User talk:QwertyZ34

Welcome!

Hi QwertyZ34! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 22:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 22:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, i will be more concentrated on the links this time ! Thanks for your warning. QwertyZ34 (talk) 14:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 21:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I understand for the "Borders of China" article, but, for the "Democratic Republic of Congo" article, this time, I don’t understand why my edit got reverted since it’s adding one information. It will be great if you answer. Thank you. QwertyZ34 (talk) 21:54, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because you thanked me

QwertyZ34, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...
YOU'RE WELCOME!
It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! DANGA14^talk

22:07, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi QwertyZ34. Thank you for your work on Shodoba. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for adding this jamoat; as an inhabited place it is likely to be notable. It would be great to expand it, perhaps with information including its coordinates.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:00, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shodoba

@Klbrain: Thanks for your message ! I know, the articles i recently created needs expansion, like coordonate. I will add it really soon. QwertyZ34 (talk) 20:09, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi QwertyZ34. Thank you for your work on Okoloti. Another editor, Kudpung, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please expand this article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for informing me, unfortunately, I created this article only because it was red linked on a list, I don’t have particulary a project to improve it. You are welcome. QwertyZ34 (talk) 12:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi QwertyZ34. Thank you for your work on Ohamaremba. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

geonames.org is a user-editable database and hence isn't considered to be WP:RS. Please add a good source for the settlement.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:06, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zayn Malik birthdate edit

Hello. You recently reverted my edit on Zayn Malik. His birthdate incorrectly had a comma in it which looked like this: "12 January, 1993", when it should really look like this "12 January 1993". There should be no comma, so i removed it, but you incorrectly reverted my edit. I've removed the comma again, please do not remove it again. See date and time notation in the United Kingdom for more info. Thank you. Cherryblossomgirly (talk) 18:24, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok QwertyZ34 (talk) 19:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome QwertyZ34 (talk) 19:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Guinea-Bissau (disambiguation)

Hello QwertyZ34, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Guinea-Bissau (disambiguation), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guinea-Bissau (disambiguation).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for your help Avalotto (talk) 17:31, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @Avalotto, it’s a pleasure helping Wikipedia; to be an good encyclopedia, sourced, and detailled. QwertyZ34 (talk) 20:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ces messieurs de la gâchette moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ces messieurs de la gâchette. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:30, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for your action. I will improve it. QwertyZ34 (talk) 20:07, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blessed Sogah (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blessed Sogah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Fram (talk) 14:59, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raymond Lemoigne

The article Raymond Lemoigne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability (either with this name or as "Le Moigne", the praise by Ford consists of one line, "Les prises de vues étaient signées Raymond Le Moigne". Apart from this he is a name in lists of people who worked on film X or Y, but he seems to get no attention at all specifically.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:15, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Fram, I removed the section which caused problems by its lack of evidence. Im asking you: I am able to remove the proposed deletion notice ? And, for Hagan, I deleted—changed the sources to a new one. I am able to move the article to the main space ? Thanks. QwertyZ34 (talk) 16:44, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While technically you are always allowed to remove a Prod notice, it will only lead to a Wp:AFD being started instead. And your source for Hagan is not a reliable source, which is required. In general, you need to take much more care when creatng articles or adding content, I have removed many other articles to draftspace as well because the sourcing was just dreadful. Fram (talk) 16:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand for many of them; that you moved on draftspace, but, for the Indian villages, I don’t understand why you moved them; they were sufficiently sourced, and yet they are villages. They had 2 sources. QwertyZ34 (talk) 17:17, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One which doesn't work, and one which doesn't mention the village. So in reality they had no good sources. Fram (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, ima fix this. QwertyZ34 (talk) 17:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi QwertyZ34. Thank you for your work on Passiflora pilosicorona. Another editor, Relativity, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your submission! I have added a citation to the article. In the future, please cite any content that would probably be challenged. Cheers :)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Relativity}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

‍Relativity ⚡️ 00:57, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Relativity: Hello, thanks for cheering me ! And also thanks for adding a citation; I will add similar citations to every article I recently created. You are welcome. QwertyZ34 (talk) 06:48, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-paste

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to plant articles. However, please be more careful when copy-pasting the bottom parts of the pages. You are copy-pasting both the WP:SORTKEY in Category:Passiflora and the Wikidata identifiers in the taxonbar for Passiflora harlingii (Q1369986). JTtheOG (talk) 01:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am sorry for any inconvenience I made—produced. I will be more attentive to the next articles I’ll create. Thanks and you are welcome. QwertyZ34 (talk) 06:49, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]