Jump to content

User talk:Iwannarightelle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:07, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Iwannarightelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:07, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Joyous!. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bulacan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 04:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Our team resubmitted again, as we already spoke to the other creator to take down their submission, since this version that we submitted has more injected reliable sources. This is the official author, who is very close to the real person being written here. Thank you Iwannarightelle (talk) 05:14, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Emille Joson, from its old location at User:Iwannarightelle/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 08:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay okay thank you, we have carefully followed all the guidelines. I sincerely hope for approval this time. 🙏🏻 Thank you so much for your time and consideration. We love Wikipedia. Iwannarightelle (talk) 09:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emille Joson (April 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:20, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay! Kindly give me the link where we can reedit this. Thank you. Iwannarightelle (talk) 10:12, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You can edit what remains of the draft, but I'm not going to give you back the copyright violations, obviously.
You keep talking in the plural voice ("we"), how many people have access to this account? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:17, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I sincerely apologize for the misunderstanding. In the Philippines, we often use the word “we” as a way to express (on our camp or on our side" it's inclusion thing for respect, but to clarify, I am the only one with access to this account. Anyway! Sir I have already re-edited the wiki, and I hope I got everything right this time. Thank you so much. Iwannarightelle (talk) 11:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Iwannarightelle! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Asia Pacific Film Institute

[edit]

Hi Iwannarightelle. I noticed your edits to Asia Pacific Film Institute and want to point out that your should not be adding external links in the text or captions: they go either as part of the source citations or external links. See guidance at WP:EL. I have removed some where you have linked to IMDb, which Wikipedia considers an unreliable source: see WP:IMDB. It is allowed as a link in the external links section and we have templates for this, described at WP:IMDBTEMPLATE. Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mr. Mike! My apologies for this, I’ll make sure to avoid it next time and will include artists’ IMDb pages through citations from now on. Thank you for informing me and for the revision as well. 💕 I’ll be reading and follow these guidelines you sent. Thank you, thank you! 💕🙏🏻 Iwannarightelle (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I just did a revision to the caption part and officially removed the IMDB links. My apologies again! 💕🙏🏻 Iwannarightelle (talk) 17:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I still see four external links to the APFI website in the captions. There's one in the External links, so these others aren't needed. Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:08, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Sir Mike, Noted on this. I have now removed all the links from the photo captions. Sorry again. 💕🙏🏻 Iwannarightelle (talk) 10:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]