User talk:HyperWriteee

Hi HyperWriteee! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 13:59, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Transparency Notice

I am contributing to the article about the Sadequain Foundation as a representative of the organization. As a part of this contribution, I aim to ensure that the article adheres to Wikipedia’s strict guidelines, follows a neutral point of view, and is verifiable.

Please feel free to offer feedback, suggestions, or concerns about the article. I am more than happy to work collaboratively to improve the content.

Thank you for your understanding and collaboration!

March 2025

Hello, I'm DMacks. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Carpet, but the sources you provided do not seem to meet the reliable sources guidelines. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 14:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:58, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HyperWriteee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've recently created the account and being paid by Sadequain Foundation as I shown on the draft and my talk page for transparency. I understand Wikipedia's policies and sincerely regret any misunderstanding. I did not intend to violate any rules, and I assure you that I will follow all guidelines moving forward. If this was a mistake, I request a review of my edits. I am willing to cooperate fully to resolve this. Thank you. HyperWriteee (talk) 21:21, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not even attempt to address the reason for the block. Yamla (talk) 21:25, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HyperWriteee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I acknowledge my block and wish to clarify that I was editing as a paid editor, which I disclosed on **Draft:Sadequain_Foundation** and my talk page per Wikipedia’s paid editing policy. My edits were made transparently and in good faith, without intent to violate Wikipedia’s policies. I accept the concerns raised and regret any misalignment with Wikipedia's guidelines like Wikipedia:SOCK. I am committed to following all policies, including COI and paid editing rules, and request reconsideration of my block. — HyperWriteee (talk) 14:26, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You keep bringing up paid editing but that has nothing to do with the reason for the block, sockpuppetry. You should either request unblock from the Sadequain Foundation USA account or otherwise disclose your relationship with it. 331dot (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HyperWriteee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I acknowledge that I created multiple accounts, including **Sadequain Foundation USA** and **Dr. Salman Ahmad Naqvi**, because I was unaware of Wikipedia’s policies. I now understand this was a violation of WP:SOCK. I have since read and understood Wikipedia’s policies on WP:SOCK, WP:PAID, and WP:COI. I take full responsibility for my mistakes and regret any issues caused. I am committed to following Wikipedia’s rules and will only edit using a single, properly disclosed account. I respectfully request reconsideration of my block. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Deeply, deeply inappropriate to request an unblock here while simultaneously requesting an unblock over at User talk:Sadequain Foundation USA. Don't pull that again. Yamla (talk) 18:23, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.