User talk:JohnMizuki

This is JohnMizuki's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rodolfo Camacho Viera has been accepted

Rodolfo Camacho Viera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo ⁺ ^c 14:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on De Daemonialitate et Incubis et Succubis

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page De Daemonialitate et Incubis et Succubis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belzeba (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It does not seem to pass WP:GNG, with too few reliable sources to indicate standalone notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Belzeba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Belzeba

Hello, JohnMizuki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Belzeba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Going Ape for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Going Ape is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Going Ape until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts (talk/contributions) 03:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Belzeba

Hello, JohnMizuki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Belzeba".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Xi Van Fleet

Hello, JohnMizuki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Xi Van Fleet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Xi Van Fleet

Hello, JohnMizuki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Xi Van Fleet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:15, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Domingo Prat has been accepted

Domingo Prat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Baqi:) (talk) 13:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Bryce and Son has been accepted

David Bryce and Son, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jules Lachelier has been accepted

Jules Lachelier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:43, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uğurcan Yüce (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uğurcan Yüce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnMizuki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pierre Mesnard

Hello, JohnMizuki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pierre Mesnard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi JohnMizuki. Thank you for your work on Bernardino Scardeone. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article. I noticed that it includes translation of part of the equivalent article on it:Wiki. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this! quite the contrary. However, translations from other Wikis do need to be attributed (I've done that for this article). Take a look at Help:Translation § Licensing for further information. Best wishes.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

@Ingratis: There must be a misunderstanding, I didn't translate from the Italian article, as it is unsourced.

I'm sorry if I've misunderstood. The section "Early life" in the English article is extremely similar to the first two paragraphs of the section "Origini e formazioni" in the Italian one. May I take it that you translated from the Dizionario biografico? The Italian article does also acknowledge this as a source (in fact, its only source), although not in the form of an inline citation. Ingratis (talk) 12:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: On the Demonomania of the Sorcerers has been accepted

On the Demonomania of the Sorcerers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ L 🌸 (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trinidad Huerta

Is this translated from the equivalent article on the Spanish Wikipedia? if so, would you please add the attribution as above, as I see you have recently been doing to your other translations.

For clarity, translation from other Wikipedias is fine as long as it is correctly attributed (but see below). Copying or translating from public domain sources is similarly fine if attributed. Copying, translating or close paraphrasing from copyright sources (such as the Treccani website, for example) is not OK - WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE. This also applies to articles on other Wikipedias if they are copyright violations. Ingratis (talk) 12:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wrote both articles, the one in Spanish and the one in English. JohnMizuki (talk) 12:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]