Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 March 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 17
March 19 >

March 18

[edit]

Template:Country data Vijayanagara Empire

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to the creator of this flag, "This is not the official Vijayanagara flag, but a modern imagination of what the flag used by Vijayanagara would look like. It has no historical background (no historical information on the shade or hue of the color, the angle of lines, the curvature or straightness of lines, etc). No flag artifact or any archaeological proof of a flag used by Vijayanagara survived."

Therefore this template should be deleted, as it promotes a flag that the creator clearly stated as fictional. This flag and all others like it has already misled many into believing that it was real and was used by the empire, when it wasn't. We should get it deleted it as soon as possible to prevent anymore people from being misled like this. AlvaKedak (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Country data Kakatiya dynasty

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This flag wasn't used by the Kakatiyas. The creator of the flag has stated that it is unreferenced, meaning it's most likely fictional. There are no records of such a flag being flown by the Dynasty either. Therefore this template should be deleted as it promotes an unsourced fictitious flag, which may mislead readers into believing that this flag was actually used by the dynasty. AlvaKedak (talk) 19:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NWA Anarchy

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No main article for the template. A small local promotion. The template includes just a title and a few wrestlers who worked there. Not everything needs a template HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:43, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Smile (film series)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Parker Finn. ✗plicit 23:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Smile (film series) with Template:Parker Finn.
Substantial duplication, the same three films mentioned on both navboxes. --woodensuperman 14:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge the Parker Finn navbox into the Smile navbox. I think the latter template is more relevant to linking these three articles together, given that they're all part of the same franchise. AHI-3000 (talk) 19:04, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Except per WP:PERFNAV, Parker Finn wouldn't be appropriate in the Smile navbox. Best to do it the other way around to include all the links. --woodensuperman 20:08, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I never said anything about adding a link to Parker Finn in the Smile navbox. AHI-3000 (talk) 20:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A merge in the direction you are suggesting would imply that, otherwise it's a simple "delete". --woodensuperman 08:45, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Courage the Cowardly Dog

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:31, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Three articles, already well linked. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 11:09, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, is there really any rule about minimum number of pages for a navbox? What you linked to is not even an official rule or a real policy, just an essay with a subjective opinion. AHI-3000 (talk) 19:09, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I've just realised this should be a speedy delete as was previously deleted. --woodensuperman 22:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
G4 definitely doesn't apply—the page deleted in 2011 can't remotely be considered "substantially identical". ‑ Iridescent 05:14, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, is something that happened 14 years ago even still relevant to the present situation? I don't think so. AHI-3000 (talk) 06:04, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What was different? --woodensuperman 06:37, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Everything except the name. This was a blatant mistagging for G4, quite aside from the obvious issue that a 2011 discussion is unlikely to be relevant. ‑ Iridescent 2 08:09, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So what links were included then? It's difficult to know it was a mistagging (and unfair to chastise me) when I can't see the previous version. And actually, the reasons for deletion are still identical. Three links then, three links now. I can't see how substantially different it can be with so few links. Does not meet the threshold of WP:NENAN in either case. See this discussion. --woodensuperman 08:44, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2023 Tailteann Cup Team of the Year

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN The Banner talk 01:38, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 04:43, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Should be deleted as not an actual team. Vestrian24Bio 04:54, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2025_March_18&oldid=1283777637"