User talk:Tiisu Sharif

April 2024

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ... discospinster _talk 02:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Industrialization of education (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Industrialization of education and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 02:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tiisu Sharif! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liance^talk 02:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Industrialization of education (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only minor tinkering was done since the last submission. This draft needs a major rewrite to read like an encyclopedia article rather than an essay.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Industrialization of education and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 08:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Industrialization of education (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Industrialization of education and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 13:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Women and Youth in Education (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:African Women and Youth in Education and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Women and Youth in Education (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Draft was resubmitted unchanged. Please fix the problem before resubmitting, thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:African Women and Youth in Education and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 00:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Women and Youth in Education (June 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Wikishovel was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: AI-generated essay with an AI-generated image.

Wikishovel (talk) 00:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Africa

Sorry to remove your contribution to the above, but its content was largely (not entirely) unsourced, and came across more as an essay than an article. I thought at first it might be a copyright violation, derived from a lecture; it addresses the reader directly and is very discursive. Please try again, and pay attention to Wikipedia's basic requirements (see your welcome message). Haploidavey (talk) 07:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit to Ghana Code Club, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. In this case, the problem is the excessive number of identical blue-links (to Ghana). You don't even really need that one link; it's a very well-known name and is easily looked up. Haploidavey (talk) 21:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that we don't wikilink dates or times any longer (days, months or years). See WP:DATELINK. Haploidavey (talk) 21:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am here to make the same request please! MOS:OVERLINK and MOS:LINKONCE are helpful reading. Innisfree987 (talk) 22:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well noted Tiisu Sharif (talk) 05:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Joy (talk) 09:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tiisu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Tiisu, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox tiisu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Infobox tiisu, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024 - again

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ahmadu Bello University. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
Please stop adding categories to articles, as you keep adding superfluous, general, "parent" categories, when the more precise "child" category is already present - Arjayay (talk) 17:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well noted, Thank you! Tiisu Sharif (talk) 17:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pollution in Tamale

A tag has been placed on Category:Pollution in Tamale indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pollution in Niger (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Garsh2 was:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While this topic appears to be notable, the current state of the article does not present any information specific to Niger. The article appears to only provide the dictionary definition of pollution.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pollution in Niger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Garsh (talk) 01:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pollution in Ghana (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Garsh2 was:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While this topic appears to be notable, the current state of the article does not present any information specific to Niger. The article appears to only provide the dictionary definition of pollution.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pollution in Ghana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Garsh (talk) 01:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoomlion Ghana Company Limited (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zoomlion Ghana Company Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 11:18, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoomlion Ghana Company Limited (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zoomlion Ghana Company Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 12:36, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoomlion Ghana Limited (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zoomlion Ghana Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 14:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zoomlion Ghana Limited

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Zoomlion Ghana Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 14:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoomlion Ghana Limited (July 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Waqar💬 15:11, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Pollution in Ghana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Pollution in Ghana, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 16:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Pollution in Niger

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Pollution in Niger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 16:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Accra College of Education, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please don't add redundant categories when the more specific category is already there. Mason (talk) 19:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pollution in Ghana (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pollution in Ghana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OhHaiMark (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Industrialization of education

Hello, Tiisu Sharif. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Industrialization of education, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit to Stellenbosch University, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 15:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:African Women and Youth in Education

Hello, Tiisu Sharif. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:African Women and Youth in Education, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pollution in Niger

Hello, Tiisu Sharif. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pollution in Niger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pollution in Niger

Hello, Tiisu Sharif. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pollution in Niger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:08, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pollution in Ghana

Hello, Tiisu Sharif. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pollution in Ghana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Industrialization of education

Hello, Tiisu Sharif. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Industrialization of education".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:20, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent article creation

Hi, many of your recent articles (such as Esther Stanford-Xosei and the Pan-African Reparations Agenda, Ta-Nehisi Coates and His Case for Reparations, Sir Hilary Beckles and the Fight for Caribbean Reparations, Queen Mother Audley Moore and the African Reparations Movement) suffer from the same issues: they have a vague title combining two different, related topics, very promotional wording, many unsourced paragraphs, and appear to have been written with the help of generative AI (both because of the writing itself and the very short timestamps between article creation). I invite you to address these issues before creating any further articles. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:45, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aight. Well noted Tiisu Sharif (talk) 20:01, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ta-Nehisi Coates and His Case for Reparations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ta-Nehisi Coates and His Case for Reparations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ta-Nehisi Coates and His Case for Reparations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 16:25, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tiisu Sharif. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Newslinger talk 20:51, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tiisu Sharif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I respectfully request an unblock. I understand that there were concerns related to sockpuppetry and article quality.

However, I would like to clarify that I have only ever used one account and that is Tiisu Sharif — and have never created or edited with any other accounts or the said account Dalvin23 as claimed in the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tiisu Sharif. I therefore believe that there is a mistake

I admit that I used AI tools to assist me in drafting articles like the one about Ta-Nehisi Coates and reparations. My goal was to highlight meaningful topics and authors, not to violate Wikipedia’s policies. I now understand that the content was seen as redundant and not in line with Wikipedia’s standards. I am deeply sorry for any inconviniences caused

I, Tiisu Sharif is committed to editing constructively, improving existing pages rather than creating overlapping ones.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Tiisu Sharif (talk) 12:52, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Thank you for taking the time to clarify the situation in the section below. As you have provided evidence that shows that you are not the same person as Dalvin23, I have unblocked your account. I apologize for the hassle. — Newslinger talk 21:23, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tiisu Sharif, are your Wikipedia edits for a class assignment? We are trying to figure out why your edits overlapped with those of Dalvin23. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 14:35, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing for an Unblock

Hello Newslinger, i do not understand what you mean by " Class Assignment".

