Jump to content

Talk:Alejandro Finisterre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Outdated Biography

[edit]

2019 marked the centenary of his birth and more information about his work and life was published.

A well-documented biography was published in Adiante Diario: "foosball-in-the-ano-del-centenario-de-su-natalicio.html Alejandro Finisterre: the untold story of the genius of foosball, in the year of the centenary of his birth".

It would be interesting to incorporate his data into this article.

Greetings, 88.3.75.155 (talk) 22:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by LunaEclipse talk 09:05, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait of Finisterre by Eulogia Merle
Portrait of Finisterre by Eulogia Merle
  • Source: Eaude, Michael (2007-02-25). "Alejandro Finisterre". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2025-04-09.
Created by Grnrchst (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 54 past nominations.

Grnrchst (talk) 12:55, 10 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: That's...interesting. Article looks good and the image appears to be usable. Looks good to go. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Image

[edit]

Seeing as the subject is dead, would it be apt to use a fair use photograph of him? The current illustration is obviously a more artistic interpretation rather than a lifelike portrait. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 01:44, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It would fail WP:NFCC. (CC) Tbhotch 06:50, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure about that. The illustration doesn't really provide an accurate depiction of the subject IMO. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 12:32, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]