User:Ace111

MediaWiki version 1.44.0-wmf.22 (cb2fb4e).

Wikipedia:Babel

ru

Русский — родной язык этого участника.

en-4

This user can contribute with a near-native level of English.

de-2

Dieser Benutzer hat fortgeschrittene Deutschkenntnisse.

fr-1

Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau élémentaire de français.

Search user languages

This user is a bot owner. His bot is Acebot (talk · contribs).

This user runs a bot, Acebot (contribs). It performs tasks that are extremely tedious to do manually.

This user has created a global account. Ace111's main account is on Wikipedia (in Russian).

Википедия
Я вношу вклад в русскую Википедию.

I support the Russian-language Wikipedia with my contributions.

This user is from the planet Earth.

This user enjoys the
Picture of the Day.¤

This user contributes using Firefox.

Picture of the day

Silene flos-cuculi

Photograph credit: Ivar Leidus

Edits Count / Contribution Tree , Plot ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Top 10 Greatest Wikipedias

English	Sinugboanon	Deutsch	Français	Svenska	Nederlands	Русский	Español	Italiano	Polski
6,973,988	6,116,767+	3,001,219+	2,674,157+	2,607,873+	2,183,018+	2,036,433+	2,021,102+	1,910,538+	1,652,711+

More than 64,690,078 articles in all Wikipedias

Slavic Wikipedias have 8,357,090 articles.

Russia

Geography of Karafuto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is a content fork of Sakhalin#Geography and Sakhalin#Climate; additionally, it is simply a list. b3stJ (IPA: /bʌˈθrɛstˌdʒeɪ/, formerly AEagleLionThing) | User talk page | 23:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, Japan, and Russia. Shellwood (talk) 23:36, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Merge - since the article lacks reference and it discusses on the Geography of Karafuto Prefecture in which there is already an existing article on Karafuto Prefecture - I think it is best if we merge it into the main article Karafuto Prefecture as a subset describing it's Geography. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 08:16, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete – I would have voted to merge, but nothing in Geography of Karafuto, which is essentially a list article, is sourced. Yue🌙 05:25, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Marat Ressin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BLP, no media sources relevant to the article. Article moved from draft to main space without being checked. Bexaendos (talk) 12:25, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bexaendos (talk) 12:25, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 12:54, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Keep – the article is supported by multiple reliable sources including mainstream media (e.g. Canadian Jewish News, Forbes Kazakhstan, CMDA, Schulich/York University). Subject is notable as the founder of YEDI, a globally ranked accelerator by UBI Global. Sources confirm awards, academic work, and public recognition.

Oleksandr Makarov (talk) 13:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete: No clear indication of notability. Does not meet WP:GNG criteria.Rimesodom (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:11, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:40, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Ilya Pozin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notable, verifiable sources proving his subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for persons Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 09:04, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 09:04, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Internet, and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:39, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:GNG, no significant independent coverage of him. Better to redirect to Pluto TV and add a section there. Rimesodom (talk) 14:01, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete - the only extensive information about this person is sourced from one article in - bizarrely - the Hollywood Reporter. That's not significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 02:08, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Alexey Zarov

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No doubt a good doctor and hospital administrator, but doesn't reach notability criteria. One reference, and that is from a connected source (his workplace); the arguments in the last AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexey Zarov) still hold. Doesn't meet WP:NACADEMIC nor general notability criteria. Klbrain (talk) 00:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Medicine, and Russia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete and Salt. Not remotely notable. Time to stop trying. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:55, 24 March 2025 (UTC).

Delete. Does not meet notability criteria. Even a quick search in Russian does not turn up anything academically remarkable - just a lot of repetition using the same phrases all based on either the hospital website or the church press releases (it seems the church runs the hospital). Espatie (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete. Nothing came up in Google. Does not meet notability criteria. RolandSimon (talk) 10:53, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Ohr Avner Chabad Day School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable religious school. Does not meet WP:GNG. Variety312 (talk) 22:29, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Israel, and Russia. Variety312 (talk) 22:29, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Judaism. Shellwood (talk) 22:30, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Keep because this article refers to a WP:N entire network of schools all over the former Soviet Union (e.g. Russia, Ukraine, Georgia etc) that are easily supported by WP:RS [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] that are sponsored by the Ohr Avner Foundation founded and run by billionaire Lev Leviev. IZAK (talk) 22:53, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep. This is a notable network of day schools. The campuses should be collapsed into it. Without such merges, context is missing. gidonb (talk) 02:15, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep per Lev Leviev notable network of day schools.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep - Great work by IZAK for those RS he found, although someone should definitely put those in the article lol. EytanMelech (talk) 00:41, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Taxi Maxim