However, my edits might be overlapping with Dalvin23 because both of us are participants of the African Wiki Challenge 2025 , which is an anual Edit-a-thon organized Open Foundation West Africa. We are supposed to edit a list of articles. I therefore believe that is where the problem is comming from and not that i have multiple accounts.

Thank you User:Newslinger — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiisu Sharif (talk • contribs) 18:01, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying, Tiisu Sharif. Based on your explanation, it was incorrect to conclude that you were the same editor as Dalvin23, and I apologize for the error. In the sockpuppet investigation, the key piece of evidence that was submitted is that both you and Dalvin23 used a large language model (LLM), such as an AI chatbot or similar tool, to create the now-deleted article Ta-Nehisi Coates and His Case for Reparations. Dalvin23 had been blocked for misusing LLMs.

Please note that LLMs are currently not able to generate content that consistently meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally, LLM-generated comments are not appropriate in Wikipedia discussions, and can be collapsed and disregarded. In light of this, are you willing to commit to refrain from using LLMs in your Wikipedia editing? — Newslinger talk 20:33, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.I am willing to commit to refrain from using LLMs in my wikipedia editing. Thank you very much. Tiisu Sharif (talk) 21:18, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking forward to developing a platform simillar to udemy however, its courses are going to be wikipedia related curses. Users can enroll in courses, track their progress and earn certificates after completing a course.The courses are going to be completely free. I will collaborate with experieced wikipedia editors to create the courses. What do you think about a system like that Tiisu Sharif (talk) 21:46, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think this would be something editors may find helpful. Your idea sounds similar to the WikiEdu training modules, although those lessons are specifically tailored to students, instructors, and professionals, and I don't think they provide certificates. If you want to get feedback about your idea from more editors, I recommend posting it at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab). — Newslinger talk 22:13, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Once again. Thank you. Tiisu Sharif (talk) 22:38, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note that since we already have articles about both Ta-Nehisi Coates and The Case for Reparations, there's absolutely no need whatsoever for a third article that combines those two things into a single topic separately from the two articles that we already have. So please also choose article topics more carefully. Bearcat (talk) 20:52, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well noted. Thank you Tiisu Sharif (talk) 21:18, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's a communication issue here, and I don't think it's your fault. The organizers of the Africa Wiki Challenge 2025 should ideally encourage participants to disclose on their Wikipedia user page that they are involved in the event, so that they are not accused of sockpuppetry or improperly coordinating edits. Also, in the AWC List of Articles, some of the topics with longer names would not warrant standalone articles per the English Wikipedia's guidelines, and many of them are named in a way that does not meet our article titles policy. I understand that the event is international, but the list provides links to edit articles under those exact names, and I'm afraid that is causing participants to run into issues.

Would it be possible to provide this feedback to the event organizers, to help ensure that the event runs more smoothly in future years? — Newslinger talk 21:30, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yh sure. I Will share this with them. Tiisu Sharif (talk) 21:48, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello, I'm Voorts. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab) have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:00, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi voorts, Tiisu Sharif posted their idea on the village pump idea lab in response to my advice above. While the prototype of the home page appears to use a website template designed for paid courses, Tiisu Sharif has said in the above conversation that "The courses are going to be completely free." Is there a more appropriate place that you would recommend for them to seek feedback on their idea? — Newslinger talk 15:03, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't seen your comment before removing the idea lab post. I can't think of a more appropriate place. However, I'm not sure what sort of feedback they want for an unfinished website that claims to be "Trusted by 50,000+ Wikipedia Contributors Worldwide" and has things like the following for course descriptions:

ghagn d kd d dkajkdfj d

ghagn d kd d dkajkdfj d ghagn d kd d dkajkdfj d ghagn d kd d dkajkdfj d ghagn d kd d dkajkdfj d ghagn d kd d dkajkdfj d ghagn d kd d dkajkdfj d

voorts (talk/contributions) 16:04, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It also has fake reviews up and claims to be endorsed by the WMF. voorts (talk/contributions) 16:05, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tiisu Sharif, I think it would be better to develop your project further before going back to the idea lab. I understand that the prototype home page is a mockup, but as voorts explained, the page comes across as misleading to anyone who doesn't know this is a work in progress, so I recommend removing the testimonials and other claims on the page that don't reflect the project in its current state. While a landing page would eventually be important for introducing others to the project, I believe you would receive more useful feedback once there is at least one lesson or course that others can interact with, so I suggest prioritizing the course itself over the landing page.

If you're in contact with the folks at Open Foundation West Africa, perhaps they can provide some input on the kind of learning material that would be most valuable for editors participating in events like the Africa Wiki Challenge 2025. And if you have any questions about Wikipedia or need any information to move forward with the course content, you're always welcome to ask me on my user talk page. Thanks and good luck with the project. — Newslinger talk 19:40, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well noted.

I will work on all the courses and get back to you. The project is about 80% completed so i will just finish it and remove all the dummy data. Tiisu Sharif (talk) 09:09, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To be upfront, I think you will have a hard time getting editors to buy into this project. You were just blocked for your AI use, you had a draft deleted via MfD (a rare occurrence), and you only have two live articles in mainspace (one of which, Esther Stanford-Xosei, appears to be quite promotional in tone). There are already existing wiki-education outlets. If your goal is to get folks in West Africa trained, I would recommend trying to get those existing outlets to help out rather than forming your own external training tool. voorts (talk/contributions) 16:36, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely right. I joined the wiki space last year so I am not very much experienced. So I am looking forward to getting experienced editors to create the courses.

For now, I just want to be sure that the idea is good and editors will be willing to use it. Tiisu Sharif (talk) 01:02, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]