This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
change the short description generator to include "is infobox in lead" to prevent generated short descriptions whete the infobox is not in the lead of the article -1ctinus📝🗨12:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Please check affected articles to ensure that this change worked. The code does not check for redirects to this template; I recommend using manual short descriptions for those extreme edge cases. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
There is no parameter currently to write who built the building. This may not be needed for grand and modern buildings but for simple historic buildings it was often built by a single person. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe had it also be optional to display as builder/constructor? I will use that for now but someone may not be contracted to build something. Traumnovelle (talk) 19:31, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Separated parameters for "antenna" and "spire" or add new parameter "pinnacle spire"
Can the height parameters between the "Antenna" and the "Spire" be separated ? according to CTBUH, where the antenna is the tip of the building while the spire is the height of the building architecture? or add new parameter "Pinnacle spire"? 2400:9800:201:A464:7516:BD12:E79B:2198 (talk) 03:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I first added |mapframe=no and clicked Preview. The mapframe map went away, showing no map at all. You are welcome to continue editing that page to make it look the way you want it to look; I just thought it would help to have some sort of map. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what you were trying to do there, but I have restored the last working version. If you really don't want readers to see a helpful map so that they know where the building is, add | mapframe=no on a new line in the infobox. I suggest putting it directly under the |coordinates= line. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm baffled. At Xscape (building), the map shows a location that is about 100 miles north of reality. If I put the same infobox here (and in my sandbox), it is correct!!! If I edit the section (isolating it from its context in the article, I assume?), it is also wrong . If I remove the the coordinates from the other building in the article so that there is no risk of confusion, still wrong. If I deliberately change the coordinates to (say) 50.04137|N|, I get a location that is only(!) 25 miles west. What am I missing? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:36, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(I should mention that I've just now set mapframe=off because it is better to have no map than one that is wildly off. If anyone wants to verify, just turn it back on: if you see Nottingham, you've got the (un)desired result.) --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:53, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Did you see the map pre-fix, (link here Map) two shapes for both Xscapes were displayed so the 'centre' of the view was a point exactly in-between. On OSM both have the same Wikidata number but no type parameter so why they have been uploaded, dunno. As the infobox is for MK, I removed the call for the shapes so it reverts to the MK coordinates instead. The article covers the brand so it ideally could cover both, to tidy it all up the mapframe could go back to displaying the two and the OSM entries get the correct flag. Regs, The Equalizer (talk) 18:43, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I had guessed that might be it, but when I removed the coordinates for the Yorkshire Xscape, it made no difference.
_-_The_Noun_Project.svg){kind=small}
Done Please check affected articles to ensure that this change worked. The code does not check for redirects to this template; I recommend using manual short descriptions for those extreme edge cases. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Already done See 
. If I remove the the coordinates from the other building in the article so that there is no risk of confusion, still wrong. If I deliberately change the coordinates to (say) 50.04137|N|, I get a location that is only(!) 25 miles west. What am I missing? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:36, 27 February 2025 (UTC)