Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of The Sarah Jane Adventures serials/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 3 May 2025 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of The Sarah Jane Adventures serials (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:54, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm back with another Doctor Who-related episode list. This one for The Sarah Jane Adventures, a spin-off series featuring a former companion of the Doctor and targeted towards children. This entire lead was practically unsourced, and those in the remainder of the list were poor. I've spent the last 48 hours cleaning everything up and bringing it to FL standards which has lead me here. Thanks in advance for any review! TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:54, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Drive by comment
[edit]- BBC stands for British Broadcasting Corporation, not Broadcast
- Back to do the rest later -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:54, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed the DBC, thanks. TheDoctorWho (talk) 16:34, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Olifant
[edit]- “ former time-travelling companion of The Doctor portrayed by Elisabeth Sladen.” Wording seems to imply that Sladen portrayed the Doctor
- Since “comic relief” is a term may be worth explaining what the “Comic Relief” charity is
- Mention that Sarah Jane originated in the 70s
- Mention the previous attempt to make a Sarah Jane spin off with K9 and Company
- EFNs B C and D have two periods at the end
- Under see also why is only the Doctor Who 2005- present list included and not the 1969-1989 one? If either were to be included I would have the latter as Sarah Jane originated in those episodes
- That’s what I found pi n me when done Olliefant (she/her) 14:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @OlifanofmrTennant: Thank you for the review. I originally only included the '05-pres. list since it's considered a spinoff of the revived series, but since we're not hurting or space I added the other one. Everything else has been addressed. TheDoctorWho (talk) 16:34, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]- "returned to the programme several times prior to the spin-off, then-most recently in the 2006 episode "School Reunion"" - aside from reading a little oddly, I don't think "then-most recently" works here, as at this point you have not stated that SJA started in 2007. Is there another way to word this? Maybe just note that it was her first appearance in NuWho....?
- "A full fifth and sixth series were commissioned" - I don't think "a full" works here, as you are referring to two different series. Maybe "The fifth and sixth series were commissioned"
- "however, Sladen died after only six of the intended twelve episodes had been recorded." - specify that this is 6 of 12 of the sixth series, as the first half of the sentence refers to two different series
- In footnote s, the word "special" is mis-spelt as "pecial".
- That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:40, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Done, thanks for the review! TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:32, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Medxvo
[edit]- "companion of The Doctor" - ".... the Doctor"?
- "neighbour Maria Jackson and friend Clyde Langer" - I believe a comma can be added after "Jackson" for consistency with other similar incidents
- "The first serial Revenge of the Slitheen premiered" - "The first serial, Revenge of the Slitheen, premiered"?
I think that's all, great work! Medxvo (talk) 20:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Medxvo: fixed all three, thanks! TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:03, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Medxvo (talk) 09:26, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
History6042
[edit]The image at the top should have a caption.
- It should also have alt text.
- Tables need captions.
- They should also have row and column scopes.
- Is it possible to not have the white squares around table references?
- When rows are the same they can be merged. An example being Written by, Phil Ford, Series 2.
- In the graph, color shouldn't purely be used to differentiate per WP:COLOR.
- All sources should be archived.
- Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:03, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @History6042: This review perplexes me a little, because nearly everything was done prior to this review. For example, the image already has alt text, and the tables already have captions. The white squares around the references are for accessibility reasons where needed, because the color of the reference is too similar to the color of the table. Cells cannot be merged across multiple instances of {{Episode list}}, but even if they could I feel that it would be a time that it's not useful. The graph below the table handles differentiation by providing the exact same information in a separate format, without the need to visualize color. All that said, I have, however, just added archives to the remaining sources, where possible. TheDoctorWho (talk) 17:34, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, sorry about the image, I was checking in visual editor and the image wouldn't let me click on it to see alt text. Otherwise, I support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 17:37, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey man im josh
[edit]Source review: Passed
- Reliable enough for the information being cited
- Consistent date formatting
- Consistent and proper reference formatting
- Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
- Spot checks on 15 sources match what they are being cited for
Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:35, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:53, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.