User talk:Baybrens

December 2024

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:13, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merhaba, Henüz araştırmalarımı tamamlıyorum. Referansları yerleştirdim.Araştırmalarımla beraber sayfalarını ekleyeceğim. Ekleme yapmadan maddeler kendiliğinden var olmayacaktır. Bu yüzden öncelikle açmış olduğum maddeyi tamamen şeffaf araştırmalarım dahilinde oluşturdum. Lütfen bana destek verin maddeleri birlikte oluşturalım. Kayda değer bir klavuz olduğunu araştırmaları yapınca siz de göreceksiniz. Araştırma yaparken farkettim ki Türkiye'de birçok buluşa imza atan bir kuruluş. Araştırma kaynakları yetersiz olduğundan dolayı internette bilgi edinmek çok kısıtlı. Yakın zamanda kurumun yöneticileriyle mevcut buluşları ile alakalı bir röportaj yaparak birkaç haber sitesinde paylaşmayı düşünüyorum. Bu konuda beni destekleyeceğiniz için şimdiden teşekkür ederim. Baybrens (talk) 14:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of elevator manufacturers. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. We've been through this before. If the company is notable then WP:WTAF before adding it to this list. And this is not a minor edit. See WP:MINOR. Your edit is identical to the edit made by user:Necati Yüce, right down to the impossible claim that the company is both a current and a former elevator manufacturer. This suggests that you are Necati Yüce and are evading your block. Meters (talk) 08:50, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merhaba

Wiki yönergelerini baştan sona yeniden takip edeceğim. Asansör sektörüne ilgiliyim. Ve bununla alakalı Türkiye'nin çalışmaları hakkında araştırmalar yapıyorum. Ancak Wikipedia'da Türkiye'deki firmalar hakkında tarhiçe bilgisi mevcut değildir. Bu yüzden bilgilerimi tüm insanlarla paylaşmak istiyorum. Yönlendirme yaptığınız için teşekkür ederim. Baybrens (talk) 11:06, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, write the article first. Do not restore the entry in List of elevator manufacturers unless you first create an article to show the company's notability. And please answer the question. Are you user:Necati Yüce? Meters (talk) 20:31, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yukselis Elevator (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

But this is surprisingly close, for a stub with only three references. I hope you can find some more sources!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yukselis Elevator and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 02:33, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Baybrens! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 02:33, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yukselis Elevator (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Resubmitted without any improvement, previous decline still stands.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yukselis Elevator and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:49, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello Baybrens. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Baybrens. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Baybrens|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:50, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]