User talk:Harajaru345tyu

This is Harajaru345tyu's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hathi Singh Tomar (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hathi Singh Tomar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 03:26, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Harajaru345tyu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 03:26, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hathi Singh Tomar (April 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: We don't accept entirely LLM-generated articles. Please rewrite the draft from scratch if you want a chance of this draft passing.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 03:33, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Talk:Jats, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 14:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Jawahar Singh, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:06, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

meri jo jawahar singh ji ki photos add kari thi tune hatai ku Harajaru345tyu (talk) 05:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Anangpal Tomar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Anangpal Tomar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 21:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Hathi Singh Tomar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Raja Hathi Singh Tomar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:29, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sunny Mundiyara

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sunny Mundiyara, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dhilu Dhillon moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dhilu Dhillon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Having a draft rejected means or an article moved to draft space means it is unsuitable for article space. Do not recreate them or move them yourself if this happens. At this rate the articles you are creating would be considered disruptive editing. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sunny Mundiyara

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sunny Mundiyara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 20:00, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhilu Dhillon (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Suitskvarts was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dhilu Dhillon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Suitskvarts (talk) 22:07, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mundiyara moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mundiyara. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:27, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunny Mundiyara (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sunny Mundiyara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 13:04, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

International Jat day

Hey @Harajaru345tyu, you have created International Jat Day but this article has few sources and too much content. So please add more sources to keep it on Wikipedia, otherwise International Jat Day will be deleted or drafted by another experienced user or administrator. Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 01:28, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. I'm in the process of adding more reliable and published sources to support the content and improve the article’s overall quality. The intention behind creating this page was to highlight a cultural observance recognized by many in the Jat community, and I understand the importance of meeting Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing standards. I’ll continue updating the article with verifiable references shortly. Appreciate your patience and guidance! Harajaru345tyu (talk) 02:22, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. I appreciate the heads-up regarding the administrative ruling. I understand the importance of following Wikipedia’s policies and maintaining a neutral and respectful approach when contributing to sensitive topics, especially in areas like South Asian social groups. I’ll ensure to stay aligned with the expected standards and page-specific guidelines. If I have any questions or need further clarification, I’ll be sure to reach out for guidance. Thanks again for the support! Harajaru345tyu (talk) 06:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Danveer Pandu Godara

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Danveer Pandu Godara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Agent 007 (talk) 14:48, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of International Jat Parliament for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Jat Parliament is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Jat Parliament until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Agent 007 (talk) 14:57, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification. I appreciate the opportunity to contribute to the discussion. I will review the concerns raised and work on improving the article by adding more reliable sources and addressing any issues that may have been identified. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I will ensure that the article meets these standards. I will refrain from removing the deletion notice until the discussion is concluded. Harajaru345tyu (talk) 15:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not respond to other editors with AI-generated garbage.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the importance of maintaining high standards on Wikipedia, and I’m here to contribute constructively. I’ve been working to improve the article based on policies like WP:GNG and by adding reliable sources. If there are specific content concerns, I’m happy to address them collaboratively. Let’s keep the discussion focused on the merits of the topic and the content of the article. Thanks. Harajaru345tyu (talk) 16:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’d appreciate it if we could keep the conversation civil and focused on content, not personal attacks. If there’s a specific issue with any edit or source, I’m open to discussing it based on Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Let’s work together constructively. Harajaru345tyu (talk) 16:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I tell you that AI-generated posts are disruptive on Wikipedia, and you respond with another AI-generated post. This is not a personal attack but a warning that your behavior is not suitable for a collaborative project. If you continue in this fashion, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

these are not ai generate Harajaru345tyu (talk) 17:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As per analysis from GPT detection tools, they are AI generated posts/reply. Agent 007 (talk) 18:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please stop. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), you may be blocked from editing. Agent 007 (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

dont be send irregullar messesge i know and i only do work under wiki policies. Harajaru345tyu (talk) 01:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

and i dont know why you send irregular copyrights Harajaru345tyu (talk) 01:59, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Jlktutu (talk) 04:27, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Vladko Shalamanov, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 04:36, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok , i gladly sorry Harajaru345tyu (talk) 04:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Scott Williams (rugby union), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Imwin567 (talk) 04:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I'll make sure not to repeat this in the future Harajaru345tyu (talk) 04:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mundiyara (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Garsh2 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mundiyara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Garsh (talk) 02:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve updated the draft Mundiyara with multiple references and sources. Kindly consider reviewing it again. Harajaru345tyu (talk) 02:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not really one of the reviewers, but I can tell you that just putting a list of sources isn't going to satisfy the requirements for proper sourcing. You'll need to include footnotes for the information in your article, so someone reading it can see exactly where the material is coming from. You can read this page to see how to use footnotes for your citations.
I would also suggest that you begin using edit summaries when you make changes to articles. The MANY times you've "blanked" an article with no explanation looks like vandalism to others. Joyous! Noise! 04:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sunny Mundiyara

