User talk:Manueru-San MM98

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Manueru-San MM98, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Manueru-San MM98, good luck, and have fun. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Uncyclopedia (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

This is not meant for mainspace.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Uncyclopedia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 00:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Manueru-San MM98! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 00:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i was creating a non-mainspace page, where can i create it? Manueru-San MM98 (talk) 00:44, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Uncyclopedia (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Uncyclopedia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Wikipedia talk:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. ObserveOwl (talk) 20:25, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i tried making a essay explanig that wikipedia is not uncyclopedia but it was declined for not bellonging to mainspace and i cannot turn it into a non article page Manueru-San MM98 (talk) 21:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Articles for creation process is intended for creating pages in the main namespace - as in encyclopedic articles. You could make an essay on your own userspace instead, like at User:Manueru-San MM98/Wikipedia is not Uncyclopedia, under the category for humorous user essays. ObserveOwl (talk) 21:23, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about block evasion

Hello, I noticed that you disclosed having a past account on Wikipedia here. While this is normally fine, your past account was indefinitely blocked. You need to use that account's talk page to appeal your block and read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 06:02, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

how can i? (EDIT: i have left the message on my old account and i have readed the guide to appealing blocks) Manueru-San MM98 (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) (talk) 19:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for self-admitted block evasion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:07, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manueru-San MM98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made it clear on my old account's talk page tha i created this new account with the purpose to build a encyclopedia, and i have readed the guide to appealing blocks, i am not commiting block evasion to continue like i was in the past, as stated by the disclamer on my old account's userpage. I do understand why i have been blocked. It should be reversed because im now experienced enough to create a encyclopedia. All of my current edits are done in good faith. Manueru-San MM98 (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) (talk) 23:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block is against you, not your account. Any edit you make while that block remains active is evasion. In claiming otherwise, you make it fairly obvious that the block is still necessary. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:27, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Manueru-San MM98 (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) (talk) 23:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sir Sputnik I already know that the block is against me, not my account, im not claiming otherwise. If you want, assume bad faith and then block yourself. I literally dont have anything than to spam unbock requests until i finally get unblocked. And now listen, i can excuse getting blocked for sockpuppetry but i cannot excuse a block made with bad faith, please read Wikipedia:Assume good wraith for more info. Manueru-San MM98 (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) (talk)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manueru-San MM98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I already know that the block is against me, not my account, im not claiming otherwise. If you want, assume bad faith and then block yourself. I literally dont have anything than to spam unbock requests until i finally get unblocked. And now listen, i can excuse getting blocked for sockpuppetry but i cannot excuse a block made with bad faith, please read Wikipedia:Assume good wraith for more info.Manueru-San MM98 (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) (talk) 02:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to think that because you are now acting in good faith, that you can just resume editing. That is not the case. You need to get your original account unblocked first. 331dot (talk) 08:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please help me on unblocking my old account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manueru-San MM98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I cannot find any method to get my old account first X_X Manueru-San MM98 (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) (talk) 20:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In that case, this is the end of the line for you here. Yamla (talk) 20:06, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.