User talk:Funtiberry

Alchetron is user-generated and cannot be used as a source

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contribution attempts have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it here. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:38, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You. Funtiberry (talk) 08:26, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ikechi Uko have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ikechi Uko was changed by Funtiberry (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899117 on 2025-03-10T08:48:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:48, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nse Essien, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:45, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You removed nine citations. You need to give a valid reason for doing so. Adakiko (talk) 09:46, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Asijiki Coalition for the Decriminalisation of Sex Work have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 10:50, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 02:52, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fred Emery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Self-managing. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ✶Qux yz ✶ 10:58, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 13:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned on multiple occasions and have not engaged with your fellow editors' concerns. As such you have lost access to edit articles until you do Star Mississippi 13:29, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Star Mississippi, I appreciate you pointing out my mistakes I’m new to Wikipedia… I’d appreciate feedback on how to contribute appropriately also I would engage more constructively when editors raised concerns. Thank you Funtiberry (talk) 11:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Funtiberry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to appeal my indefinite block. I acknowledge that I did not adequately address concerns raised by other editors in the past. I have reviewed Wikipedia’s policies on consensus,and what Wikipedia is not, and I am committed to working collaboratively with the community. I apologize for my previous conduct and request an opportunity to demonstrate improved editing behavior. Thank you for considering my appeal. —Funtiberry (talk) 11:13, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Excellent. You have an opportunity to demonstrate that, not just claim that. Make edit requests on article talk pages. Once you have a significant number of these edit requests accepted, then but only then should you contest your block. Yamla (talk) 12:31, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Re-appeal

I would like to re-appeal my indefinite block. and also how do I know if an edit request has been accepted Funtiberry (talk) 19:49, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Funtiberry! The thread you created at the Teahouse, How do i get Editors to review my edit request, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:09, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal to Star Mississippi

@Star Mississippi:,

I am writing to appeal my block, as I understand I was blocked for not engaging with fellow editors’ concerns despite multiple warnings. I sincerely apologize for my lack of communication and for any disruption this caused. I’ve reviewed Wikipedia’s policies on collaboration, dispute resolution, and the blocking policy, and I recognize where I fell short in responding to other editors. Recently, I made various edit requests that were reviewed by other editors, which I believe shows my effort to work constructively within Wikipedia’s processes. Moving forward, I commit to actively participating in talk page discussions, responding promptly to editors’ concerns, and ensuring my contributions align with community standards. I am eager to contribute positively and respectfully to Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Funtiberry (talk) 15:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Funtiberry. I see you have taken @Yamla's advice in making talk page requests, thank you. Please file an unblock request and another admin will review it. (Note to any reviewing admin, I have not had the chance to look into their TP requests but am fine with an unblock if you see merit) Star Mississippi 02:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you... i would do just that. Funtiberry (talk) 22:16, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Reappeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Funtiberry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrators, Why I was blocked was because I did not agree with my fellow editors' concerns. As such, I lost access to edit articles. I have learned my lessons, and I have made a positive impact by using edit requests on talk pages. I have also been able to reason constructively with different editors during this period. In this light, I plead that my block be revoked. I have an opportunity to demonstrate improved editing behavior if given another chance

Thank you. Funtiberry (talk) 14:29, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I think this is worth a shot. Courtesy ping to Star Mississippi. 331dot (talk) 11:11, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]