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sunny Mundiyara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Agent 007 (talk) 05:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Altenmann >talk 05:42, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. Too much time is being spent in the unproductive discussion at ANI. Please contribute at a Wikipedia conducted in your language.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 08:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harajaru345tyu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am a real human and I truly apologize if my writing style had given the impression of being AI-generated. My aim throughout has been to contribute constructively, especially on matters that are important to me. I now realize that my communication may not have been up to expectations, and I am happy to make changes. I humbly request a second chance and will speak more clearly and constructively from now on. Thank you for your understanding. Harajaru345tyu (talk) 08:42, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per GPTZero, 100% likely AI-generated. As there are two open requests, I'm declining this one. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Harajaru345tyu (talk) 08:42, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harajaru345tyu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I realize the reason for this block and sincerely apologize for any disruption. I am committed to following the policies of Wikipedia in the future, particularly with regard to neutral, properly sourced content. I humbly request that the block be lifted or that I be offered a temporary unblock chance to demonstrate constructive editing. Harajaru345tyu (talk) 08:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the reviewing admin, you may refer to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Harajaru345tyu_WP:NOTHERE. Thanks Agent 007 (talk) 08:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The user is still using AI for un-blocking in all requests. Agent 007 (talk) 08:56, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harajaru345tyu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a human being and am seriously interested in contributing to Wikipedia, especially the domain of Indian history and underrepresented topics like Jat history and culture. I now understand that my writing style may have seemed too polished or AI-type, and I apologize if that was misleading. I assure you that I am not employing AI tools to contribute disruptively or to mislead anyone. I will sincerely try to write more naturally and clearly from now on. I humbly request a second chance to contribute constructively and work in good faith with the Wikipedia community. Thank you. Harajaru345tyu (talk) 09:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicat request. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you please stop opening new unblock requests, I just closed one, only to find that you've opened a new one. You need only one open request at any given time. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:07, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brother, I have understood. From next time I will keep only one request and will not open new requests again and again. I am sorry if anyone has faced any problem. I will be a little careful from now on. -- Harajaru345tyu (talk) 09:10, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure I'm not your brother.

And when I told you not to open new unblock requests, you decided to go ahead and do just that. You have been blocked for lack of competence and generally wasting people's time. I suggest you stop digging your hole, it is quite deep enough already. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harajaru345tyu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i understand my mistakes and apologize for whatever I did wrong to Wikipedia. i understand that i wasted the community's time by using Ai in my requests and this was disruptive behavior. Now i promise to improve my editing In the future and follow Wikipedia's rules. I will do my best to avoid Ai-generated content and focus on improving my contribution to Wikipedia. If I get this chance, i will edit well. Harajaru345tyu (talk) 09:12, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to have difficulty understanding instructions; you opened a new request while I was closing another duplicate request. This doesn't give me much faith that you will follow other instructions given to you. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

please unblock my account

To the Administrator,

I would like to apologize for the matters that have led to the blockage of my account. I understand the issues raised, and realize that my past behavior was disruptive. I have learned from this lesson and I promise to try to follow the Wikipedia guidelines more assiduously in future. please reconsider my block. I promise to contribute positively to the community and be careful in my future edits.

Thanks for your understanding.

Sincerely,

Harajaru345tyu

please unblock my account

Hey Admins,

I am herein requesting the lifting of the block. I realize my posts, particularly what I wrote on the WP: ANI page, had most likely caused disruption and was not up to our community's extremely high standards. The replies, as I sit back and retrospect my writing, were in the wrong tone and equally confused without alarming others unnecessarily in a sense.

I guarantee you I will follow and abide by the policies of Wikipedia, ensuring that my edits will be constructive, respectful and conformant to community standards.

I humbly ask please consider and please unblock my account for further keeping me making valuable plus-positive contribution to Wikipedia.

Thank you very much for your consideration and concerned view upon the matter today.

Regards,

Harajaru345tyu Harajaru345tyu (talk) 10:13, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

unblock account

Dearest Admins,

I am hereby requesting the removal of the block. I understand that my posts, especially that made on WP: ANI page, caused disruptions not up to the very high standards our community has set. The responses, on reflection of my writing, were in bad tone and equally confused without unnecessarily alarming others in a sense.

I assure you that I will follow and abide by the Wikipedia policies: I will not only make constructive edits, but I will do so respectfully and in conformity with community standards.

Therefore, I humbly ask you to consider and unblock my account to enable me to continue making use-well contributions to Wikipedia.

Thank you very much for your consideration and for taking the time to read this matter.

Regards,

Harajaru345tyu Harajaru345tyu (talk) 10:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Complete lack of competence and a waste of our time. TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:33, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hathi Singh Tomar

A tag has been placed on Draft:Hathi Singh Tomar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

LLM generated content

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Agent 007 (talk) 14:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]