User talk:97.129.82.207

Well, I can’t do it…

The standard offer just can’t do anything to affect me anymore! 😞 97.129.82.207 (talk) 19:14, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MrOllie: I am still worried about you and your snitching. 97.129.82.207 (talk) 19:15, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Elli: I can’t take any more of the stupid standard offer. 97.129.82.207 (talk) 19:17, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 19:23, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Look, my severe apologies, as most admins are adults, but the problem is, I hate being banned from Wikipedia, I just want another chance, and the standard offer is too much! 97.129.82.207 (talk) 19:26, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who you are, and most admins are adults, and I don't know what you're talking about with being "banned". Drmies (talk) 19:29, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, my block @PhilKnight put me into is expiring just before my birthday. 97.129.82.207 (talk) 19:48, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's very, very unwise to make it possible to figure out your birthday on this very public forum. 331dot (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean banned like you know the long-term abuse block and global lock from all the accounts, including @Masierra1 that @Bsadowski1 blocked I had to cause overall throughout to 2023 to 2025! I don’t know if I am keeping up my damage or not keeping my word, but I feel bad that this is the point I’ve been using the UTRS since couple of days ago, and @Yamla most certainly, rudely declined it, saying I was not innocent and I was so abusive. I was worried if I kept disruptive editing in production companies, then @MrOllie started to report me again. -- 97.129.82.207 (talk) 19:33, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.129.82.207 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Frankly, I can’t stop thinking about the ways I’ve acted on this site, and yes I know right away block evasion is not the way to appeal. I’ve been worrying about the fact that I’ve been using this site as long-term abuse or the abuse of multiple accounts. Kind to think of that @MrOllie was right that I kept disruptive behavior when I was only just trying to add some categories that correct on what the article is like production companies or film studios and even sometimes video game studios and by the time @Yamla blocked declines is a case of matter of stress and impatience. I tried to revert, but obviously it didn’t quite run through. 97.129.82.207 (talk) 19:40, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No thanks. 331dot (talk) 20:09, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I know standard offers require 6 months according to users like @Asilvering, but I can tell her that I tried to avoid block/ban evasion and abuse, but I would seek attention to the Arbitration Committee if I’m full awaited to. 97.129.82.207 (talk) 19:42, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I could reach to @Asilvering on Discord (WP:DISCORD), but I don’t know if she might allow me to let her give me advice I’m still learning that Wikipedia is not always a free encyclopedia where anyone can edit. -- 97.129.82.207 (talk) 19:44, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I even promise I took advice from JBW to wait another year. -- 97.129.82.207 (talk) 19:45, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you've lost TPA again, so you can't respond (at least, not without block evading, and please don't shoot yourself in the foot like that), but just in case you're still reading this: "I tried to avoid block/ban evasion and abuse" is never going to fly. This isn't one of those things where effort counts for something. If you can't do something very simple like "don't edit Wikipedia for six months", it's going to be very difficult for any admin to believe you when you say you won't do something that isn't quite so simple, like "not doing the thing you got blocked for in the first place". If you can't control yourself, we can't let you on the website.

It's still the free encyclopedia anyone can edit, by the way. Copy it, remix it, even sell it - you're free to do so. What you can't do - or shouldn't do, anyway - is participate on this website. A year's a lot shorter than you think. Please wait it out. -- asilvering (talk) 05:25, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. UtherSRG (talk) 00:49, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.