Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jim McGovern (American politician)/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:12, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
There is uncited prose throughout the article. The article has too many small sections, some of which are only a sentence long. This doesn't follow criteria 2 regarding the article layout. (MOS:PARA) I also do not think the article meets WP:NPOV. It seems like this article is written to highlight the politician's adherance to popular Democratic policies in 2025. I think most of the prose about their political career needs to be removed, while his most important initiatives (not just votes on issues) are highlighted. Z1720 (talk) 15:26, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- This does stink of editors seeing news articles and adding quick 1 sentence mentions in an unorganized form, resulting in the plethora of small sections. Part of the GA criteria is organization, as Z1720 describes in the nomination. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:46, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- Fail I agree with Z1720. Highlighting important initiatives should be done more neutrally than the current article does. Ex. Stating that “McGovern is known as a leading voice on ending hunger and food insecurity” with only one source violates criterion 2 and 4. McGovern might well be a leading voice on the matter, but one source cannot verify this potentially contentious claim. Compass128 (talk) 19:07, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.