Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Ithaca discography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Ithaca discography

Featured list candidates/Ithaca discography/archive1

Nominator(s): Chchcheckit (talk) 17:38, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because... might be speedrunning fr here. Ithaca are gonna disband in August 2025, making their discography complete/unchanging after that point. I feel I've got everything down here. Also: am working on both studio album articles for yet another good topic. Thanks. Chchcheckit (talk) 17:38, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"Ithaca recorded its debut album" => "Ithaca recorded their debut album" per UK English
"for a compilation organized" => "for a compilation organised" per UK English
"In 2025, Ithica plans" => "In 2025, Ithica plan" per UK English
That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:43, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude Done // Chchcheckit (talk) 18:53, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:24, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Royiswariii

Image review

File:20231007 ithaca.jpg - Own work - Passed

Have an alt text - Passed

Rename the file on commons "File:Ithaca performing live.jpg to be more appropriate file name.
Change the "Ref." to "Ref(s)."

If done, please ping me. ROY is WAR Talk! 13:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Ithaca performing live" is the alt text. I should do better.
Reference(s) multi set to yes

// Chchcheckit (talk) 22:21, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Royiswariii I have suggested on commons the name be changed to "Ithaca Aftershock Festival 2023". I think I have done all you have said. // Chchcheckit (talk) 19:42, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support. ROY is WAR Talk! 01:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vestrian24Bio

Refs 16 & 22 - duplicated citations.
Aren't there news coverage for youtube sources.
The page is missing article description, should at least have a {{short description|none}} template.
Specify a language variant.

Vestrian24Bio 13:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vestrian24Bio:

done
For the music videos: there are (for 6/7 of them, excluding "otherworldly": appears on metalsucks albeit not really?), but most do not include a director/film credit. hence. plus they get their own coverage in the album articles?
done?
done

// Chchcheckit (talk) 22:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No need to specify border="1" in tables.
No need to boldface header texts as they're bolded by default.
Studio albums caption should be, "List of studio albums, with selected chart positions".
EPs table captions should be just "List of extended plays".
Singles caption should be "List of singles, showing associated albums".
MV caption should be "List of music videos, with directors, along with albums".
"Hold Fast Hope" is linked to a redirect to Vheissu.
<references /> could be replaced with {{reflist}} template and <references group="upper-alpha" responsive="1"></references> could be replaced with {{notelist-ua}}

Vestrian24Bio 13:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vestrian24Bio Done all. // Chchcheckit (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Vestrian24Bio 02:59, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source review from TheDoctorWho

I see a few comments have been made above, but figure I'd give this a proper source review:

Does "Anon" in ref 2 stand for "anonymous"? If so, this should be removed. If no author is listed it should just be blank.
What makes The Midlands Rocks a reliable source? It's about page refers to it as a WP:BLOG and seems to imply that you can write for them just by filling out their contact form, suggesting poor editorial standards.
Metal Injection is italicized in ref 14, but not ref 13, it should be consistent in either format
Ref 18 actually has a listed author that needs added
Ref 19: wikilink YouTube
Similar to the above, Anon should be removed from 21
The title in ref 27 isn't italicized while the rest of the YouTube titles are, again this should be consistent
- "OFFICIAL VIDEO" in this ref should be changed to "Official Video"
I see that a number of references switch between sentence and title case. This should also be consistent. I'd like to suggest that you run this script to help with that.
Spot checked references 1, 7, 12, 13, 14, 18, 22, and 28; mostly everything checks out except for the two concerns below.
- Regarding 12: is there a direct source to refer to it as "critically acclaimed"? If not it may be considered WP:PUFFERY.
- Regarding 18: the source seems to verify everything except that it was released on vinyl and digital download?

TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:18, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheDoctorWho:

i usually put "anon" where there is no listed author. either way, gone
midlands rocks removed; redundant either way
done
done
done
italiciazion issues was due to it being formatted as cite web (because internet archive) vs cite av media; fixed
will run script
removed; i found like one other source but i dont wanna risk puffery either
echoes and dust (ref 4) notes it being band's first proper vinyl release. added to table

anything else? // Chchcheckit (talk) 14:18, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For context, adding "Anon" to a source implies that there's actually a listed author who's name is Anon. If there isn't a listed author it's better to just leave it blank. Regardless, that's it for me! Source review passes. TheDoctorWho (talk) 17:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Focusing strictly on reference formatting and a few spot checks:

Consistent wikilinking in sources
Dates added where available
Consistent date formatting
Authors added where available
Links are live or appropriately archived
Ref 8 – Remove "BrooklynVegan Staff", it's assumed the staff would be the ones writing it and we don't need to specify this if an author isn't listed
Ref 15 – Unless I'm misunderstanding, it's not assumed that Ithaca is the actual publisher of the page, it's simply mentioning that the song was by them
Ref 17 – Change the website to [[Decibel (magazine)|Decibel]]
Ref 22 doesn't verify the directors
If you keep the director column with both of those people listed, the heading should be changed to "Director(s)
Ref 23 – No mention of the album this is in relation to

That's what I've got. Please ping me when you reply. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:36, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh I think that's all? also does "filmed and edited" in ref 22 count. if not, shall remove Chchcheckit (talk) 17:44, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh Also when you state "Consistent date formatting" etc do you mean that I have done that? Chchcheckit (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --Pres N 22:04, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.