Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2025 April 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< April 17 << Mar | April | May >> April 19 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 18

[edit]

04:13, 18 April 2025 review of submission by Krshna4sri

[edit]

Could you Please tell me why it was rejected Krshna4sri (talk) 04:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Krshna4sri: Draft:CR Srikanth was declined (not 'rejected') earlier, and I've just declined it again, because of referencing. You need to cite reliable sources to support the information, and they need to be cited inline, not merely piled in a heap at the end. It must be much clearer which source supports what information, and we also need to see that the information is sufficiently supported throughout. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Wikipedia team and editors,
First, thank you for the incredible work you do in keeping Wikipedia the free and reliable knowledge base it is. I’ve been a long-time supporter and donor of this platform, and I’ve always appreciated the spirit of open, verified, and shared knowledge that this community represents.
This is the first time I’ve ever submitted anything on my own behalf. I’ve spent months creating and improving my music and composition portfolio, and I’ve now received verified global airplay, classical music publications on IMSLP, and over 40 third-party press features — all carefully cited and formatted in this article.
I fully understand and respect Wikipedia’s standards. I’ve worked hard to ensure the article is written neutrally, supported by inline references, and meets the notability requirements for contemporary musicians. It would mean the world to me if you could please consider re-reviewing this with fresh eyes. No favors expected — just fairness and clarity in light of the evidence provided.
With sincere gratitude for your time and for the mission you serve,
CR Srikanth Krshna4sri (talk) 12:18, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your own website, Spotify, Soundcloud, YouTube, x.com and assorted blogs are NOT suitable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 12:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please advise where to remove ? I can remove and resubmit is that in external links?? if it is references then its not mine its the bloggers Krshna4sri (talk) 12:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You have 63 largely useless sources, pick the three you feel have the most significant coverage of you. No reviewer is going to trawl through your enormous list looking for them! Theroadislong (talk) 16:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I made a clean version but it was rejected . thanks for your wonderful support .. Its unfortunate that I desired for it though I have some valuable blogs and Valubale certifications no use .. My continous donations to wiki went on vain
== CR Srikanth ==
CR Srikanth is an Indian-American composer and music producer whose work blends classical orchestration with ambient and electronic pop elements. He is the creator of a hybrid genre known as VS Pop (Very Smooth Pop), described as a fusion of cinematic composition and contemporary pop.[1]
=== Background ===
Srikanth studied Music Composition for Film and Television through Berklee Online, completing coursework in orchestration and scoring.[2]
=== Musical Style ===
Srikanth's compositional approach incorporates modal harmony, minimalism, and orchestral layering. His classical catalog includes symphonies, string quartets, and solo piano works published on the International Music Score Library Project (IMSLP).[3]
In the electronic-pop space, he releases music under the VS Pop label. His singles, including "Better Days" and "I Need This Love", have received favorable reviews from independent music blogs for their melodic fusion of ambient textures and pop production.[4][5]
=== Reception ===
Srikanth was named one of the "Artists to Watch" for 2025 by Music By Humans, a digital magazine that highlighted his genre-crossing versatility and cinematic sound.[6]
=== Selected Works ===
==== Classical ====
  • Pi Symphony, Op.1
  • Hope Symphony, Op.2
  • String Quartet in C minor, Op.7 No.3
==== Contemporary (VS Pop) ====
  • "Better Days"
  • "I Need This Love"
  • "No Way"
  • "Far Away from Home"
== External Links ==
== References ==
  1. ^ "CR: El compositor moderno que revoluciona la música clásica con tecnología y fusión". Frecuencia Alternativa. Retrieved 18 April 2025.
  2. ^ "Berklee Online". Retrieved 18 April 2025.
  3. ^ "CR Srikanth Scores". IMSLP. Retrieved 18 April 2025.
  4. ^ "CR Srikanth e sua sonoridade envolvente de electro-pop em Better Days". Music For All. Retrieved 18 April 2025.
  5. ^ "Better Days: CR Srikanth eleva o indie pop com um hino de esperança e energia". Roadie Music. Retrieved 18 April 2025.
  6. ^ "Artists to Watch 2025". Music By Humans. Retrieved 18 April 2025.