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of importance No source was found either within the article or outside the article that meet notability. According to Wikipedia's notability guidelines (WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV), a subject must receive significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to merit an article. All sources used herein are not secondary and do not comply with Wikipedia rules WP:ORGTRIV WP:SECONDARY. Wikipedia is not a promotional medium. Self-promotion, product placement, press releases, branding campaigns, advertisements, and paid material are not valid routes to an encyclopedia article. Information that a company has started operating in a particular country is still not proof of notability, since it is not a measure of the attention the company has received as well (WP:SPIP). By not deleting this article, Wikipedia risks breaching its own policies designed to maintain the quality and reliability of its content. Therefore, I recommend that the article be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Segovia Ar (talk • contribs) 06:43, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 March 16. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:51, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Transportation, and Russia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:14, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep A ride hailing service that operates in 1000 cities in 18 countries has a strong claim of notability. The nominator is a Single-purpose account entirely focused on Taxi Maxim. They began by adding content to the article and now they have decided to try to delete the article. Certainly, the article can be improved but deletion is not the correct outcome. I am confident that a Russian speaking editor familiar with Russia's business media could improve the article. Cullen328 (talk) 17:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Daniel Segovia Ar - can you explain what is going on here? It's quite confusing. You created and are the primary editor of this article. It is also the only (minus 1) article you have edited. Your note on the article talk page says that it needs to be removed because "it is wrong". Lamona (talk) 04:07, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Others

Draft

Shortcuts

Science

Camera, hand lens, and microscope probe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. For reference, CHAMP was a proposed instrument that doesn't seem to have been included in the Mars Science Laboratory. Originally proposed at https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20090007927 - all sources I can find are either primary (authored by one or more of the inventors) or mention the instrument only in passing. Deprodded on account of Google Scholar hits, but I don't think any of those articles are secondary. Anerdw (talk) 07:19, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Technology, and Spaceflight. Anerdw (talk) 07:19, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
It's all conference papers, as far as I can find. Uncle G (talk) 20:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

NEMO (Stellar Dynamics Toolbox)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable stellar dynamics toolkit. No coverage beyond a couple papers and a brief mention in a 1997 book. Note: the article was also started by one of the toolkit's co-creators. Sgubaldo (talk) 17:35, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Astronomy, and Computing. Sgubaldo (talk) 17:35, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Merge with Piet Hut: This software is used or mentioned in hundreds of independent publications, although none of them appear to discuss the software in detail. It should be discussed in some article even though it doesn't satisfy notability guidelines. I would seriously consider revising the guidelines to allow articles like this to be kept, similar to how WP:NMEDIA and WP:NPERIODICAL have a criterion for publications that are widely cited by other reliable sources, but that is a discussion for a different time. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 03:16, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Evrim Ağacı

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable. The most I could find is receiving a grant from the European Society for Evolutionary Biology and some blog posts. ^Falling_Gravity 03:26, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Turkey. ^Falling_Gravity 03:26, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, and Companies. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:24, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:24, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Polyrotaxane-based paint

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources about this topic aren't about polyrotaxane-based paints as a category of substances, but of one particular product made by Nissan circa 2012 (and every single reference I could find is from 2012 or 2013, and rather trivial). Polyrotaxanes are a notable class of compound, but I'm not convinced by the sourcing that this one product is notable, and certainly not "polyrotaxane-based paints" as a whole. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Merge orr redirect: to an article about polyrotaxanes. I can't find anything about this type of paint, but there is sourcing about the "poly" thing as a chemical compound. Oaktree b (talk) 20:37, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please point to a target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GrabUp - Talk 20:31, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

