User talk:Bonadea

Permission for Draft:Era Joshi Submission for Review

Please provide me the permission to submit Draft: Era Joshi for review because I can change the draft to address the concerns of the reviewers.Zoe Sharma (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Absolutely not. You can edit the rejected draft but you may not submit it for AfC review. If you do edit the draft so it shows any shred of notability, you can ask about it, but that must happen first.

What is your connection to Era Joshi? --bonadea contributions talk 13:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Seeking clarity on Notable person submission

Hi Draft:James Brown (New South Wales politician), thank you for your comment on the profile I am submitting (Draft:James Brown (New South Wales politician)) I would like to ask for your guidance to what need to be addressed to resubmit this for approval? For clarity I have added further references from reputable third party sources to back up this submission, however, note that I also don't want my draft to be deleted if it isn't 100% correct. Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you soon Cameronwise (talk) 02:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
I trimmed the links above to remove some extra code. --bonadea contributions talk 14:38, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Cameronwise: and thanks for your message. Drafts are not deleted quite so quickly. Usually, a draft will be deleted 6 months after it was last edited, unless they contain copyright violations, personal attacks, or blatant promotion, none of which applies to this draft. About resubmitting it – I am fairly sure that if you were to resubmit it now, it would be declined again. All the information in the Early life, Education, and Military career lacks citations; in a biography of a living person, all information should have an in-line citation, to verify the content. I can't see any of that information in any of the sources, other than some of the military stuff (though I haven't scrutinised the sources that closely). Where do the claims about his early life, schooling, and personal details such as number of children come from? --bonadea contributions talk 14:38, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Bonadea,

Thank you for your detailed response—it is much appreciated. I am not particularly familiar with the backend processes of Wiki, so your explanation has provided me with much-needed clarity.

Regarding in-line citations, I now understand the importance of verifying content and will address this in the amendments. Once these updates are made, would it be possible to have the submission reviewed by you again before resubmission?

Additionally, I now too, have a better understanding of the guidelines concerning 'self-promotion.' This profile is intended to highlight the individual’s notable contributions as a community leader, not for personal promotion. Considering this, and the origin of the initial submission, would it be better to amend the current submission or start anew with a clean slate?

Once again, thank you for your guidance, and I look forward to your advice on how best to proceed.

Kind regards Cameronwise (talk) 22:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Mukesh Mishra

highly appreciate your contributions. Kindly request to justify the article page of Mukesh Mishra, which is meet notability guidelines as per the Wikipedia page creation. with all available references are realiable and indipendent sources like Prabhat Khabar, Hindustan (newspaper), ETV Network, Josh Talks, e.t.c. request to move in mainspace of article and help to improve @Bonadea Thanks with best regards Dbgbr (talk) 16:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

How to revise my article

Bonadea Could you please help review and provide guidance on improving this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Airpaz? Your feedback would be greatly appreciated! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jodysetiawan23 (talk • contribs) 08:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Alexander Tetelbaum

Can you move this back to draft? It looks like the creator of this article bypassed the AfC process and moved into mainspace themselves. Natg 19 (talk) 03:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Alexander Tetelbaum

Thanks for your last comments — they helped me to understand what to do and improve the submission.

I believe that all the issues, which you specified previously, are addressed now. It includes a drastic size reduction (~70%), using a neutral style, adding additional sources, and removing inline references. I hope that any kind of advertisement is corrected too. In the last page version, there are only facts, sources, and links. No personal opinion.

As you asked I added additional sources — now references have more than 100 sources. Any statement that was not backed up with a source is removed.

I hope that the page is ready for review.

Thanks Atetelbaum (talk) 16:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Request on 16:38:02, 27 January 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by Mirkster

• Mirkster (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:SymphonyAI (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for taking the time to review my draft submission.

C3.ai is another very similar company that is no more notable than SymphonyAI and yet they have an article that was created less than two years ago. Can you please let me know why C3.ai can have a article but not SymphonyAI?

Also the founder and current chairman of SymphonyAI Romesh Wadhwani has his own article so he must be notable enough?

