User talk:MHD1234567890

Hello, MHD1234567890, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

MHD1234567890, good luck, and have fun. Mr. Rasel Hasan (talk) 05:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 kirkuk crisis (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothytyy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 kirkuk crisis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Timothytyy (talk) 01:45, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MHD1234567890! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Timothytyy (talk) 01:45, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of wars involving Kurdistan Region, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shadow4dark (talk) 02:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kirkuk Revolt

Hello, MHD1234567890. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kirkuk Revolt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kirkuk Revolt

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kirkuk Revolt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unreliable page, the "Kirkuk Revolt" comes from a Pro-Kurdish site its actually a Vandalised version of the Fall of Kirkuk that occurred in 1959.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kirkukturk3 (talk) 21:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:2023 kirkuk crisis

A tag has been placed on Draft:2023 kirkuk crisis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Page with exterme vandalism, despite the Patriotic union of Kurdistan winning no crisis happened or the kurdish governor did not regard Kirkuk as an "Only Kurdish territory".

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kirkukturk3 (talk) 22:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2023 kirkuk crisis

Hello, MHD1234567890. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 kirkuk crisis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kirkuk Revolt

Hello, MHD1234567890. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kirkuk Revolt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:06, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rawandiz Revolt moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rawandiz Revolt. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 16:24, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now? MHD1234567890 (talk) 21:12, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rawandiz Revolt

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that the article Rawandiz Revolt has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rawandiz Revolt (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rawandiz Revolt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Battle of Hattin, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 02:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Urmia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Siege of Urmia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Margavar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Margavar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:12, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. I have moved two of your pages back to draftspace because the sources didn't seem to support the article (or the bits they supposedly referenced). I notice e.g. in Draft:Siege of Urmia (which you put in the mainspace) that the single source says nothing about the Siege of Urmia. Please always include page numbers to help determine whether a source is used correctly or not, and certainly always make certain that the sources really support the text you add. Fram (talk) 16:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Rawandiz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Rawandiz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Rawandiz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rawandiz Revolt (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MWFwiki were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The biggest issue, here, is that this article needs a major overhaul in-regards to its grammar, etc. The English utilized here is not up to an encyclopedic standard.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rawandiz Revolt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MWFwiki (talk) 04:03, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kurdish unification of 1830

A tag has been placed on Kurdish unification of 1830 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This did not happen, there is no mention of this in the sources posted, this page is just an Propaganda

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Iranian112 (talk) 15:10, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kurdish unification of 1830 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kurdish unification of 1830, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurdish unification of 1830 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, MHD1234567890, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Elihtenio (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kayoonjuk Massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Massacre of Rabban Hormuzd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Massacre of Rabban Hormuzd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massacre of Rabban Hormuzd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Annwfwn (talk) 21:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Giving out False speedy deletion

This user has been giving out false speedy deletes on Assyrian wiki pages out of frustration because he and his friends Wikipedia pages has justifiably been nominated for Deletion.

he doesn’t provide reasons for the speedy delete, the wiki pages are well made with multiple sources cited. he and his friends are Kurds from TikTok who are prompting to remove any Assyrian page that somewhat makes them look “bad”, this doesn’t belong on Wikipedia.

the user isn’t qualified to make such decisions.

This user has currently managed to put a speedy delete on the following pages Battle of Aqra Dagh (1920) and Defense of Jujar (1920). Etcnoel1 (talk) 17:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Etcnoel1: Those weren't speedy deletion tags, but malformed AfDs. I've now removed them since they served no purpose, and were being used incorrectly. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright my mistake, I must’ve misunderstood. Thanks anyway! Etcnoel1 (talk) 20:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Mardin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Mardin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Mardin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Rawanduz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Battle of Rawanduz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Rawandiz. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 08:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rawanduz Revolt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rawanduz Revolt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rawanduz Revolt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MHD1234567890

I am @Shaneapickle and I want to have a discussion with you, why do you think you do not need sources when like 100% of the mainspace pages on this website and the other language versions, have sources. Shaneapickle (talk) 12:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the importance of sources, and I see now that my earlier comment about not needing them for the Yazidi massacres was mistaken. I said that because I assumed it was common knowledge, but I realize now that all content, even widely known events, should be properly sourced. I’ll make sure to correct that and provide the necessary references. MHD1234567890 (talk) 13:10, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See Persecution of Yazidis I found the source here. MHD1234567890 (talk) 13:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also if you want to read things about sources and stuff, here is a few links

WP:NOTABILITY

WP:MOS

WP:What is an article?

And if you need any questions on editing and page making, either ask the live help desk chat, the WP:TEAHOUSE ,your assigned mentor, or me. Shaneapickle (talk) 13:24, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In regard of the Rawanduz Revolt, have you not seen that there are multiple sources cited? What’s your cause of speedy deletion? Etcnoel1 (talk) 13:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not talking to MHD on the rawanduz revolt thing, im talking to him about his other pages and their sources. Shaneapickle (talk) 14:20, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to make clear that I harbor no hostility toward you. However, user “Kajmer05” appears motivated by anti‑Kurdish nationalist sentiments and repeatedly seeks to delete or ban any pages related to Kurdistan. This pattern is evident on user “fram”’s talk page, where they discuss and attempt to remove the article. MHD1234567890 (talk) 14:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you know those pages that you made might have a conflict of interest? Shaneapickle (talk) 14:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that writing about topics I’m closely involved with can raise concerns. Please let me know which sections you feel may be biased, and I’ll gladly work to improve their neutrality. I’m also happy to invite other editors to review or take over these articles to ensure they meet Wikipedia’s COI and verifiability guidelines. MHD1234567890 (talk) 14:49, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also I might report the guy who is trying to remove your pages and the kurdish nationalist pages to the admins because this feels like a violation Shaneapickle (talk) 14:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking action because for months now, other editors and I have had our pages deleted. MHD1234567890 (talk) 15:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

well im not gonna do that right now, first im gonna ask him Shaneapickle (talk) 15:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

nvm i discussed with him, and i am reporting this edit war Shaneapickle (talk) 15:33, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why ? Give an explanation MHD1234567890 (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

technically its a disagreement, and im sorta on kajmers side on this one, your throwing mud at his name for no absolute reason Shaneapickle (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because he keeps deleting my pages for minor reason MHD1234567890 (talk) 15:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

do you have proof? Shaneapickle (talk) 15:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First of all he once deleted “Battle of Rawandiz” then “Rawandiz Revolt” for the same reason, as I said ever sources I showed PROVE that the battle or the revolt of Rawanduz existed, in reality there’s no NEED of debate, every Kurds know about this revolt, Fram or whatever the one who’s trying to refute my page say that the name of Rawanduz doesn’t appear much on my source it’s normal when the book mentions “Rawandooz, Ravandooz, Rowanduz” it only mention “Muhammad pasha, Mir Kor, Kurdish pasha” but they don’t understand this, and the Battle of Rawanduz got deleted while the source literally describe everything of the battle, this literally prove that the admin Fram or kajmer05 do not admit this maybe because of their ideology, everything is correct in my page and the sources are reliable (IF YOU READ IT CORRECTLY). MHD1234567890 (talk) 16:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Shaneapickle (talk) 15:43, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Hello, I am here to report a disagreement, (i dont really understand the ANI). Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 15:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]