Talk:Loyang Tua Pek Kong Temple
Appearance
![]() | A fact from Loyang Tua Pek Kong Temple appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 February 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 04:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Loyang Tua Pek Kong Temple in Singapore houses effigies of both the Jade Emperor and Mahaganapati?
- Source: The Straits Times (URLs in article)
Created by Kingoflettuce (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 177 past nominations.
KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 06:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC).
Doing... ミラP@Miraclepine 17:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Can't find verification of a Tua Pek Kong and Tai Sui in the attached ref (though I found the former in the Li/Lu ref); while the page says there is one Kṣitigarbha statue, the Sin ref says "Buddhist deities" without specifying if there is more than one. You may wanna look back at the Li/Lu ref for improvement, This ref may be useful, since it mentions the prayer hall unlike the Chan and Sin ref (not to mention it will help with making this already-short page even longer).
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Created three days before nom and is 1777 B. Besides the issues I pointed out, sourcing is otherwise either AGFed or verifiable and is overall reliable. @Kingoflettuce: fix the issues and you're good to go. ミラP@Miraclepine 17:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks fr the feedback. Have added the Roots ref! cheers, KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 13:44, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Kingoflettuce: It checks out, so
ALT0 approved. ミラP@Miraclepine 15:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- I strongly recommend saying "effigies" rather than "the effigies". DS (talk) 04:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- @DragonflySixtyseven: quite right, thanks. KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 04:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- I strongly recommend saying "effigies" rather than "the effigies". DS (talk) 04:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Kingoflettuce: It checks out, so