Mirkster (talk) 16:38, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

@Mirkster: thank you for your message. It is important to recognise the fact that no company – and no person – "has a Wikipedia article", and that there are many, many articles that do not meet the notability criteria or other Wikipedia guidelines. So the fact that there is an article about another company has no bearing on whether or not there could be an article about SymphonyAI. That being said, it is only natural that you should compare articles about other companies; I think there is more notability shown in the article about C3.ai, because it does not simply talk about run-of-the-mill activities like funding and acquisitions (and this source is a textbook example of what is meant by "significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources"). I hope that makes sense. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 21:18, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

@Bondea: Thank for pointing out the distinction that no company or person has ownership of an article. I meant to say they have an article written about them, not that they own it but I see now that my choice of words did imply ownership.

This is my first article so thank you for providing that textbook example, yes it does make sense now. I am interested in AI technologies and believe there should be article about this company because of its unified AI platform which makes it unique. I will see if I find a good source to verify this.

Thanks again for your comments and guidance. Mirkster (talk) 09:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Goonicide

I was about to comment in concurring with deletion, but I see that the drafts in question have already been deleted. Those drafts that you nominated were not eligible for G4. I don't know whether the timing made them ineligible, but they were definitely ineligible because they were not in the same namespace, which means that they were not sufficiently identical, because the rules for deletion from article space and the rules for deletion from draft space are significantly different. I was about to comment to that effect, but to agree that the drafts should be deleted as violating the policy on biographies of recently dead people when the only newsworthy matter was the death. My point is that G4 never applies to drafts of articles that were deleted. Sometimes when an article is deleted, it is deleted because it should be in draft space. In this case, the drafts were deleted because they should not have been in draft space. So G4 only applies to drafts if they were already deleted from draft space by MFD, not if they were deleted from article space by AFD. That is a precise distinction, and your nomination was sort of an exception to an exception. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Atelopus harlequin

Hi there! I noticed you recently nominated Draft:Atelopus harlequin for G12 speedy deletion. However, you didn't include a link stating the original source, and Earwig isn't showing any copyright violations. I have declined the speedy deletion nomination for now, but if you have more information, feel free to reply here and/or renominate the draft. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:53, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Update: I now see where you placed the source. Unfortunately, I do not have access to it, so I will leave the CSD review for another administrator. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade: Thanks for your note! It is a bit of a puzzler where to put the source in a CSD G12 nomination, when it is an offline source. I see another admin did delete the draft, so it is all sorted. Best, --bonadea contributions talk 08:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Regarding recent rejection

I have fixed my article to be neutral view but arvat do not have any independent coverage. Tanmoy108 (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Courtesy link: Draft:Arvat. @Tanmoy108: In that case, I'm afraid there can't be a Wikipedia article about them, because independent coverage is a fundamental requirement. (Please don't forget to respond to the conflict of interest question on your user talk page!) --bonadea contributions talk 14:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

can you tell what are the type of independent coverage required other than any press Tanmoy108 (talk) 14:36, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

What is your connection to Arvat? --bonadea contributions talk 14:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

I am the CEO of Arvat Tanmoy108 (talk) 14:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

I see. Well, the kind of sources that are required is described in the decline notice on your user talk page: in the grey box, the text that begins "This draft's references do not show..." contains crucial information as well as links to policy and guideline pages that explain exactly what kind of sources are necessary. Note that you can't create such sources – they have to exist without the prompting of yourself or anyone else connected to the company (in other words, they must be fully independent). Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 15:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

ook thank you Tanmoy108 (talk) 15:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Airpaz

Hi bonadea, could you help me to review that draft article ? If, there is still something mistake, could you give the guide ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jodysetiawan23 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

@Jodysetiawan23: You submitted it three minutes before posting here, and it is listed among the drafts waiting for review. Please do not badger the volunteer editors to get preferential treatment for the draft – that's never appropriate, particularly not for someone who is paid to edit Wikipedia. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 09:12, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

I understand that the draft is currently in the review queue, and I appreciate the time and effort of the volunteer editors. I did not intend to rush the process or seek preferential treatment, and I apologize if my message came across that way.

