User talk:SuperMarioZaki1

Welcome!

Hello, SuperMarioZaki1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page TV Tokyo has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. DAJF (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm NottNott. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hello Kitty (Avril Lavigne song), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NottNott talk|contrib 14:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tai Chi Chasers has been reverted.
Your edit here to Tai Chi Chasers was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://disneyxd.wikia.com/wiki/Tai_Chi_Chasers) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tai Chi Chasers has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tai Chi Chasers was changed by SuperMarioZaki1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853621 on 2016-09-18T19:41:00+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The LazyTown Movie moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The LazyTown Movie. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and it needs inline citations, rather than just two bare links. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. I have time to work on it SuperMarioZaki1 (talk) 15:17, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The LazyTown Movie (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The LazyTown Movie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SuperMarioZaki1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The LazyTown Movie (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The LazyTown Movie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The LazyTown Movie

Hello, SuperMarioZaki1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The LazyTown Movie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tai Chi Chasers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Willis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The LazyTown Movie

Hello, SuperMarioZaki1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The LazyTown Movie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Haigney moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Michael Haigney. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mekomo (talk) 06:48, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Tai Chi Chasers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Drmies (talk) 22:29, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 22:31, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you to stop making these unexplained reverts. You didn't. In addition, I just saw what you did to User:LTPHarry, and I removed that insulting edit summary of yours. Please refrain from such childish and disgusting insults. Drmies (talk) 22:33, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 22:34, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

SuperMarioZaki1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit my actions were childish and disrespectful. I shouldn't have said the things I've said and did. I apologize for what I've done these past 2 days. It's going to be hard for you to forgive me. I am fine if you don't forgive me. Thank You. SuperMarioZaki1 (talk) 13:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I admit my actions were childish and disrespectful. I shouldn't have said the things I've said and did. I apologize for what I've done these past 2 days. It's going to be hard for you to forgive me. I am fine if you don't forgive me. Thank You. [[User:SuperMarioZaki1|SuperMarioZaki1]] ([[User talk:SuperMarioZaki1#top|talk]]) 13:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I admit my actions were childish and disrespectful. I shouldn't have said the things I've said and did. I apologize for what I've done these past 2 days. It's going to be hard for you to forgive me. I am fine if you don't forgive me. Thank You. [[User:SuperMarioZaki1|SuperMarioZaki1]] ([[User talk:SuperMarioZaki1#top|talk]]) 13:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I admit my actions were childish and disrespectful. I shouldn't have said the things I've said and did. I apologize for what I've done these past 2 days. It's going to be hard for you to forgive me. I am fine if you don't forgive me. Thank You. [[User:SuperMarioZaki1|SuperMarioZaki1]] ([[User talk:SuperMarioZaki1#top|talk]]) 13:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

SuperMarioZaki1 (talk) 13:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Hi @SuperMarioZaki1:, whilst I'm sure the apology is welcomed, you've been told that there's more to your block than that. Can you please read the WP:Guide to appealing blocks and your talk page history, then address the other reason(s)? Remember that you have to show you both understand why you were blocked and how to avoid doing the same thing in future, in as much detail as possible (e.g. describing the individual steps you'll take) Blue Sonnet (talk) 07:58, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for my block was that I made disruptive edits and personal attacks. I have reverted edits more than 3 times (Probably 6 times) on Tai Chi Chasers without explanation as well as making insulting summaries in the reverts.

Next time, I should explain my reverts, show proof to my edits, refrain from bad behavior like (disruptive edits, personal attacks, disrespectful and childish insults and behavior). SuperMarioZaki1 (talk) 11:44, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great start! If someone reverted your edits, what would you do if you were sure you were right? In this example, you can't tell if the other person is being malicious or not and they seem pretty new. If you need help, look at WP:BRD. Blue Sonnet (talk) 15:24, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would look up reliable sources and confirm with them through the page's talk page or the user's talk page. SuperMarioZaki1 (talk) 16:37, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great thank you! Hopefully this'll help an admin to see that you understand how to avoid edit wars & handle disputes, there's a bit of a backlog but someone will take a look as soon as they can :) Blue Sonnet (talk) 13:19, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access

I have reinstated talk page access as a result of UTRS appeal #100301. This is to allow the user to make their unblock request here. I can confirm that SuperMarioZaki1 apologised to LTPHarry on Youtube. User has been advised this is not by itself sufficient to lift the block. WP:GAB explains how to contest the block. --Yamla (talk) 11:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]