Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Small Faces discography/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 16 May 2025 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Small Faces discography

[edit]

Small Faces discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): VirreFriberg (talk) 16:15, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because... the article recently received a rewrite and the Small Faces deserve more widespread attention. VirreFriberg (talk) 16:15, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042

[edit]

Comments

[edit]
  • "became the eleventh best selling recording artist" => "became the eleventh best-selling recording artist"
  • "and has thus have been referred to" => "and have thus been referred to"
  • "The Small Faces achieved success" - earlier you referred to them as just "Small Faces", without the article. I personally think the "the" should be there throughout.
  • "The Small Faces debut album and eight first singles" => "The Small Faces' debut album and first eight singles"
  • "the Small Faces relationship with Arden" => "the Small Face's relationship with Arden"
  • "told the band members parents" => "told the band members' parents"
  • "signed the band to his label in February 1967" => "signed the band in February 1967" (the subject is the label, so "his" doesn't work)
  • "The Small Faces music has been " => "The Small Faces' music has been "
  • "which contained both material the band had released on Decca and Immediate" => "which contained material the band had released on both Decca and Immediate"
  • "notable exceptions to this rule is the 2003 compilation album" => "a notable exception to this rule is the 2003 compilation album"
  • "Ultimate Collection, released on Sanctuary Records which" => "Ultimate Collection, released on Sanctuary Records, which"
  • "Archival release, recorded live in Mouscron, Belgium on 9 January 1966." - not a sentence so should not have a full stop
  • All three notes under compilations should not have full stops
  • Notes E and F under singles are identical so can be merged
  • Notes G, K and L under singles should not have full stops
  • The quote in note J under singles is missing its closing quote mark
  • I would put the footnotes above the references and in their own section
  • I haven't done a source review, but refs 18 and 22 are giving me Harv errors as you have the author names the wrong way round in the {{sfn}} template in the first instance and the publication year missing in the second
  • That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude! I've fixed the outlined issues! Sorry for the late response, I forgot I had nominated the article... VirreFriberg (talk) 21:52, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source Review

[edit]
  • Ref 10 uses slash dates and not DMY like the rest of the page
  • A few MOS:DASH issues
  • Why is there two groups of footnotes?
  • Inst AllMusic user generated and therefore relaibel?
  • "Their first single on their new label will be released on June 2" should be "2 June" as the page is DMY
  • Spot checks turned up nothing
  • Linking is consistent
That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 20:01, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @VirreFriberg for follow up. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @OlifanofmrTennant! I've revided the article per these suggestions. I have a few points to make:
- Changed ref 10
- Which part of the article fails MOS:DASH?
- Footnotes merged into one category
- Per the AllMusic source, Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources states that the reviews/biographies are reliable. Summaries are not, though I don't know what the "summary" is in an AllMusic article since it's not explicitly stated
- "Their first single on their new label will be released on June 2" is a quote directly taken from an article in the source magazine. According to the MOS: Dates and numbers, you're not supposed to change the format of a direct quotation.
Otherwise, thank you for taking your time in reading the article. VirreFriberg (talk) 13:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve taken care of the dash issues. Support Olliefant (she/her) 14:00, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

[edit]
  • Compilation albums table is missing a screen reader only title
  • I fixed a scope that was listed as rowgroup instead of row
  • Accessibility is good, minus the missing title
  • References are consistently formatted and linked where appropriate
  • Images has appropriate alt text

Other than that, the references appear consistently formatted and accessibility is good. Please ping me when you reply. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @VirreFriberg for follow up. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Hey man im josh; Added the screen-reader title for the compilation album section! Thanks for the ping! 22:29, 13 May 2025 (UTC) VirreFriberg (talk) 22:29, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Small_Faces_discography/archive1&oldid=1290627915"