I’ll wait for the standard review process to take its course. Thank you for your time and for all the work you do in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 10:36, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Asking about a article

Is the article Draft:Rama Rajya or Draft:Triggered Insaan ready to be a article? Regards,Ved Sharma (talk) (contribs) 08:42, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

@Kharavela Deva: No. --bonadea contributions talk 09:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

More details about decline of draft

I noticed that you declined the submission of the Draft:SmartyLLC article with the reason that it "appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia". Would you be willing to point out the specific portions of the article that you are referring to? Jknacnud (talk) 02:47, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

@Jknacnud: I'm afraid it applies to the entire draft. I have consolidated a number of references – a press release which was republished in several publications – and removed some promotional quotes from the press release, but that does not mean that what remains is any less promotional. --bonadea contributions talk 12:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

@Bonadea: Thank you for the feedback! I will keep working on it. Jknacnud (talk) 15:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Shouryuv

Hey @Bonadea, I've seen you have recently moved Draft:Shouryuv to draftspace citing more sources required, and a possible COI. I had actually reviewed it earlier, then the creator seems to have mistakenly moved it to draft and back to main, causing it to lose the reviewed status. I was wondering why you thought it was not ready for mainspace. It seems to have enough sources, and per WP:DIRECTOR, the movie that this director is known for has significant coverage, which is also cited in the article. I'm not sure about COI, but the article seems to have been written in a neutral tone. Thought to ask your opinion before any doing anything myself. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:58, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

William Wimmera

Hello Bonadea. You have just declined my draft about William Wimmera. I am a new editor and had thought I was saving to my sandbox while I worked on the draft. I have been researching the topic for a number of years and am transferring citations from another document. Please could you advise if I am working on the document in the wrong place or can save changes without pressing 'publish'? Thanks for your help. Queenday23 (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

@Queenday23: thank you for your message. It looks like another editor submitted the draft (I have no idea why!) and I sympathise with that being frustrating. Don't worry about it; you do have to click "Publish" in order to save anything on Wikipedia, but that does not mean that you are asking for the draft to be reviewed. That only happens if you click the blue "Submit" button on the draft. That your draft was submitted prematurely won't count against it in a future review. Regards --bonadea contributions talk 15:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your help with this. Will continue working on the draft and hope to get there in the end. Queenday23 (talk) 10:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Tatiana Reed

A copied message with regards to your recent decline of my proposed article:

Hi @Bonadea. Don't quite understand your rationale? The Wikipedia notoriety criteria states that three accurate and reliable sources are required which show significant coverage. I have provided three: 1) Country Life, a full-article feature on Reed. 2) Classic Driver, a high-brow journalistic source with another full-article feature. 3) the Mail Online article, which although tabloid, provides the same information as the former two. While some may argue, it is the content that's notable (i.e., arguably Reed's Land Rover, not Reed herself), it is Reed, her personality and adventures that are being reported on, fuelled by her interest in her Land Rover.

Furthermore, while the podcast and YouTube sources are primary and not peer-reviewed, the frequency of them (plus Reed's undeniable presence throughout them), provides a guide as to her social media influence, and the scope of her out-reach.

Please could you confirm your issues with my sourcing?

TIA... Mac Edmunds (talk) 21:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Please solve problem

“I have added multiple reliable sources, including WHED (World Higher Education Database), AD Scientific Index, and other reputable academic references. These sources confirm the university’s notability and credibility. Given these improvements, could you please review the article and consider removing the maintenance templates? Let me know if any further enhancements are needed. Thank you.” Kocaeli Health and Technology University Newinwiki8 (talk) 15:35, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

This is wrong

Hello, I want to clarify that I am a student at Kocaeli Health and Technology University and have no financial affiliation with the institution. I am not being compensated in any way for editing this article. My sole intention was to improve the article by adding reliable sources and ensuring that the university is fairly represented, just like many other universities that have pages on Wikipedia, even those without significant recognition.

I have addressed the concerns raised by adding multiple reputable sources, including WHED, AD Scientific Index, and Times Higher Education. These sources confirm the university’s notability. Given these improvements, I kindly request a review of the article and reconsideration of the maintenance templates.

Thank you for your time and consideration.”

Kocaeli Health and Technology University Newinwiki8 (talk) 15:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Responded on your user talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 15:50, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Regarding "My Husband's Wife"

Thank you for your comments. I will keep your advice going forward regarding quotations and sources.

However, I do not understand the reversion to edits of My Husband's Wife, I understand you said to respect other variations of english, but it's an Egyptian movie and as far as I'm aware Egypt does not have an English variant. The plot summary is hard to read as is and seems poorly worded.