    7. Krshna4sri (talk) 16:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    04:54, 18 April 2025 review of submission by 110.38.229.3

    [edit]

    Kindly guide me about it how to make it eligible for the Wiki to be publish on it. or any one help me edit this 110.38.229.3 (talk) 04:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Wynk Music Online has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:27, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    05:19, 18 April 2025 review of submission by TrishaMaria

    [edit]

    I'm writing about a comic artist based in India. My draft submission was declined because of neutrality and lack of enough reliable sources. I've tried to fix the tone to be neutral, as much as i can but i'm not sure. Since he is not very famous, there is very little information available online that isnt original research. Please help me find more reliable sources on this topic- Tadam gyadu: marvel artist (biography). TrishaMaria (talk) 05:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @TrishaMaria: no, the onus is on you to find the necessary sources, we don't get involved in that.
    Sources don't have to be online, as long as they otherwise meet our reliability etc. requirements. If you're citing offline sources, see WP:OFFLINE for advice. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    09:05, 18 April 2025 review of submission by 78.62.166.101

    [edit]

    As this site has recently been implicated in the 4chan hack, and thus covered by several mainstream media outlets, it now meets the criteria for notability, right? I also noticed that there is a soyjak.party article on the Russian version of Wikipedia. Why the discrepancy? Does it come down to different moderators? 78.62.166.101 (talk) 09:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Each language version of Wikipedia is a separate project, with their own editors and policies(and, as you note, different administrators). What is acceptable on one version is not necessarily acceptable on another. Given that access to Wikipedia is restricted in Russia right now, the number of participants there is probably less. 331dot (talk) 09:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That's what I figured. As far as notability is concerned, the sources I've added do not necessarily just mention the subject in passing, they expound upon its central involvement in the hack. However, any sources referencing the subject are largely in the context of the hack, and not necessarily about the site itself. Nonetheless, I believe it consitutes notability at this point. I notice that the draft has been rejected multiple times, so I wonder if it will finally be approved with this newfound exposure. 78.62.166.101 (talk) 09:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    11:21, 18 April 2025 review of submission by Kevfas

    [edit]

    i have no conflicts of interest.

    what is more, about sources: There are no better online sources as it's an old ammunition rifle ammunition/caliber with owners only in central EU. Only "paper" books Kevfas (talk) 11:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    If you have no conflict of interest, why did you declare one? 331dot (talk) 12:33, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    13:08, 18 April 2025 review of submission by 92.154.12.75

    [edit]

    We have submitted the Gilles Lorin article but we don't understand the reason for the refusal. In fact, the content was written by an author and we have supplemented the elements with reliable sources as indicated in the best practices. Can you please tell us more precisely what's wrong? 92.154.12.75 (talk) 13:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    From what I can see, not enough references are present in the draft to conclude that subject is notable for a Wikipedia article, in particular as a creative professional. To fully assess the notability of the subject, more references should be added if possible, specially those that are secondary and independent. For example, the fifth reference in the draft is an interview with the subject of the draft itself, thus doesn't count as independent. If you don't find more reliable sources that talk about the subject in detail, then it isn't notable yet, and I'm sorry to say that the best prose in the world can't supply for that. Usually the best course of action is wait for the subject to become notable (or contribute to its notability outside Wikipedia).
    I hope I have answered your questions, don't be discouraged! If you still have any doubts, reply me back. NeoGaze (talk) 22:24, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    14:13, 18 April 2025 review of submission by Uzimmermann25

    [edit]

    Hi! I’ve revised and resubmitted Draft:Maya Feller with expanded independent sourcing and formatting. However, after updating the {{AfC submission}} template with |r| and ts=now, the draft still shows a blue box and is not appearing in the review queue. I also attempted a reset using {{AfC submission|||ts=20250418141302|u=Uzimmermann25|ns=4}}, but after editing again, it reverted to blue and displays a malformed category timestamp at the bottom of the page.

    Could someone please take a look and manually requeue this for review?

