Hog Farm _talk 02:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]