I also took the IMDb description of the plot of the movie and added it because it reads much smoother. Factinator5000 (talk) 14:08, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

The revert had nothing to do with English varieties – that was an issue with some of your other edits, but not this one. There are multiple reasons why we can't copy plot descriptions from IMDB: most importantly because it is a copyright violation, but also because such plot descriptions are written in a promotional tone, and almost never cover the entire plot. I agree that the existing plot summary isn't very well-written, but the main problem with it is actually that the reader doesn't find out what happens in the film, only its premise. --bonadea contributions talk 14:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 67

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 67, January – February 2025

• East View Press and The Africa Report join the library
• Spotlight: Wikimedia+Libraries International Convention and WikiCredCon
• Tech tip: Suggest page

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --18:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Sudhir Mehta (entrepreneur) Draftification

Bonadea, thanks for your input on Sudhir Mehta (entrepreneur). It meets WP:GNG and WP:BIO with 11 independent refs—e.g., *Economic Times Auto 2025*, *Fortune India 2025*, *The Times of India 2022*—plus awards (Lokmat 2024). COI’s baseless—I’m unpaid, per User:MH-wiki2025 and Talk:Sudhir Mehta (entrepreneur). I’ve never agreed to AfC-only—WP:AfC’s optional per policy. Can you detail sourcing/notability gaps or AfC pact evidence? I favor mainspace per WP:ATD. MH-wiki2025 (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

OP has been blocked. --bonadea contributions talk 13:54, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Draft: Wadiz

Hello Bonadea. You have just declined my draft about Wadiz. May I know which part of the article I need to improve on? It was previously declined for the same reason but I have made many edits and removed sentences that sounded like an advertisement. Also, i tried to write sentences as neutral as i can but it got rejected again. Could you help me to make this draft an article? 진국 (talk) 00:21, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Clarity on Draft:Derivan

Hi Bonadea, I am slightly confused exactly on where exactly the problem lies, as the pages I had based this one off (Liquitex, Golden Artist Colours, Winsor & Newton, and some other Acrylic paint manufacturers) all have equal or fewer sources (on some of the pages are primarily their own websites too just in different formats like webarchive), less information on their pages, and are written from the same perspective? And I added the brand name to the artist materials brands in the acrylic section as I presumed it was supposed to be a list of any notable brands. How do you suggest I work on this so it has a chance of being approved? I am still fairly new to the whole wikipedia thing and am just struggling to understand a bit. THanks :) Dave83821 (talk) 00:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Notable topic

Hi, is there something specific that needs to be addressed for Draft:Venhue to be included along with its peers? I.e. Foxface Natural. Trying to document East Village restaurants. Venhue has been noted on The Today Show, Yelp and other major publications many sources have been provided. Nycrest (talk) 18:25, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

See my response to the inquiry you made on my talk. S0091 (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Request on 16:34:50, 3 April 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by Kronveldt

• Kronveldt (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:State of Maine V (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The Maine Maritime Academy has used the Training Ship State of Maine for a number of years. It is mentioned often on their site and in the press including articles about its final training trip -summer 2024- and this replacement ship. The proposed page describes the replacement ship (see reference 1). Note that both the existing TS State of Maine page and the page for National Security Multi-Mission Vessels mention this replacement ship (5 maritime academies are getting replacements). There are some other press accounts, mostly older, but I don't understand what they would add that isn't included in the MMA official press release and the two press accounts I have referenced. Please give me an example of something that I could add that would make this page ok.

Kronveldt (talk) 16:34, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Oh, and the Maine Maine Maritime Academy wikipage has a placeholder for this ship in their list of training ships:

Training ships

The academy has utilized a number of vessels over the years to provide hands-on training and instruction opportunities for cadets at sea, usually former U.S. Navy ships. Each of the academy's training ships bear the same name, TS State of Maine, during their respective time in service as the academy training ship.

USS Comfort (AH-6) - 1953-1963

USS Ancon (AGC-4) - 1963-1973

USNS Upshur (T-AP-198) - 1973-1995

TS State of Maine (formerly USNS Tanner (T-AGS-40)) - 6 June 1997-2024

TS State of Maine V (currently undergoing commissioning) Kronveldt (talk) 22:23, 3 April 2025 (UTC)