    Thanks so much! Uzimmermann25 (talk) 14:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I've suppressed the function of the templates, you inadvertently submitted this page for review. 331dot (talk) 15:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    14:30, 18 April 2025 review of submission by Brian 411

    [edit]

    Hi all! Could anyone please advise, if this draft contains correct inline citations? Thank you. Brian 411 (talk) 14:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Brian 411: Ref 8 and Ref 10 seem to be missing editions (I presume it is a periodical). All the ŠAŽ-PLM-labeled sources are missing page numbers, 8 and 10 included. Ref 21 could do with an actual link to the web page you're citing. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! Brian 411 (talk) 17:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    15:57, 18 April 2025 review of submission by Krshna4sri

    [edit]

    Can you Please tell me why it was rejected Krshna4sri (talk) 15:57, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Krshna4sri: Because you spammed it, resubmitting without addressing the reviewers' concerns. Refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode:
    None of the sources you presently cite are usable, let alone help for eligibility. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    And looking at the sources on this version, none of them are any good either:
    Still nothing usable. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    should have same attitude while accepting donations from me . I gave genune sources if it doesnt qualify then it should be clearly mentioned not with such silly messages becuase you have spammed etc Krshna4sri (talk) 16:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Krshna4sri: You submitted the draft six times in the span of 14 hours; that is textbook spam. Your donations do not permit you to force content that violates Wikipedia policies and guidelines onto us, and in fact us editors have absolutely nothing to do with the Wikimedia Foundation's (ab)use of donations - we're all volunteers who don't see a red cent from them. What is your connexion to Srikanth? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:25, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Ideally we would have avoided spamming if you told me at the beginning itself . It’s a process of collection and resubmitting while you call it as spamming which really hurts me . I am not a spammer Krshna4sri (talk) 16:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Krshna4sri: What is your connexion to Srikanth? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Why do you need that ? What if I say it’s me ? Krshna4sri (talk) 17:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Because we have rules specifically around paid editing and conflict-of-interest, and the persistence here leads me to think one or both apply. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:22, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I just came to know that it’s COI . So dropping off from self promotion thanks for sharing the info . Krshna4sri (talk) 17:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    17:08, 18 April 2025 review of submission by Khutijabegum7

    [edit]

    Hello, I’ve recently resubmitted Draft:Mohammed Rahim Khan with coverage from major media outlets (TOI, Indian Express, Siasat, etc.) and parliamentary documentation. Would appreciate an early review if possible. Thank you! Khutijabegum7 (talk) 17:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Khutijabegum7 you have submitted and will be reviewed at some point. With the current backlog, it could take up to 3 months. We do not do reviews on request. S0091 (talk) 17:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    17:22, 18 April 2025 review of submission by 102.89.69.152

    [edit]

    What can I do to make this draft accepted? It's not promotional, but an independent collation of relevant facts on the book.

    Looking forward to your response, Thank you! 

    102.89.69.152 (talk) 17:22, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Nothing. The topic is not notable not to mention every editor who has contributed to the draft has been either a sock and/or WP:UPE which is a violation of the WP:Terms of Use. S0091 (talk) 17:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    21:20, 18 April 2025 review of submission by Mohunidze

    [edit]

    Hello! I’ve created a draft article about Ukrainian actress Yelyzaveta Vasylenko at User:Mohunudze and submitted it using

    However, I do not have the permission to move it to Draft space myself. I kindly request that it be moved to Draft:Yelyzaveta Vasylenko so that it can be properly reviewed under the Articles for Creation process.

    Thank you very much! 

    Mohunidze (talk) 21:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mohunidze  Done. S0091 (talk) 21:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    22:27, 18 April 2025 review of submission by Charelivs

    [edit]

    Hello, I have just resubmitted my draft hoping for approval. It was declined previously because the horse wasn't considered notable with the small amount of information, as it was kind of half finished. I really hope it will get approved but then again I'm not sure, can anyone give me advice on getting it approved? I believe the horse should be considered notable with grade 1 wins at Cheltenham and international placing. Also, my first language isn't English, it's Irish so please inform me if there are any grammar mistakes haha. Thank you! Charelivs (talk) 22:27, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    As you have submitted it for review, the reviewer will leave you feedback if not accepted. 331dot (talk) 22:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    23:13, 18 April 2025 review of submission by Louis Bara Jr

    [edit]

    Why was my article declined? Louis Bara Jr (talk) 23:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Louis Bara Jr I fixed your header to provide a link to your draft as intended. Did you see the messages left by the reviewer? 331dot (talk) 23:27, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2025_April_18&oldid=1287117342"