User talk:Egg470

December 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to M14 rifle, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 14:59, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Keith Daniel Williams, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. MOS:CAPSUCCINCT Inexpiable (talk) 08:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Operation Flow, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 19:15, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

bot Egg470 (talk) 20:57, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of people scheduled to be executed in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Inexpiable (talk) 21:50, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Anthony Tanzi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Michael Anthony Tanzi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Inexpiable (talk) 19:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did mention that this was my first time creating a Wikipedia page, and that I'd appreciate if others could help edit it, preferably more experienced editors like you if you're not a bot Egg470 (talk) 21:13, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Egg470: Please read what I wrote. Not every person scheduled for execution SHOULD HAVE A WIKIPEDIA PAGE. This individual and his crime is not notable enough for Wikipedia. Furthermore, very little content was even in the article. Inexpiable (talk) 21:52, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Egg470. Let me share my opinion. Its understandable, since you created for yourself an article the first time. This comes with experience and time for you to refine your edits and writing style. You can follow guidelines on notability and sourcing of the article. I myself got a rocky experience with my first articles a couple of months after joining Wikipedia some years back. In my own case, I also need to caution myself in creating articles because of certain factors (like notability and lack of sources) that prevented me from doing so, and partly due to some fellow editors (like Inexpiable and Haunted Spy) reminding me to caution against creating articles for every case. I can't say I am perfect but it takes learning and you will get through too. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 05:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Anthony Tanzi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Anthony Tanzi. Thanks! Inexpiable (talk) 19:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Anthony Tanzi has another new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Anthony Tanzi. Thanks! NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 23:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]