- DELETE Removed my earlier vote of MERGE. Reasoning: I was trying to source the statement that Nissan uses this in their scratch shield coating, but could not find anything certain. A review paper published in 2024 commented that "the exact scientific technology has not been clearly revealed" for these coatings(https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202302463). Given there is no certain information about polyrotaxane paints, this article should be deleted.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 21:58, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Bruce A. Manning

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:NPROF notability on its face; not a named professor or other criterion. Has been tagged as deficient for over ten years, and not substantially improved in the past decade. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:27, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and California. Shellwood (talk) 17:07, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Environment, and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:35, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak keep per WP:PROF#C1 and high-cited publications on Google Scholar [8]. But it's weak because I couldn't find much else. He appears to be the chair of his department but that doesn't count as a notability criterion. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep. Clear pass of WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:17, 9 March 2025 (UTC).

Comment: I'm not !voting due to a potential conflict of interest, but I notified Sandstein, who re-created the article, for comment. I'll get back with you all. Bearian (talk) 10:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete. I've been notified of this discussion, and indeed, according to the page history, I created this article in 2007 with the edit summary "recreated deleted article on user request". I have no recollection whatsoever as to who made this request to me or why I acted on it. But I agree that the article fails our current inclusion standards because it lacks any third-party references and does not describe why its subject might be notable. Sandstein 14:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Comment: I think those are good arguments to improve the page substantially, but doesn't necessarily tell us whether to keep or delete. Qflib (talk) 14:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Per WP:A7, an "article about a real person ... that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant" is subject to speedy deletion. Sandstein 17:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

It doesn't take much (far less than for a keep at an AfD) to save an article from A7 deletion, and I think the article's "He is an expert in environmental chemistry" is enough.

As for actual notability, please note that WP:PROF is not about third-party references and it explicitly states that third-party references are not required as evidence for WP:PROF notability. (Or, put another way, we have thousands of third-party references, all of those papers that cite Manning's papers, and the problem is not one of having too few sources but rather too many to sift through.) —David Eppstein (talk) 22:24, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Keep. I agree that WP:Prof#C1 is satisfied. The work on arsenates is getting 3-figure and 4-figure citation numbers, which is strong for this fairly low-citation field (environmental geochemistry). The page does need some work to flesh it out some more. Qflib (talk) 15:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep. This person was recently promoted to Department Chair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbspbs (talk • contribs) 23:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
As I said earlier, that is not relevant for notability. The only academic notability criterion for administrative work, WP:PROF#C6, is only for heads of entire universities. And #C5 is for chairs given to individual professors in recognition of outstanding scholarship, not for chairs of departments. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:08, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep per Prof#C1. As for the potential conflict of interest, it's tenuous: the SFSU President and I went to high school. Substantially, his top articles were cited 1,049, 895, 820, 786, and 569 times. He seems to be a very private person, who never grants interviews. I added a couple of sources. The "expert in" sentence in the lead paragraph is sufficient allegation of notability. Bearian (talk) 22:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete. I disagree about WP:NPROF#C1. While one paper with > 1K citations is relevant, if you look at his co-author and also here the contrast is stark; Fendorf has an h-factor of 99 and a string of Fellow elections. From this comparison I don't think that this is really a low citation field. If he had some of those Fellow elections then, of course it would be different. However, without them I view it as close but not sustained enough.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldm1954 (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 23:03, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete: I'm not convinced by the argument for an NACADEMIC criterion 1 pass; according to Scopus, his h-index is 17, which is well below the average range (35-55) for a full professor in the physical sciences; we would need to see substantial evidence beyond citation count for his influence in the field. I don't see any other plausible argument for notability. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Participants somewhat divided on whether or not the subject satisfies WP:NPROF notability criteria on the basis of level of citations; further comment on this aspect would be useful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 04:03, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Keep clearly passes WP:PROF#C1.--DesiMoore (talk) 15:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Science Proposed deletions

Flow arrangement (via WP:PROD on 17 January 2025)
Reiner Kümmel (via WP:PROD on 16 January 2025)
Measure (physics) (via WP:PROD on 7 December 2024)
Evolution equations in high-energy particle physics (via WP:PROD on 4 December 2024)

Science Miscellany for deletion

Science Redirects for discussion

Deletion Review

This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ace111.